Retrocausality at no extra cost

One obstacle faced by proposals of retrocausal influences in quantum mechanics is the perceived high conceptual cost of making such a proposal. I assemble here a metaphysical picture consistent with the possibility of retrocausality and not precluded by the known physical structure of our reality. This picture employs two relatively well-established positions—the block universe model of time and the interventionist account of causation—and requires the dismantling of our ordinary asymmetric causal intuition and our ordinary intuition about epistemic access to the past. The picture is then built upon an existing model of agent deliberation that permits us to strike a harmony between our causal intuitions and the fixity of the block universe view. I conclude that given the right mix of these reasonable metaphysical and epistemological ingredients there is no conceptual cost to such a retrocausal picture of quantum mechanics.

[1]  H. Price.  The philosophy and physics of affecting the past , 1984, Synthese.

[2]  Mathias Frisch.  No place for causes? Causal skepticism in physics , 2012 .

[3]  N. Hokkyo.  Variational formulation of transactional and related interpretations of quantum mechanics , 1988 .

[4]  H. Price.  Causal perspectivalism ∗ , 2005 .

[5]  H. Price.  Time-symmetry without retrocausality: how the quantum can withhold the solace , 2010 .

[6]  K. Wharton.  Lagrangian-Only Quantum Theory , 2013, 1301.7012.

[7]  C. W. Rietdijk.  Proof of a retroactive influence , 1978 .

[8]  Eric Winsberg,et al.  Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics , 2010 .

[9]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Ontology and ideology , 1951 .

[10]  K. Wharton.  A Novel Interpretation of the Klein-Gordon Equation , 2007, 0706.4075.

[11]  Huw Price,et al.  Causation, physics, and the constitution of reality : Russell's republic revisited , 2006 .

[12]  Huw Price,et al.  Action Duality: A Constructive Principle for Quantum Foundations , 2011, Symmetry.

[13]  H. Price.  Backward causation, hidden variables and the meaning of completeness , 2001 .

[14]  O. Costa de Beauregard.  Time symmetry and interpretation of quantum mechanics , 1976 .

[15]  Time-Symmetric Quantum Mechanics , 2007 .

[16]  Tim Maudlin,et al.  Quantum non-locality and relativity , 1994 .

[17]  Ken Wharton,et al.  The Universe Is Not a Computer , 2012, 1211.7081.

[18]  Causally Symmetric Bohm Model , 2006, quant-ph/0601095.

[19]  R. Spekkens.  Evidence for the epistemic view of quantum states: A toy theory , 2004, quant-ph/0401052.

[20]  D. Miller.  CONDITIONAL PROBABILITIES IN QUANTUM MECHANICS FROM A TIME-SYMMETRIC FORMULATION , 1997 .

[21]  Huw Price,et al.  New Slant on the EPR-Bell Experiment , 2010, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[22]  H. Price.  Does time-symmetry imply retrocausality? How the quantum world says “Maybe”? , 2010, 1002.0906.

[23]  Huw Price,et al.  Time's Arrow and Archimedes’ Point , 1997 .

[24]  R. Sutherland.  Density Formalism for Quantum Theory , 1998, 2001.05869.

[25]  R. Sutherland.  Bell's theorem and backwards-in-time causality , 1983 .

[26]  O. C. D. Beauregard.  Time symmetry and interpretation of quantum mechanics. [Paradoxes] , 1976 .

[27]  J. Cramer.  Generalized absorber theory and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1980 .

[28]  C. Glymour,et al.  Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation , 2004 .

[29]  Huw Price.  A Neglected Route to Realism about Quantum Mechanics , 1994 .

[30]  Time Symmetry in Microphysics , 1996, Philosophy of Science.

[31]  Mathias Frisch.  No Place for Causes , 2007 .

[32]  H. Price.  Toy Models for Retrocausality , 2008, 0802.3230.

[33]  Bell’s theorem and the causal arrow of time , 2008, 0807.2041.

[34]  H. Price.  Time's arrow and Archimedes' point new directions for the physics of time , 1997 .

[35]  D. Miller,et al.  Realism and time symmetry in quantum mechanics , 1996 .

[36]  O. C. D. Beauregard.  Time symmetry and the Einstein paradox , 1977 .