Open Access Research Article Transcriptional Changes in Response to X Chromosome Dosage in the Mouse: Implications for X Inactivation and the Molecular Basis of Turner Syndrome

BackgroundX monosomic mice (39,XO) have a remarkably mild phenotype when compared to women with Turner syndrome (45,XO). The generally accepted hypothesis to explain this discrepancy is that the number of genes on the mouse X chromosome which escape X inactivation, and thus are expressed at higher levels in females, is very small. However this hypothesis has never been tested and only a small number of genes have been assayed for their X-inactivation status in the mouse. We performed a global expression analysis in four somatic tissues (brain, liver, kidney and muscle) of adult 40,XX and 39,XO mice using the Illumina Mouse WG-6 v1_1 Expression BeadChip and an extensive validation by quantitative real time PCR, in order to identify which genes are expressed from both X chromosomes.ResultsWe identified several genes on the X chromosome which are overexpressed in XX females, including those previously reported as escaping X inactivation, as well as new candidates. However, the results obtained by microarray and qPCR were not fully concordant, illustrating the difficulty in ascertaining modest fold changes, such as those expected for genes escaping X inactivation. Remarkably, considerable variation was observed between tissues, suggesting that inactivation patterns may be tissue-dependent. Our analysis also exposed several autosomal genes involved in mitochondrial metabolism and in protein translation which are differentially expressed between XX and XO mice, revealing secondary transcriptional changes to the alteration in X chromosome dosage.ConclusionsOur results support the prediction that the mouse inactive X chromosome is largely silent, while providing a list of the genes potentially escaping X inactivation in rodents. Although the lower expression of X-linked genes in XO mice may not be relevant in the particular tissues/systems which are affected in human X chromosome monosomy, genes deregulated in XO mice are good candidates for further study in an involvement in Turner Syndrome phenotype.

[1]  Yoav Benjamini,et al.  Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures , 2003, Bioinform..

[2]  J. Davis Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor , 2007 .

[3]  S. Gartler,et al.  Dosage of the Sts gene in the mouse. , 1986, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  A. Monaco,et al.  The UTX gene escapes X inactivation in mice and humans. , 1998, Human molecular genetics.

[5]  William Davies,et al.  Effects on fear reactivity in XO mice are due to haploinsufficiency of a non-PAR X gene: implications for emotional function in Turner's syndrome. , 2004, Human molecular genetics.

[6]  Edith Heard,et al.  Recent advances in X-chromosome inactivation. , 2004, Current opinion in cell biology.

[7]  T. Shioda,et al.  X inactivation in the mouse embryo deficient for Dnmt1: distinct effect of hypomethylation on imprinted and random X inactivation. , 2000, Developmental biology.

[8]  Emmanouil T Dermitzakis,et al.  Large-Scale Population Study of Human Cell Lines Indicates that Dosage Compensation Is Virtually Complete , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[9]  R. Jones Identification of a cluster of X-linked imprinted genes in mice , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[10]  Christine M Disteche,et al.  Dosage compensation of the active X chromosome in mammals , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[11]  C. Disteche,et al.  Escape from X inactivation in human and mouse. , 1995, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  C. Disteche,et al.  Escape from X inactivation , 2003, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[13]  Zohreh Talebizadeh,et al.  X chromosome gene expression in human tissues: male and female comparisons. , 2006, Genomics.

[14]  William Davies,et al.  Xlr3b is a new imprinted candidate for X-linked parent-of-origin effects on cognitive function in mice , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[15]  A. Agulnik,et al.  A novel X gene with a widely transcribed Y-linked homologue escapes X-inactivation in mouse and human. , 1994, Human molecular genetics.

[16]  C. Disteche,et al.  Sex-Specific Differences in Expression of Histone Demethylases Utx and Uty in Mouse Brain and Neurons , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  X chromosome dosage compensation: how mammals keep the balance. , 2008, Annual review of genetics.

[18]  A. Arnold,et al.  Tissue-specific expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. , 2006, Genome research.

[19]  C. Disteche,et al.  Comparative sequence and x-inactivation analyses of a domain of escape in human xp11.2 and the conserved segment in mouse. , 2004, Genome research.

