Intercepting Moving Objects During Self-Motion.

It is generally assumed that in catching a fly ball, an efficient strategy for dealing with the horizontal component of the ball's trajectory is for the observer to keep the angular position of the ball constant with respect to his head. That strategy is called the constant bearing angle or CBA strategy. Maintenance of angular constancy results in the simultaneous arrival of both observer and ball at the landing spot. The authors analyzed the approach behavior of 26 subjects in a ball-interception task with straight paths for both the subjects and the ball. Subjects moved at a velocity that maintained a close-to-constant horizontal angular position of the ball with respect to the end effector throughout the approach phase rather than a constant bearing angle with respect to their head. Velocity adaptations occurred as a function of the changes in the angular velocity of the ball in such a way that a positive or negative angular velocity was canceled. Thus, an actor following the CBA strategy does not need to know where and when the ball will arrive (i.e., a predictive strategy), because reliance on the CBA strategy ensures that he will make the appropriate adaptations that enable him to arrive at the right place in the right time.

[1]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual information about moving objects. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  M K Kaiser,et al.  How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. , 1995, Science.

[3]  P. McLeod,et al.  How to Catch a Cricket Ball , 1993, Perception.

[4]  M. Moseley,et al.  Does stereopsis matter in humans? , 1996, Eye.

[5]  William Schiff,et al.  Aging persons' estimates of vehicular motion. , 1992 .

[6]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[7]  J. Tresilian.  Perceptual Information for the Timing of Interceptive Action , 1990, Perception.

[8]  L. Rosenblum,et al.  Relative Effectiveness of Three Stimulus Variables for Locating a Moving Sound Source , 1987, Perception.

[9]  B S Lanchester,et al.  Pursuit and prediction in the tracking of moving food by a teleost fish (Acanthaluteres spilomelanurus). , 1975, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  J. Tresilian.  Study of a Servo-control Strategy for Projectile Interception , 1995 .

[11]  P. McLeod,et al.  Do Fielders Know Where to Go to Catch the Ball or Only How to Get There , 1996 .

[12]  James E. Cutting,et al.  How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving objects. , 1995 .

[13]  J. L. Dannemiller,et al.  On Catching Fly Balls , 1996, Science.

[14]  John P. Wann,et al.  Time-to-contact judgment in the locomotion of adults and preschool children. , 1993 .

[15]  P. J. Brancazio.  Looking into Chapman’s homer: The physics of judging a fly ball , 1985 .

[16]  M. Kaiser,et al.  Optical specification of time-to-passage: Observers' sensitivity to global tau. , 1993 .

[17]  M K Kaiser,et al.  Response: On Catching Fly Balls , 1996, Science.

[18]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  The optics and actions of catching fly balls , 1992 .

[19]  R J Bootsma,et al.  Visual information about time-to-collision between two objects. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  W H Janssen.  THE DETECTION OF IMPENDING COLLISION IN CURVED INTERSECTION APPROACHES , 1984 .

[21]  Daniel Mestre,et al.  Catching balls: How to get the hand to the right place at the right time. , 1994 .

[22]  Matthieu Lenoir,et al.  Effects of background texture on interceptive timing during locomotion , 1996 .

[23]  C Berthelon,et al.  Curvilinear Approach to an Intersection and Visual Detection of a Collision , 1993, Human factors.

[24]  W H Warren,et al.  Visual control of braking: a test of the tau hypothesis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Seville Chapman.  Catching a Baseball , 1968 .