User choices for nonparametric preprocessing in system identification

Abstract Most research on system identification is focused on the identification of parametric models, for example a transfer function or a state space model where the information is condensed in a few parameters. In the daily practice, nonparametric methods, like frequency response function measurements, are intensively used. Recently, it was indicated that nonparametric identification methods could be used to robustify the parametric identification framework. A nonparametric preprocessing step can also be used to reduce or even eliminate the required user interaction, making system identification accessible for a much wider user group. For that reason, there is an increasing interest in nonparametric identification. In order to choose, compare, and to benchmark these nonparametric methods, it is very important to select the proper criteria. In this paper we identify and discuss the important choices that should be considered. It will be shown that these strongly depend on the intended use of the nonparametric model..

[1]  Julius S. Bendat,et al.  Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis , 1980 .

[2]  Keith R. Godfrey,et al.  Correlation methods , 1980, Autom..

[3]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Data‐Driven Bandwidth Selection in Local Polynomial Fitting: Variable Bandwidth and Spatial Adaptation , 1995 .

[4]  T. McKelvey On the finite length DFT of input-output signals of multivariable linear systems , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[5]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Adaptive smoothing methods for frequency-function estimation , 2001, Autom..

[6]  Venkataramanan Balakrishnan,et al.  System identification: theory for the user (second edition): Lennart Ljung; Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1999, ISBN 0-13-656695-2 , 2002, Autom..

[7]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Continuous-Time Noise Modeling From Sampled Data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[8]  J. Schoukens,et al.  Continuous-Time Noise Modelling from Sampled Data , 2006, 2006 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[9]  Gerd Vandersteen,et al.  Nonparametric preprocessing in system identification: A powerful tool , 2009, 2009 European Control Conference (ECC).

[10]  J. Schoukens,et al.  Estimation of nonparametric noise and FRF models for multivariable systems—Part II: Extensions, applications , 2010 .

[11]  J. Schoukens,et al.  Estimation of nonparametric noise and FRF models for multivariable systems—Part I: Theory , 2010 .

[12]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  The Local Polynomial Method for nonparametric system identification: Improvements and experimentation , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[13]  Yves Rolain,et al.  User friendly Box-Jenkins identification using nonparametric noise models , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[14]  Bo Wahlberg,et al.  A least squares approach to direct frequency response estimation , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[15]  Biao Huang,et al.  System Identification , 2000, Control Theory for Physicists.

[16]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  System Identification: A Frequency Domain Approach , 2012 .