A Comparative Evaluation of Three Stem Profile Equations for Three Precious Tree Species in Southern China

Accurately describing the stem curve of precious tree species and estimating the quantity of various types of wood and their volume in the tropics can provide technical support for reasonable bucking. This study utilized Erythrophleum fordii, Castanopsis hystrix and Tectona grandis as study objects. Forty replicates of each species were used for a total of 120 individual trees. Their tape equations were constructed using simple tape equations, segmented taper equations and variable form taper equations. Statistical indicators were utilized to determine the best taper equation for the three types of precious tree species. A number of methods were compared and analyzed, including the index of correlation, the residual sum of squares, the mean prediction error, the variance of prediction errors and the root mean square error. Finally, a preliminary quantitative analysis was conducted to determine the trends of these three types of tree species. The result shows that the precision of the three predictions developed for each species is high, and, in particular, the segmented taper equations with optimized algorithms is the best. The tendency of the three species to vary was shown to be the highest for T. grandis in the range of 0.0 to 0.8 for its relative height, followed by E. fordii, while the variation of C. hystrix was the smallest. However, in the range of 0.8 to 1.0 relative height, the variation of Castanopsis hystrix was the largest, and the variation of both E. fordii and T. grandis were almost the same. Therefore, the segmented taper equations with optimization algorithms was recommended to fit the three types of tree species in the tropics. These types of equations can be used to estimate the stumpage and timber quantity and as a guide reasonable bucking for these three species.

[1]  L. Saint-Andre,et al.  Comparing local calibration using random effects estimation and Bayesian calibrations: a case study with a mixed effect stem profile model , 2019, Annals of Forest Science.

[2]  J. Stape,et al.  Generalized stem taper and tree volume equations applied to eucalyptus of varying genetics in Brazil , 2019, Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

[3]  Hongyan Jia,et al.  Facilitation by Tree Species in Variable Retention Harvesting for the Restoration of Monoculture Plantations in Southern China , 2019, Tropical Conservation Science.

[4]  H. Temesgen,et al.  Estimating upper stem diameters and volume of Douglas-fir and Western hemlock trees in the Pacific northwest , 2018, Forest Ecosystems.

[5]  F. Dinulică,et al.  A rapid method for estimating the median diameter of the stem profile of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst) trees , 2017 .

[6]  C. López-Sánchez,et al.  Modelling and localizing a stem taper function for Pinus radiata in Spain , 2015 .

[7]  Lichao Jiang,et al.  Segmented taper equations with crown ratio and stand density for Dahurian Larch (Larix gmelinii) in Northeastern China , 2011, Journal of Forestry Research.

[8]  Chun-xiang Hu,et al.  [Stem profile model and variable-exponent of Larix gmelinii plantation]. , 2011, Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology.

[9]  Aaron R. Weiskittel,et al.  Comparison of model forms for estimating stem taper and volume in the primary conifer species of the North American Acadian Region , 2010, Annals of Forest Science.

[10]  Lichun Jiang,et al.  Modeling stem profile of Lebanon cedar, Brutian pine, and Cilicica fir in Southern Turkey using nonlinear mixed-effects models , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[11]  Lichun Jiang,et al.  Compatible stem volume and taper equations for Brutian pine, Cedar of Lebanon, and Cilicica fir in Turkey , 2008 .

[12]  K. Gadow,et al.  Parameter-Parsimonious Taper Functions for Describing Stem Profiles , 2008 .

[13]  G. Geoff Wang,et al.  Taper Equations for Five Major Commercial Tree Species in Manitoba, Canada , 2007 .

[14]  Cheng Dong-lai A study on the changing values of form index andgeometrical solids of tree stem , 2007 .

[15]  Douglas A. Maguire,et al.  Modeling stem taper of three central Oregon species using nonlinear mixed effects models and autoregressive error structures , 2003 .

[16]  Woo-Kyun Lee,et al.  Modeling stem profiles for Pinus densiflora in Korea , 2003 .

[17]  R. G. Oderwald,et al.  Dimensionally compatible volume and taper equations , 2001 .

[18]  T. Gregoire,et al.  A switching model of bole taper , 2001 .

[19]  Yun Zhang,et al.  Wood products cooperatives : Overview and exploratory analysis , 2001 .

[20]  S. Bowers Increased Value through Optimal Bucking , 1998 .

[21]  H. Burkhart,et al.  Volume and Taper Equations for Thinned and Unthinned Loblolly Pine Trees in Cutover, Site-Prepared Plantations , 1997 .

[22]  C. Muhairwe Tree form and taper variation over time for interior lodgepole pine , 1994 .

[23]  A. Kozak,et al.  A variable-exponent taper equation , 1988 .

[24]  E. L. Amidon A general taper functional form to predict bole volume for five mixed-conifer species in California , 1984 .

[25]  Harold E. Burkhart,et al.  Evaluation of Two Methods for Cubic-Volume Prediction of Loblolly Pine to Any Merchantable Limit , 1980 .

[26]  Qv Cao Evaluation of two methods for cubic volume prediction of loblolly pine to any merchantability limit , 1980 .

[27]  Harold E. Burkhart,et al.  Segmented Polynomial Regression Applied to Taper Equations , 1976 .

[28]  J. H. Smith,et al.  Taper Functions and their Application in Forest Inventory , 1969 .