Portable Perimetry Using Eye-Tracking on a Tablet Computer—A Feasibility Assessment
暂无分享,去创建一个
David P. Crabb | Nicholas D. Smith | Pete R. Jones | Wei Bi | D. Crabb | Nicholas D Smith | W. Bi | Pete R. Jones
[1] L. Frisén. Performance of a Rapid Rarebit Central-Vision Test with Optic Neuropathies , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.
[2] Chris A Johnson,et al. Performance of an iPad Application to Detect Moderate and Advanced Visual Field Loss in Nepal. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.
[3] Michael Dorr,et al. Visual Psychophysics and Physiological Optics Rapid and Reliable Assessment of the Contrast Sensitivity Function on an iPad , 2013 .
[4] Terry L. Schwartz,et al. Kinetic perimetry assessment of binocular visual field shape and size in young infants , 1987, Vision Research.
[5] P. Brusini,et al. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.
[6] M. L. Salvetat,et al. Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.
[7] R P Mills,et al. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.
[8] B Thompson,et al. An assessment of the iPad as a testing platform for distance visual acuity in adults , 2013, BMJ Open.
[9] Geraint Rees,et al. Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease , 2018, Nature Medicine.
[10] Ian J. Murray,et al. Development and testing of an automated computer tablet-based method for self-testing of high and low contrast near visual acuity in ophthalmic patients , 2016, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
[11] C. Johnson,et al. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[12] Malcolm Ryan,et al. Normative values for a tablet computer-based application to assess chromatic contrast sensitivity , 2018, Behavior research methods.
[13] C. Matsumoto,et al. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix. , 2006, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.
[14] Alexander Klistorner,et al. Performance of iPad‐based threshold perimetry in glaucoma and controls , 2018, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.
[15] Algis J. Vingrys,et al. Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter , 2016, Translational vision science & technology.
[16] Antonios Perperidis,et al. Feasibility, Accuracy, and Repeatability of Suprathreshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry , 2016, Translational vision science & technology.
[17] David P Crabb,et al. Disease severity in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients with visual field loss: trends from more than a decade of data , 2015, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.
[18] Anders Heijl,et al. Trained Artificial Neural Network for Glaucoma Diagnosis Using Visual Field Data: A Comparison With Conventional Algorithms , 2007, Journal of glaucoma.
[19] C. Johnson,et al. Frequency doubling perimetry and the detection of eye disease in the community. , 2000, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.
[20] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[21] Angela L. Duckworth,et al. Advanced, Analytic, Automated (AAA) Measurement of Engagement During Learning , 2017, Educational psychologist.
[22] Yu Xiang George Kong,et al. Can Home Monitoring Allow Earlier Detection of Rapid Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma? , 2017, Ophthalmology.
[23] Allison M McKendrick,et al. Measurement of Retinal Sensitivity on Tablet Devices in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. , 2015, Translational vision science & technology.
[24] Juan A. Monsoriu,et al. Stereopsis assessment at multiple distances with an iPad application , 2017, Displays.
[25] David B Henson,et al. Monitoring vigilance during perimetry by using pupillography. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[26] Stephen J. Dain,et al. Evaluation of tablet computers for visual function assessment , 2017, Behavior research methods.
[27] A. Vingrys,et al. Tablets at the bedside - iPad-based visual field test used in the diagnosis of Intrasellar Haemangiopericytoma: a case report , 2017, BMC Ophthalmology.
[28] H. Hussin,et al. Performance of the 24-2-5 frequency doubling technology screening test: a prospective case study , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.
[29] Agostino Gibaldi,et al. Evaluation of the Tobii EyeX Eye tracking controller and Matlab toolkit for research , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.
[30] H. Quigley,et al. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020 , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.
[31] H. Quigley. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.
[32] H. Brash,et al. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking. , 2009, Ophthalmology.
[33] Andrew J. Tatham,et al. Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability , 2017, Translational vision science & technology.
[34] A. Hofman,et al. Prevalence and causes of visual field loss in the elderly and associations with impairment in daily functioning: the Rotterdam Study. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.
[35] A Heijl,et al. Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.
[36] D. Crabb,et al. Cases of advanced visual field loss at referral to glaucoma clinics – more men than women? , 2017, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.
[37] Y. Kong,et al. Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.
[38] D. Teller. The forced-choice preferential looking procedure: A psychophysical technique for use with human infants. , 1979 .
[39] Zhong-Lin Lu,et al. Evaluation of the precision of contrast sensitivity function assessment on a tablet device , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[40] Y. Kong,et al. A Comparison of Perimetric Results from a Tablet Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients , 2016, Translational vision science & technology.
[41] Zhao-Tian Zhang,et al. A Pilot Trial of the Ipad Tablet Computer as a Portable Device for Visual Acuity Testing , 2013, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.
[42] Lars Frisén,et al. Self-Testing of Vision in Age-Related Macula Degeneration: A Longitudinal Pilot Study Using a Smartphone-Based Rarebit Test , 2015, Journal of ophthalmology.
[43] A. Bastawrous,et al. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork. , 2015, JAMA ophthalmology.
[44] Robert Ritch,et al. Initial arcuate defects within the central 10 degrees in glaucoma. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[45] Marko Nardini,et al. Automated measurement of resolution acuity in infants using remote eye-tracking. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[46] Ian J. Murray,et al. Optimisation and Assessment of Three Modern Touch Screen Tablet Computers for Clinical Vision Testing , 2014, PloS one.
[47] Donald C. Hood,et al. Glaucomatous damage of the macula , 2013, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.
[48] Jost B Jonas,et al. Prevalence and causes of visual field loss as determined by frequency doubling perimetry in urban and rural adult Chinese. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.
[49] Karen Bandeen-Roche,et al. Grating visual acuity using the preferential-looking method in elderly nursing home residents. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[50] Chee-Fang Chin,et al. Rarebit perimetry: normative values and test–retest variability , 2011, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.
[51] A Heijl,et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.
[52] R. Webster,et al. Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems , 1990, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..
[53] Ronnie George,et al. Comparison of saccadic reaction time between normal and glaucoma using an eye movement perimeter , 2014, Indian journal of ophthalmology.
[54] Armin Toepfer,et al. Perimetry While Moving the Eyes: Implications for the Variability of Visual Field Defects , 2008, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.
[55] Brian A. Francis,et al. Testing of Visual Field with Virtual Reality Goggles in Manual and Visual Grasp Modes , 2014, BioMed research international.
[56] C Bunce,et al. Deprivation and late presentation of glaucoma: case-control study , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[57] Laura Remón,et al. Designing a new test for contrast sensitivity function measurement with iPad. , 2015, Journal of optometry.
[58] David P Crabb,et al. A qualitative investigation into patients’ views on visual field testing for glaucoma monitoring , 2014, BMJ Open.
[59] Gijs Thepass,et al. Validity and Repeatability of Saccadic Response Times Across the Visual Field in Eye Movement Perimetry. , 2013, Translational vision science & technology.