Smart Collaboration in Global Virtual Teams: The Influence of Culture on Technology Acceptance and Communication Effectiveness

Teams are beginning to rely on smart communication technology that is enhanced by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Yet, we lack understanding of how these smart communication technologies (SCT) influence team collaboration, especially in global virtual teams (GVT). This study empirically investigates how cultural values and practices influence the acceptance of SCT and how the use of this technology impacts communication effectiveness in GVT. We surveyed 643 members of 109 GVT before and after using the SCT. Results showed that team members from individualistic, future oriented cultures generally had more positive expectations towards the performance and enjoyment of using the technology. Uncertainty avoidance increased effort expectancy. After using SCT for communicating in the GVT, most differences disappeared. Regarding communication effectiveness, SCT had a positive influence, which was stronger for performance and future oriented cultures.

[1]  Douglas C. Derrick,et al.  Examining Trust and Reliance in Collaborations between Humans and Automated Agents , 2018, HICSS.

[2]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[3]  Lionel P. Robert,et al.  Are you satisfied yet? Shared leadership, individual trust, autonomy, and satisfaction in virtual teams , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Machines as Teammates: A Collaboration Research Agenda , 2018, HICSS.

[5]  Chang Liu,et al.  Comparison of mobile shopping continuance intention between China and USA from an espoused cultural perspective , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Virtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters , 2019, Academy of Management Annals.

[7]  Paul R. Daugherty,et al.  Collaborative Intelligence: Humans and AI Are Joining Forces , 2018 .

[8]  Gloria E. Phillips-Wren,et al.  Assessing Decision Making Quality in Face-to-Face Teams versus Virtual Teams in a Virtual World , 2011, J. Decis. Syst..

[9]  Moez Limayem,et al.  Team Collaboration in Virtual Worlds: Editorial to the Special Issue , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[11]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[12]  Erich C. Dierdorff,et al.  Facet personality and surface-level diversity as team mental model antecedents: implications for implicit coordination. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[14]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[15]  Il Im,et al.  An international comparison of technology adoption: Testing the UTAUT model , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Understanding the Influence of Team Climate on IT Use , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[18]  Hanna Schramm-Klein,et al.  Is It Human? The Role of Anthropomorphism as a Driver for the Successful Acceptance of Digital Voice Assistants , 2019, HICSS.

[19]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .

[20]  Jolanta Aritz,et al.  The Impact of Perceived Foreign Language Proficiency on Hybrid Team Culture , 2020 .

[21]  Joseph Kim,et al.  Improving Team's Consistency of Understanding in Meetings , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[22]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  Adoption of Sustainable Technologies: A Mixed-Methods Study of German Households , 2019, MIS Q..

[23]  Stefan Scherer,et al.  A Generic Platform for Training Social Skills with Adaptative Virtual Agents , 2018, AAMAS.

[24]  Andreas Janson,et al.  Classifying Smart Personal Assistants: An Empirical Cluster Analysis , 2019, HICSS.

[25]  Nicolae Nistor,et al.  Towards the integration of culture into the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[26]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: U.S. Vs. China , 2010 .

[27]  Helene Tenzer,et al.  Media choice in multilingual virtual teams , 2016 .

[28]  Annette Mills,et al.  The Effects of Communication Media and Culture on Deception Detection Accuracy , 2018, MIS Q..

[29]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict , 2006, MIS Q..

[30]  Sven Laumer,et al.  Job Seekers' Acceptance of Job Recommender Systems: Results of an Empirical Study , 2018, HICSS.

[31]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Culture , Leadership , and Organizations : The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies , 2022 .

[32]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Understanding the Role of Trust in Human-Autonomy Teaming , 2019, HICSS.

[33]  G. Hofstede.  Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context , 2011 .

[34]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Understanding mobile banking: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Jolanta Aritz,et al.  Language Proficiency and Media Synchronicity Theory: The Impact of Media Capabilities on Satisfaction and Inclusion in Multilingual Virtual Teams , 2019, HICSS.