Regulatory networks and connected components of the neutral space

Abstract. The functioning of a living cell is largely determined by the structure of its regulatory network, comprising non-linear interactions between regulatory genes. An important factor for the stability and evolvability of such regulatory systems is neutrality – typically a large number of alternative network structures give rise to the necessary dynamics. Here we study the discretized regulatory dynamics of the yeast cell cycle [Li et al., PNAS, 2004] and the set of networks capable of reproducing it, which we call functional. Among these, the empirical yeast wildtype network is close to optimal with respect to sparse wiring. Under point mutations, which establish or delete single interactions, the neutral space of functional networks is fragmented into ≈ 4.7 × 108 components. One of the smaller ones contains the wildtype network. On average, functional networks reachable from the wildtype by mutations are sparser, have higher noise resilience and fewer fixed point attractors as compared with networks outside of this wildtype component.

[1]  A. Wagner Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems , 2005 .

[2]  W. Imrich,et al.  Product Graphs: Structure and Recognition , 2000 .

[3]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  P. Stadler,et al.  Neutral networks in protein space: a computational study based on knowledge-based potentials of mean force. , 1997, Folding & design.

[5]  P. Schuster,et al.  From sequences to shapes and back: a case study in RNA secondary structures , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  K. Holsinger The neutral theory of molecular evolution , 2004 .

[7]  A. Wagner Robustness, evolvability, and neutrality , 2005, FEBS letters.

[8]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  Function constrains network architecture and dynamics: a case study on the yeast cell cycle Boolean network. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Barbara Drossel,et al.  Random Boolean Networks , 2007, 0706.3351.

[10]  Michael Ruogu Zhang,et al.  Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[11]  E. Hill Journal of Theoretical Biology , 1961, Nature.

[12]  Heinz Georg Schuster,et al.  Reviews of nonlinear dynamics and complexity , 2008 .

[13]  M. Feder Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems. Princeton Studies in Complexity.By Andreas Wagner. Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press. $49.50. xv + 367 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0–691–12240–7. 2005. , 2006 .

[14]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Robustness Can Evolve Gradually in Complex Regulatory Gene Networks with Varying Topology , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  A. Wagner,et al.  Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Kim Sneppen,et al.  NEUTRAL MUTATIONS AND PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM IN EVOLVING GENETIC NETWORKS , 1997, physics/9708026.

[17]  Johannes Berg,et al.  Adaptive gene regulatory networks , 2009 .

[18]  E. Davidson,et al.  Gene regulatory networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  E. Kandel,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Annual subject and author indexes. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.

[21]  Q. Ouyang,et al.  The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.