Early skin reactions in head and neck malignancy treated by twice-daily fractionated radiotherapy--estimation of alpha/beta of LQ model.

Conventional radiotherapy, the five times a week regime, fails to achieve locoregional control in a large proportion of advanced carcinomas of head and neck and cervix. Different non-conventional fractionation schedules are being investigated to improve the tumour control rate but, during treatment of advanced malignancy with curative intent, it is seldom possible to deliver a radical dose to the tumour because of the constraint of inducing irreparable normal tissue complications. To compare the probability of occurrence of normal tissue damage and gain in therapeutic ratio various empirical models such as NSD, TDF, CRE and TSD have been suggested, and recently the linear quadratic (LQ) model has been gaining popularity and is claimed to be superior to earlier empirical models. We have studied twice-daily fractionated schedules in head and neck malignancy with the aim of estimating the alpha/beta value of the LQ model for early acute skin effects, and found it to be 9.16 Gy, 7.66 Gy and 8.59 Gy for mild erythema, intensive erythema and dry desquamation respectively.

[1]  D. E. Herbert What next in fractionated radiotherapy? , 1987, Investigative radiology.

[2]  V. Svoboda Radiotherapy by several sessions a day. , 1975, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Albrecht M. Kellerer,et al.  THEORY OF DUAL RADIATION ACTION. , 1972 .

[4]  J F Fowler,et al.  The effect of multiple small doses of x rays on skin reactions in the mouse and a basic interpretation. , 1976, Radiation research.

[5]  G. Barendsen,et al.  Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  P. Lindgren,et al.  Influence of Nalorphine on the Sphincter of Oddi Studied by Roentgencinematography , 1961 .

[7]  J. Fowler The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. , 1989, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  C. Orton,et al.  A simplification in the use of the NSD concept in practical radiotherapy. , 1973, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  R. W. Boer The use of the D versus dD plot to estimate the αβ ratio from iso-effect radiation damage data , 1988 .

[10]  H. Withers Biologic basis for altered fractionation schemes , 1985, Cancer.

[11]  G. Fletcher,et al.  Accelerated fractionation vs hyperfractionation: rationales for several treatments per day. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  S. Tucker Tests for the fit of the linear-quadratic model to radiation isoeffect data. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  I. Turesson,et al.  The influence of the overall treatment time in radiotherapy on the acute reaction: comparison of the effects of daily and twice-a-week fractionation on human skin. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  G H Fletcher,et al.  Changes in early and late radiation responses with altered dose fractionation: implications for dose-survival relationships. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  W. M. Gray,et al.  Cumulative radiation effect part I: Fractionated treatment regimes , 1971 .