Multiobjective planning for naval mine counter measures missions

Near-optimal scheduling and allocation for DoD missions is complicated by many factors, including multiple measures of effectiveness, mixed-initiatives, heterogeneity of systems and non-uniformity of homogenous systems; these factors contribute to a complex planning problem with non-linear, combinatorial, and continuous components that is further complicated by information uncertainty. In Navy, mine counter measure missions, planning entails components of the vehicle routing problem with time windows and flexible flowshop scheduling with pre-emptive maintenance. We present a multiobjective mine counter measures problem formulation and describe the non-dominated scheduler, a scheduling programme that parametrically explores continuous dimensions of the decision space, stochastically samples from exponentially large decision spaces, and uses surrogate metrics to bound computational complexity. This provides mission commander with a non-dominated set of alternative plans. This scheduler has been integrated into existing tools and is being evaluated by the US Navy for extension and integration into next-generation mine warfare decision aids.

[1]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[2]  Kay Chen Tan,et al.  A Hybrid Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm for Solving Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows , 2003, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[3]  Nima Safaei,et al.  Workforce-constrained maintenance scheduling for military aircraft fleet: a case study , 2011, Ann. Oper. Res..

[4]  Yuan Yuan,et al.  Path selection model and algorithm for emergency logistics management , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[5]  Funda Samanlioglu,et al.  A memetic random-key genetic algorithm for a symmetric multi-objective traveling salesman problem , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[6]  István Borgulya,et al.  An algorithm for the capacitated vehicle routing problem with route balancing , 2008, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  João C. N. Clímaco,et al.  Traffic splitting in MPLS networks - a hierarchical multicriteria approach , 2007 .

[8]  Joaquín A. Pacheco,et al.  Tabu search for a multi-objective routing problem , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  Mohammad Saadatseresht,et al.  Evacuation planning using multiobjective evolutionary optimization approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Cigdem Alabas-Uslu A self-tuning heuristic for a multi-objective vehicle routing problem , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A multi-criteria vehicle-target allocation assessment model for network-centric Joint Air Operations , 2008 .

[12]  Éric D. Taillard,et al.  Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems , 1993 .

[13]  George Mavrotas,et al.  Solving multiobjective, multiconstraint knapsack problems using mathematical programming and evolutionary algorithms , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A multiple criteria decision support system for autonomous underwater vehicle mission planning and control , 2010 .

[15]  Shashi Phoha,et al.  A high-fidelity ocean sampling mobile network (SAMON) simulator testbed for evaluating intelligent control of unmanned underwater vehicles , 2001 .

[16]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  An efficient multi-vehicle multi-criteria mission planning and control system for autonomous underwater vehicles , 2010 .