Investigating organizational learning in eGovernment projects: A multi-theoretic approach

Organizational learning is essential during eGovernment implementation to leverage the benefits of such efforts. However, there is a lack of holistic understanding of organizational learning in IT-related change in public organizations. Motivated by such concerns, we construct a structurational framework that inter-relates elements pertinent to IT-related change from four theoretical perspectives: organizational politics, organizational culture, institutional theory, and organizational learning itself. Inter-relationships between elements of these perspectives are explicated through the notions of structures, modalities, and actions from structuration theory. Guided by the framework, we conducted a case study to examine the organizational learning occurring during a successful eGovernment project. The analysis indicates the inextricable interactions between elements from the different perspectives during the project implementation. The proposed framework offers both theoretical and practical benefits for understanding and facilitating organizational learning in eGovernment projects.

[1]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[2]  G. Ritzer Structuration Theory , 2007 .

[3]  Jesper B. Sørensen The Strength of Corporate Culture and the Reliability of Firm Performance , 2002 .

[4]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[5]  J. March,et al.  Handbook of organizations , 1966 .

[6]  Michael S. H. Heng,et al.  An organizational learning perspective on information systems planning , 1994, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Transforming Work Through Information Technology: A Comparative Case Study of Geographic Information Systems in County Government , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[9]  A. Stinchcombe Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[10]  Lai Lai Tung,et al.  Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[12]  Peter J. Robertson,et al.  Outcomes of Planned Organizational Change in the Public Sector: A Meta-Analytic Comparison to the Private Sector , 1995 .

[13]  V. Murray,et al.  Illusions and Other Games: A Trifocal View of Organizational Politics , 1991 .

[14]  J. Dutton,et al.  KEEPING AN EYE ON THE MIRROR : IMAGE AND IDENTITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION , 2005 .

[15]  Jong-min Choe,et al.  The relationships among management accounting information, organizational learning and production performance , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[16]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[17]  Samar Mouakket,et al.  Varieties of Political Process During Systems Development , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  S. Ranson The Structuring of Organizational Structures. , 1980 .

[19]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  C. Bauer The Circuits-of-Power Framework for Studying Power in Institutionalization of Information Systems , 2003 .

[22]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The transformational dimension in the realization of business value from information technology , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Hans J. Morgenthau,et al.  Truth and Power , 2020, A Brief History of Fascist Lies.

[24]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Mark Easterby-Smith,et al.  Organizational learning: current debates and opportunities , 1999 .

[26]  Kees Boersma,et al.  From means to ends: The transformation of ERP in a manufacturing company , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Theories that Explain Contradiction: Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology , 1995, ICIS.

[28]  A. Giddens Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[29]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1999 .

[30]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[31]  Frank Blackler,et al.  Power, mastery and organizational learning. , 2000 .

[32]  Robin Fincham,et al.  PERSPECTIVES ON POWER: PROCESSUAL, INSTITUTIONAL AND ‘INTERNAL’FORMS OF ORGANIZATIONAL POWER , 1992 .

[33]  Marleen Huysman,et al.  Balancing Biases, A Critical Review of the Literature on Organizational Learning , 1998 .

[34]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Dynamic Theory of Expertise and Occupational Boundaries in New Technology Implementation: Building on Barley's Study of CT Scanning , 2004 .

[35]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[36]  Mark Easterby-Smith,et al.  Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: Developments in Theory and Practice , 1999 .

[37]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[38]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[39]  E. Trist,et al.  Renewing American Industry. , 1984 .

[40]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[41]  R. Bhagat Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[42]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Connie J. G. Gersick,et al.  Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research , 1994 .

[44]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[45]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Organizational learning and management information systems , 1982, DATB.

[47]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[48]  Michael K. Mauws,et al.  The Politics of Organizational Learning: Integrating Power into the 4I Framework , 2005 .

[49]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Architecture of Simplicity , 1993 .

[50]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[51]  E. Clemons,et al.  Newly vulnerable markets in an age of pure information products: an analysis of online music and online news , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[52]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[53]  David Held,et al.  Social theory of modern societies : Anthony Giddens and his critics , 1989 .

[54]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[55]  Patrick Baert,et al.  Social Theory in the Twentieth Century , 1998 .

[56]  Monika I. Winn,et al.  The Temporal Dynamics of Institutionalization , 2001 .

[57]  James Backhouse,et al.  The Circuits-of-Power Framework for Studying Power in Institutionalization of Information Systems , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[58]  R. Hall Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes , 1987 .

[59]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation , 2005, MIS Q..

[60]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[61]  Karen L. Newman Organizational Transformation During Institutional Upheaval , 2000 .

[62]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  Organizational Design Types, Tracks and the Dynamics of Strategic Change , 1988 .

[63]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[64]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Power and Information Technology Research: A Metatriangulation Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[65]  Christina Soh,et al.  IT2000: A critical appraisal of Singapore's state-wide strategic planning process for information technology , 1993, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[66]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[67]  Sten Jönsson Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[68]  Roger H. Hallowell,et al.  Transforming Singapore's Public Libraries , 2001 .

[69]  A. Stinchcombe Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[70]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Strategic Knowledge Networks: The Case of IT Support for Eurojuris Law Firms in Norway , 2000 .

[71]  M. Hatch The Dynamics of Organizational Culture , 1993 .

[72]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Business Process Reengineering in the Public Sector: The Case of the Housing Development Board in Singapore , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[73]  W. Richard Scott Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems , 1981 .

[74]  J. Dutton,et al.  Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .

[75]  Julianne Mahler Influences of Organizational Culture on Learning in Public Agencies , 1997 .

[76]  Å. Grönlund Electronic Government: Design, Applications and Management , 2001 .