[20]  Robert Nadon,et al.  Comparison of small n statistical tests of differential expression applied to microarrays , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[21]  F. V. Van Dolah,et al.  Microarray validation: factors influencing correlation between oligonucleotide microarrays and real-time PCR , 2006, Biological Procedures Online.

[22]  Pan Du,et al.  lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray , 2008, Bioinform..

[23]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Dosage Compensation in the Mouse Balances Up-Regulation and Silencing of X-Linked Genes , 2007, PLoS biology.

[24]  H. Willard,et al.  Tissue and lineage-specific variation in inactive X chromosome expression of the murine Smcx gene. , 1996, Human molecular genetics.

[25]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: regularized t -test and statistical inferences of gene changes , 2001, Bioinform..

[26]  C. Disteche,et al.  Escapees on the X chromosome. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R. Schiffmann,et al.  Ovarian failure related to eukaryotic initiation factor 2B mutations. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[28]  C. Disteche,et al.  Boundaries between chromosomal domains of X inactivation and escape bind CTCF and lack CpG methylation during early development. , 2005, Developmental cell.

[29]  M. Monk,et al.  X-chromosome activity in female mouse embryos heterozygous for Pgk-1 and Searle's translocation, T(X; 16) 16H. , 1983, Genetical research.

[30]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Characterization of genes encoding translation initiation factor eIF-2gamma in mouse and human: sex chromosome localization, escape from X-inactivation and evolution. , 1998, Human molecular genetics.

[31]  A. Arnold,et al.  Sexually dimorphic expression of Usp9x is related to sex chromosome complement in adult mouse brain , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[32]  Neil Brockdorff,et al.  Enox, a novel gene that maps 10 kb upstream of Xist and partially escapes X inactivation. , 2002, Genomics.

[33]  Rafael A. Irizarry,et al.  Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor , 2005 .

[34]  William Davies,et al.  X-Monosomy Effects on Visuospatial Attention in Mice: A Candidate Gene and Implications for Turner Syndrome and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[35]  Gordon K. Smyth,et al.  limma: Linear Models for Microarray Data , 2005 .

[36]  Jennifer A. Erwin,et al.  New twists in X-chromosome inactivation. , 2008, Current opinion in cell biology.

[37]  C. Disteche,et al.  Sex-Specific Expression of the X-Linked Histone Demethylase Gene Jarid1c in Brain , 2008, PloS one.

[38]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Epigenetic predisposition to expression of TIMP1 from the human inactive X chromosome , 2005, BMC Genetics.

[39]  H. Willard,et al.  X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females , 2005, Nature.

[40]  W. Huber,et al.  Model-based variance-stabilizing transformation for Illumina microarray data , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  A. Arnold,et al.  Sexually dimorphic expression of the X-linked gene Eif2s3x mRNA but not protein in mouse brain. , 2006, Gene expression patterns : GEP.

[42]  Edith Heard,et al.  High-resolution analysis of epigenetic changes associated with X inactivation. , 2009, Genome research.

[43]  N. Brockdorff,et al.  The mouse Smcx gene exhibits developmental and tissue specific variation in degree of escape from X inactivation. , 1996, Human molecular genetics.

[44]  J. Rinn,et al.  Major molecular differences between mammalian sexes are involved in drug metabolism and renal function. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[45]  A. Arnold,et al.  Sex differences in sex chromosome gene expression in mouse brain. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[46]  S. Gartler,et al.  Evidence for X-linkage of steroid sulfatase in the mouse: steroid sulfatase levels in oocytes of XX and XO mice. , 1983, Genetics.

[47]  Eric E Schadt,et al.  Elucidating the role of gonadal hormones in sexually dimorphic gene coexpression networks. , 2009, Endocrinology.

[48]  B. Cattanach,et al.  X-inactivation of the Sts locus in the mouse: an anomaly of the dosage compensation mechanism. , 1989, Genetical research.

[49]  W. Davies,et al.  The 39,XO mouse as a model for the neurobiology of Turner syndrome and sex-biased neuropsychiatric disorders , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.