Browsing while reading: effects of instructional design and learners’ prior knowledge

One of the key reasons that multimedia, and particularly hypertext systems, are gaining in importance is that they inspire hopes of optimizing learners’ processes of knowledge construction. The present study is concerned with the respective influence of individual learner variables (i.e. particularly domain-specific prior knowledge) on the use of different design attributes. Thirty-six university students worked through a hierarchically structured two-part hypertext about the psychology of memory under two experimental browsing conditions (reduced versus free browsing). Results show that deeper-level comprehension (i.e. structural knowledge) was predicted by the interaction of experimental condition and prior knowledge, but that simply retaining facts was not. Participants with low prior knowledge performed better on the comprehension test if they had worked on the version with reduced access. Moreover, the version with reduced access helped to reduce feelings of disorientation. The measure of disorientation also appeared to be closely linked with the individual’s computer experience, self-concept of computer ability and subject-related interest. The main implications for educational practice relate to the design of an adaptive multimedia and hypertext learning system and the successful learning with it. DOI: 10.1080/09687760600668602

[1]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[2]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[3]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[4]  Wilhelmina C. Savenye,et al.  Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students' learning in a hypertext environment , 1994 .

[5]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitude and instructional methods , 1977 .

[6]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Effects of Text Structure and Prior Knowledge of the Learner on Navigation in Hypertext , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey , 1987, Computer.

[8]  A. Dillon,et al.  Hypermedia as an Educational Technology: A Review of the Quantitative Research Literature on Learner Comprehension, Control, and Style , 1998 .

[9]  Robert E. Horn,et al.  Mapping hypertext : the analysis, organization, and display of knowledge for the next generation of on-line text and graphics , 1989 .

[10]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from hypermedia , 2000 .

[11]  Ray McAleese,et al.  Navigation and Browsing in Hypertext , 1999, UK Hypertext.

[12]  Polle Zellweger,et al.  Scripted documents: a hypermedia path mechanism , 1989, Hypertext.

[13]  Anand K. Gramopadhye,et al.  An evaluation of different navigational tools in using hypertext , 1995 .

[14]  Robert E. Beasley,et al.  Cognitive mapping architectures and hypermedia disorientation: an empirical study , 1995 .

[15]  Nick Hammond,et al.  A Learning Support Environment: The Hitch-Hiker's Guide , 1988, UK Hypertext.

[16]  P. Alexander,et al.  The Role of Subject-Matter Knowledge and Interest in the Processing of Linear and Nonlinear Texts , 1994 .

[17]  Shoshana Loeb,et al.  Information filtering , 1992, CACM.

[18]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  Cognitive Effects of a Structural Overview in a Hypertext , 1999, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Thiemo Müller-Kalthoff,et al.  The Effects of Graphical Overviews, Prior Knowledge, and Self-Concept on Hypertext Disorientation and Learning Achievement , 2003 .

[20]  Wilfried Lemahieu,et al.  Context-based navigation in the Web by means of dynamically generated guided tours , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[21]  Rolf Plötzner,et al.  Unterstützung der Verarbeitung externer Repräsentationen am Beispiel des Lernens mit Hypertexten , 2001 .

[22]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Multimedia and Hypertext: The Internet and Beyond , 1995 .

[23]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Space - the Final Chapter or Why Physical Representations are not Semantic Intentions , 1993 .

[24]  Jens Möller,et al.  Zum Effekt unterschiedlicher Navigationshilfen beim Lernen mit Hypertexten The Effects of Different Graphical Overviews on Hypertext Learning Achievement , 2005 .

[25]  Michael C. McKenna,et al.  Handbook of Literacy and Technology : Transformations in A Post-typographic World , 1998 .

[26]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  Effects of content representation and readers' prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns. , 1992 .

[28]  O. Köller,et al.  Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the internal/external frame of reference model. , 2001 .

[29]  Jakob Nielsen Hypertext auf dem Internet , 1996 .

[30]  D. Jonassen Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? , 1991 .

[31]  P. Chandler,et al.  Assimilating complex information , 2002 .

[32]  Friedrich W. Hesse,et al.  The Use of Hypertext for Learning , 1999 .

[33]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[34]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  SUPPORTING VISUAL AND VERBAL LEARNING PREFERENCES IN A SECOND LANGUAGE MULTIMEDIA LEARNING ENVIRONMENT , 1998 .