Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Promotes Invadopodia Activity

Invadopodia are actin-rich subcellular protrusions with associated proteases used by cancer cells to degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) [1]. Molecular components of invadopodia include branched actin-assembly proteins, membrane trafficking proteins, signaling proteins, and transmembrane proteinases [1]. Similar structures exist in nontransformed cells, such as osteoclasts and dendritic cells, but are generally called podosomes and are thought to be more involved in cell-matrix adhesion than invadopodia [2-4]. Despite intimate contact with their ECM substrates, it is unknown whether physical or chemical ECM signals regulate invadopodia function. Here, we report that ECM rigidity directly increases both the number and activity of invadopodia. Transduction of ECM-rigidity signals depends on the cellular contractile apparatus [5-7], given that inhibition of nonmuscle myosin II, myosin light chain kinase, and Rho kinase all abrogate invadopodia-associated ECM degradation. Whereas myosin IIA, IIB, and phosphorylated myosin light chain do not localize to invadopodia puncta, active phosphorylated forms of the mechanosensing proteins p130Cas (Cas) and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) are present in actively degrading invadopodia, and the levels of phospho-Cas and phospho-FAK in invadopodia are sensitive to myosin inhibitors. Overexpression of Cas or FAK further enhances invadopodia activity in cells plated on rigid polyacrylamide substrates. Thus, in invasive cells, ECM-rigidity signals lead to increased matrix-degrading activity at invadopodia, via a myosin II-FAK/Cas pathway. These data suggest a potential mechanism, via invadopodia, for the reported correlation of tissue density with cancer aggressiveness.

[1]  S. Hanks,et al.  Regulation and localization of CAS substrate domain tyrosine phosphorylation. , 2004, Cellular signalling.

[2]  C. Figdor,et al.  Myosin II and mechanotransduction: a balancing act. , 2007, Trends in cell biology.

[3]  Alissa M. Weaver,et al.  CAS promotes invasiveness of Src-transformed cells , 2004, Oncogene.

[4]  J. Bishop,et al.  Visualization and quantification of breast cancer biomechanical properties with magnetic resonance elastography. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  W. Chilian,et al.  Role of Focal Adhesion Kinase in Flow-Induced Dilation of Coronary Arterioles , 2005, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[6]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  B. Sumpio,et al.  Tyrosine phosphorylation of pp125FAK and paxillin in aortic endothelial cells induced by mechanical strain. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[9]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[10]  Jinbo Chen,et al.  Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  Sábata S Constancio,et al.  Crk-Associated Substrate Tyrosine Phosphorylation Sites Are Critical for Invasion and Metastasis of Src-Transformed Cells , 2005, Molecular Cancer Research.

[12]  Patricia J Keely,et al.  Focal adhesion regulation of cell behavior. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[13]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Force Sensing by Mechanical Extension of the Src Family Kinase Substrate p130Cas , 2006, Cell.

[16]  Elliot L. Botvinick,et al.  Visualizing the mechanical activation of Src , 2005, Nature.

[17]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[18]  M. Aepfelbacher,et al.  Podosomes: adhesion hot-spots of invasive cells. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[19]  D. Schlaepfer,et al.  v-Src SH3-enhanced Interaction with Focal Adhesion Kinase at β1 Integrin-containing Invadopodia Promotes Cell Invasion* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  S. Hanks,et al.  Cellular responses to substrate topography: role of myosin II and focal adhesion kinase. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Radhika Desai,et al.  ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  S. Linder The matrix corroded: podosomes and invadopodia in extracellular matrix degradation. , 2007, Trends in cell biology.

[23]  Grégory Giannone,et al.  Substrate rigidity and force define form through tyrosine phosphatase and kinase pathways. , 2006, Trends in cell biology.

[24]  M. Gimona,et al.  Actin cytoskeleton remodelling via local inhibition of contractility at discrete microdomains , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[25]  Alissa M. Weaver Invadopodia: Specialized Cell Structures for Cancer Invasion , 2006, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[26]  R D Kamm,et al.  Force-induced unfolding of the focal adhesion targeting domain and the influence of paxillin binding. , 2004, Mechanics & chemistry of biosystems : MCB.