An invariant approach replacing Abbe principle for motion accuracy test and motion error identification of linear axes

Abstract The motion accuracy of a linear axis is represented by the geometric errors defined in the current standards. However, the geometric errors are the local properties for the error-included motion of the moving component and their values are related to the position of the measured function point or line. This will cause uncertainties for the results of an accuracy test. Thus, a new invariant approach is presented for the motion accuracy test and motion error identification of a linear axis. The translational and angular error motions of the moving component are identified definitively according to the global kinematic properties of the error-included motion. The invariant errors, including the range of translational error motion, the range of tilting error motion and the range of rolling error motion, are defined to evaluate the motion accuracy. The relationships between the geometric errors of the trajectory traced by an arbitrary point or line and the motion errors of the moving component are established to replace the Abbe principle and the Bryan principle for accuracy test in a rigorous mathematical way. The motion of a linear axis in a machine tool is tested as the experiments to illustrate the advantages of the invariant approach. The results show that the invariant errors are independent of the measured function point or line. The geometric errors of the trajectory traced by an arbitrary point or line can be calculated, and the deviations caused by the translational and angular error motions are distinguished using the invariant approach.

[2]  Yoshikazu Arai,et al.  Measurement of multi-degree-of-freedom error motions of a precision linear air-bearing stage , 2006 .

[3]  Graham T. Smith,et al.  Machine Tool Metrology: An Industrial Handbook , 2016 .

[4]  J. B. Bryan,et al.  The Abbé principle revisited: An updated interpretation , 1979 .

[5]  Ming Deng,et al.  Geometric error analysis and compensation for multi-axis spiral bevel gears milling machine , 2018 .

[6]  Kuang-Chao Fan,et al.  Development of a Compact Three-Degree-of-Freedom Laser Measurement System with Self-Wavelength Correction for Displacement Feedback of a Nanopositioning Stage , 2018, Applied Sciences.

[7]  Yu Wu,et al.  A novel accuracy model for the intrinsic kinematic property of a prismatic pair , 2018 .

[8]  Wei Wang,et al.  Measurement method for volumetric error of five-axis machine tool considering measurement point distribution and adaptive identification process , 2019 .

[9]  Majda Paweł,et al.  Rapid method to determine accuracy and repeatability of positioning of numerically controlled axes , 2019 .

[10]  Li Zhuang,et al.  Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools , 2012 .

[11]  Wei Wang,et al.  Actual inverse kinematics for position-independent and position-dependent geometric error compensation of five-axis machine tools , 2016 .

[12]  Chaoqun Wang,et al.  Position geometric error modeling, identification and compensation for large 5-axis machining center prototype , 2015 .

[13]  Jenq-Shyong Chen,et al.  Geometric error calibration of multi-axis machines using an auto-alignment laser interferometer , 1999 .

[14]  Friedrich Bleicher,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Studies of the Influence of Geometric Deviations in the Performance of Machine Tools Linear Guides , 2016 .

[15]  Hongli Gao,et al.  Geometric error contribution modeling and sensitivity evaluating for each axis of five-axis machine tools based on POE theory and transforming differential changes between coordinate frames , 2019 .

[16]  Jun Ni,et al.  A displacement measurement approach for machine geometric error assessment , 2001 .

[17]  Sun-Kyu Lee,et al.  Design and construction of a single unit multi-function optical encoder for a six-degree-of-freedom motion error measurement in an ultraprecision linear stage , 2011 .

[18]  Wei Gao,et al.  A six-degree-of-freedom surface encoder for precision positioning of a planar motion stage , 2013 .

[19]  Kuang-Chao Fan,et al.  A novel modeling of volumetric errors of three-axis machine tools based on Abbe and Bryan principles , 2020 .

[21]  Wei Gao,et al.  A three-axis autocollimator for detection of angular error motions of a precision stage , 2011 .