Parameter fitting for piano sound synthesis by physical modeling.

A difficult issue in the synthesis of piano tones by physical models is to choose the values of the parameters governing the hammer-string model. In fact, these parameters are hard to estimate from static measurements, causing the synthesis sounds to be unrealistic. An original approach that estimates the parameters of a piano model, from the measurement of the string vibration, by minimizing a perceptual criterion is proposed. The minimization process that was used is a combination of a gradient method and a simulated annealing algorithm, in order to avoid convergence problems in case of multiple local minima. The criterion, based on the tristimulus concept, takes into account the spectral energy density in three bands, each allowing particular parameters to be estimated. The optimization process has been run on signals measured on an experimental setup. The parameters thus estimated provided a better sound quality than the one obtained using a global energetic criterion. Both the sound's attack and its brightness were better preserved. This quality gain was obtained for parameter values very close to the initial ones, showing that only slight deviations are necessary to make synthetic sounds closer to the real ones.

[1]  Anders Askenfelt,et al.  Piano string excitation V: Spectra for real hammers and strings , 1988 .

[2]  Richard Kronland-Martinet,et al.  Resynthesis of Coupled Piano String Vibrations Based on Physical Modeling , 2001 .

[3]  Matti Karjalainen,et al.  Audibility of Inharmonicity in String Instrument Sounds, and Implications to Digital Sound Synthesis , 1999, ICMC.

[4]  Nicholas J. Giordano,et al.  Mechanical impedance of a piano soundboard , 1998 .

[5]  Pierre Ruiz,et al.  Synthesizing Musical Sounds by Solving the Wave Equation for Vibrating Objects: Part 2 , 1971 .

[6]  K. H. Hunt,et al.  Coefficient of Restitution Interpreted as Damping in Vibroimpact , 1975 .

[7]  Gabriel Weinreich,et al.  The Coupled Motions of Piano Strings , 1979 .

[8]  D. Hall,et al.  Piano string excitation. VI: Nonlinear modeling , 1992 .

[9]  Sølvi Ystad Sound modeling applied to flute sounds , 2000 .

[10]  Richard Kronland-Martinet,et al.  The simulation of piano string vibration: from physical models to finite difference schemes and digital waveguides. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  F. Avanzini,et al.  Musical instrument modeling: the case of the piano , 2001 .

[12]  Gabriel Weinreich,et al.  Coupled piano strings , 1977 .

[13]  Xavier Boutillon Model for Piano hammers: Exper-imental Determination and Digital Simulation , 1988 .

[14]  A. Chaigne,et al.  Numerical simulations of piano strings. II. Comparisons with measurements and systematic exploration of some hammer‐string parameters , 1994 .

[15]  A. Chaigne,et al.  Numerical simulations of piano strings. I. A physical model for a struck string using finite difference methods , 1994 .

[16]  A. Stulov Hysteretic model of the grand piano hammer felt , 1995 .

[17]  Richard Kronland-Martinet,et al.  Perceptive and Cognitive Evaluation of a Piano Synthesis Model , 2004, CMMR.

[18]  Gabriel Weinreich,et al.  Coupled piano strings , 1977 .

[19]  Richard Kronland-Martinet,et al.  A Hybrid Resynthesis Model for Hammer-String Interaction of Piano Tones , 2004, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..