It is shown that any recognition problem solved by a polynomial time-bounded nondeterministic Turing machine can be “reduced” to the problem of determining whether a given propositional formula is a tautology. Here “reduced” means, roughly speaking, that the first problem can be solved deterministically in polynomial time provided an oracle is available for solving the second. From this notion of reducible, polynomial degrees of difficulty are defined, and it is shown that the problem of determining tautologyhood has the same polynomial degree as the problem of determining whether the first of two given graphs is isomorphic to a subgraph of the second. Other examples are discussed. A method of measuring the complexity of proof procedures for the predicate calculus is introduced and discussed.
[1]
Hilary Putnam,et al.
A Computing Procedure for Quantification Theory
,
1960,
JACM.
[2]
D. Kreider,et al.
PREDICTABLY COMPUTABLE FUNCTIONALS AND DEFINITION BY RECURSION
,
1964
.
[3]
Stephen A. Cook,et al.
Review: Alan Cobham, Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, The Intrinsic Computational Difficulty of Functions
,
1969
.
[4]
Jeffrey D. Ullman,et al.
Formal languages and their relation to automata
,
1969,
Addison-Wesley series in computer science and information processing.
[5]
D. Corneil,et al.
An Efficient Algorithm for Graph Isomorphism
,
1970,
JACM.
[6]
Stephen A. Cook,et al.
Characterizations of Pushdown Machines in Terms of Time-Bounded Computers
,
1971,
J. ACM.