Pollination decays in biodiversity hotspots.

As pollinators decline globally, competition for their services is expected to intensify, and this antagonism may be most severe where the number of plant species is the greatest. Using meta-analysis and comparative phylogenetic analysis, we provide a global-scale test of whether reproduction becomes more limited by pollen receipt (pollen limitation) as the number of coexisting plant species increases. As predicted, we find a significant positive relationship between pollen limitation and species richness. In addition, this pattern is particularly strong for species that are obligately outcrossing and for trees relative to herbs or shrubs. We suggest that plants occurring in species-rich communities may be more prone to pollen limitation because of interspecific competition for pollinators. As a consequence, plants in biodiversity hotspots may have a higher risk of extinction and/or experience increased selection pressure to specialize on certain pollinators or diversify into different phenological niches. The combination of higher pollen limitation and habitat destruction represents a dual risk to tropical plant species that has not been previously identified.

[1]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Pollen Limitation of Plant Reproduction: Pattern and Process , 2005 .

[2]  M. Chase,et al.  Environment, Area, and Diversification in the Species‐Rich Flowering Plant Family Iridaceae , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[3]  J. Thompson.  The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution , 2005 .

[4]  Brent C. Emerson,et al.  Species diversity can drive speciation , 2005, Nature.

[5]  R. Mitchell,et al.  INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION FOR POLLINATION LOWERS SEED PRODUCTION AND OUTCROSSING IN MIMULUS RINGENS , 2005 .

[6]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics , 2005 .

[7]  B. Crespi,et al.  Vicious circles: positive feedback in major evolutionary and ecological transitions. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  C. I. Peter,et al.  Fruiting failure and limited recruitment in remnant populations of the hawkmoth-pollinated tree Oxyanthus pyriformis subsp. pyriformis (Rubiaceae) , 2004 .

[9]  T. Ricketts.  Tropical Forest Fragments Enhance Pollinator Activity in Nearby Coffee Crops , 2004 .

[10]  T. Palmer,et al.  Competition and Coexistence: Exploring Mechanisms That Restrict and Maintain Diversity within Mutualist Guilds , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[11]  CONTRASTING FLOWERING PHENOLOGY AND SPECIES RICHNESS IN ABIOTICALLY AND BIOTICALLY POLLINATED ANGIOSPERMS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  M. Rees,et al.  Coexistence and Relative Abundance in Annual Plant Assemblages: The Roles of Competition and Colonization , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN PLANT–POLLINATOR MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS , 2002 .

[14]  C. Wilcock,et al.  Pollination failure in plants: why it happens and when it matters. , 2002, Trends in plant science.

[15]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  L. Chittka,et al.  Successful invasion of a floral market , 2001, Nature.

[17]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Meta-analysis in ecology , 2001 .

[18]  Comparative Analysis of Character Displacement and Spatial Adaptations as Illustrated by the Evolution of Dalechampia Blossoms , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[19]  J. Thompson.  Coevolution and Escalation: Are Ongoing Coevolutionary Meanderings Important? , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[20]  David W. Inouye,et al.  ENDANGERED MUTUALISMS: The Conservation of Plant-Pollinator Interactions , 1998 .

[21]  F. Maytag.  Evolution , 1996, Arch. Mus. Informatics.

[22]  C. Herrera.  Floral Biology, Microclimate, and Pollination by Ectothermic Bees in an Early‐Blooming Herb , 1995 .

[23]  T. Garland,et al.  Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992 .

[24]  T. Givnish,et al.  Staggered Flowering in the Dipterocarpaceae: New Insights Into Floral Induction and the Evolution of Mast Fruiting in the Aseasonal Tropics , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[25]  B. Rathcke,et al.  Phenological Patterns of Terrestrial Plants , 1985 .

[26]  D. Campbell,et al.  The Mechanism of Competition for Pollination between Two Forest Herbs , 1985 .

[27]  T. Mosquin.  Competition for pollinators as a stimulus for the evolution of flowering time , 1971 .

[28]  W. Anderson,et al.  Competition for Pollinators between Simultaneously Flowering Species , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[29]  S. Goldhor.  Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.