Benchmarking firms' operational performance according to their use of internet‐based interorganizational systems

Purpose – Drawing on the concepts of benchmarking and of fit as profile deviation, the purpose of this paper is to identify the critical dimensions of usage of internet based interorganizational systems (IOISs) of the best performing firms.Design/methodology/approach – Empirical evidence is gathered through an electronic survey conducted with 228 manufacturers in the computer and electronic product manufacturing sector.Findings – Data collected demonstrates that: volume of use and depth of use are the two critical dimensions of internet based IOISs usage on the supplier side; volume of use, level of integration, diversity of types and depth of use are the four critical dimensions of internet based IOISs usage on the customer side; and a deviation from these patterns of internet based IOISs usage should result in poorer operational performance. Statistical analyses also show the relative importance of each of the critical dimensions of internet based IOISs usage on both the supplier and customer sides of t...

[1]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[2]  Stephanie S. Barrett,et al.  Inter-Organization Information Sharing Systems , 1982, MIS Q..

[3]  Gregory H. Watson,et al.  Strategic Benchmarking: How to Rate Your Company's Performance against the World's Best , 1993 .

[4]  Tawfik Jelassi,et al.  SIM Paper Competition: Competing Through EDI at Brun Passot: Achievements in France and Ambitions for the Single European Market , 1994, MIS Q..

[5]  Sree Nilakanta,et al.  Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Christopher E. Bogan,et al.  Benchmarking for Best Practices: Winning Through Innovative Adaptation , 1994 .

[7]  D. Berry,et al.  Supply Chain Management in the Electronics Products Industry , 1994 .

[8]  A. Roth,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies , 1994 .

[9]  Tridas Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Interdependent Benefits from Interorganizational Systems: Opportunities for Business Partner Reengineering , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[11]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information Technology and Productivity: A Review of the Literature , 1996, Adv. Comput..

[12]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Measuring the Extent of EDI Usage in Complex Organizations: Strategies and Illustrative Examples , 1996, MIS Q..

[13]  Carl H. Marcussen,et al.  The Effects of EDI on Industrial Buyer‐Seller Relationships: A Network Perspective , 1996 .

[14]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[15]  Vivek Choudhury,et al.  Strategic Choices in the Development of Interorganizational Information Systems , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[17]  Louis A. Lefebvre,et al.  Global strategic benchmarking, critical capabilities and performance of aerospace subcontractors , 1998 .

[18]  R. Schmenner,et al.  On theory in operations management , 1998 .

[19]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Emerging Electronic Partnerships: Antecedents and Dimensions of EDI Use from the Supplier's Perspective , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Frederick J. Riggins,et al.  Toward a unified view of electronic commerce , 1998, CACM.

[21]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  Partnerships to Improve Supply Chains , 1999 .

[22]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Organizational and Interorganizational Determinants of EDI Diffusion and Organizational Performance: A Causal Model , 1999, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[23]  Fiona Stewart,et al.  Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online , 2000 .

[24]  Lydia B. Blalock,et al.  Extranets: impacts on business practices and relationships , 2000 .

[25]  Gregory E. Truman,et al.  Integration in Electronic Exchange Environments , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  M. Christopher,et al.  An Integrated Model for the Design of Agile Supply Chains. , 2001 .

[27]  Wallace E. Carroll,et al.  The Diffusion and Assimilation of Information Technology Innovations , 2001 .

[28]  Jussi T. S. Heikkilä,et al.  From supply to demand chain management: efficiency and customer satisfaction , 2002 .

[29]  Markham T. Frohlich,et al.  e-Integration in the Supply Chain: Barriers and Performance , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[30]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  e-Commerce Metrics for Net-Enhanced Organizations: Assessing the Value of e-Commerce to Firm Performance in the Manufacturing Sector , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  Managing electronic interchange of business documents , 2002, CACM.

[32]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Demand chain management in manufacturing and services: web-based integration, drivers and performance , 2002 .

[33]  B. Arntzen,et al.  DRIVEN BY DEMAND: A CASE STUDY. , 2002 .

[34]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Rajesh Sethi,et al.  Making sense of the e-supply chain landscape: an implementation framework , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[36]  Douglas M. Lambert,et al.  Internet-enabled coordination in the supply chain , 2003 .

[37]  I. Papadakis On the sensitivity of configure‐to‐order supply chains for personal computers after component market disruptions , 2003 .

[38]  Eve D. Rosenzweig,et al.  The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: An exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers , 2003 .

[39]  Gyoo Gun Lim,et al.  The impact of partnership attributes on EDI implementation success , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[40]  Sangjae Lee Business use of Internet-based information systems: the case of Korea , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[41]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships , 2003 .

[42]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Gaining from vertical partnerships : Knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries , 2003 .

[43]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Generic manufacturing strategies and plant performance , 2004 .

[44]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information Technology Payoff in E-Business Environments: An International Perspective on Value Creation of E-Business in the Financial Services Industry , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[46]  P. Hadaya Determinants of the future level of use of electronic marketplaces among Canadian firms , 2004 .

[47]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Assimilation and Diffusion of Web Technologies in Supply-Chain Management: An Examination of Key Drivers and Performance Impacts , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[48]  T. Simatupang,et al.  The collaboration index: a measure for supply chain collaboration , 2005 .

[49]  P. Cousins The alignment of appropriate firm and supply strategies for competitive advantage , 2005 .

[50]  Li-Ling Hsu,et al.  SCM system effects on performance for interaction between suppliers and buyers , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[51]  I. Chen,et al.  Strategic Supply Management and Dyadic Quality Performance: A Path Analytical Model , 2005 .

[52]  P. Andersen,et al.  Bridges over troubled water: suppliers as connective nodes in global supply networks , 2005 .

[53]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Data exchange in interorganizational relationships: review through multiple conceptual lenses , 2005, DATB.

[54]  A. Sánchez,et al.  Supply chain flexibility and firm performance , 2005 .

[55]  Varun Grover,et al.  Examining the Impact of Interorganizational Systems on Process Efficiency and Sourcing Leverage in Buyer-Supplier Dyads , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[56]  H. Boeck,et al.  Exploring B-to-B e-commerce adoption trajectories in manufacturing SMEs , 2005 .

[57]  Lori S. Cook,et al.  Manufacturing and Service Supply Chain Performance: A Comparative Analysis , 2006 .

[58]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Determinants of E-Business Use in U.S. Firms , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[59]  Giovani J.C. da Silveira,et al.  The relationship between interorganizational information systems and operations performance , 2006 .

[60]  Pierre Hadaya,et al.  Determinants of the future level of use of electronic marketplaces: The case of Canadian firms , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[61]  Jerry C. Wei,et al.  Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: The role of production information integration in the supply chain , 2007 .

[62]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[63]  Andreas I. Nicolaou Research issues on the use of ERPS in interorganizational relationships , 2008, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Gary D. Scudder,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of EDI Usage and Performance Improvement in Food Supply Chains , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[65]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Environment--strategy coalignment: an empirical test of its performance implications , 2011 .