The Influence of Physical Cohesion on Scour around a Monopile

We present experiments that systematically examine how the addition of physically cohesive clay to sand affects scour evolution around a monopile in a current. Repeated centreline transects are used to show the changes in scour depth and excavated material over time. Combined with 3D plots of the final equilibrium morphology, the results conclusively prove that clay content causes a progressive reduction in the equilibrium depth, excavated area and that timescales of scour increase with clay content. Winnowing of clay particles from the sand matrix is a pre-requisite for scour and differences in clay content influence the rate and extent of winnowing, ultimately controlling equilibrium scour morphology. The strong linear relationships between clay content and equilibrium scour parameters offers a simple index on which to modify existing scour prediction methods. It follows that improved predictions of scour development can reduce manufacturing costs and related logistical expenses of structure operations in fluvial, coastal or offshore environments.

[1]  Jean-Louis Briaud,et al.  SRICOS: Prediction of Scour Rate in Cohesive Soils at Bridge Piers , 1999 .

[2]  E. T. Smerdon,et al.  Relation of Compaction and Other Soil Properties to Erosion Resistance of Soils , 1965 .

[3]  John M. Harris,et al.  The nature of scour development and scour protection at offshore windfarm foundations. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[4]  D. O'Brien,et al.  Seabed scour assessment for offshore windfarm , 2006 .

[5]  I. S. Dunn Tractive Resistance of Cohesive Channels , 1959 .

[6]  Kandiah Arulanandan,et al.  Erosion Rates of Cohesive Soils , 1978 .

[7]  W. V. Kesteren,et al.  Erosion threshold of sand–mud mixtures , 2011 .

[8]  B. Melville PIER AND ABUTMENT SCOUR: INTEGRATED APPROACH , 1997 .

[9]  W. H. Dall A MONOGRAPH OF BRITISH FOSSIL BRACHIOPODA. , 1885, Science.

[10]  A. R. Nowell,et al.  Predicting erosion resistance of muds , 1992 .

[11]  Jean-Louis Briaud,et al.  Flume tests for scour in clay at circular piers , 2001 .

[12]  Johan C. Winterwerp,et al.  A conceptual framework for the erosion behaviour of sand-mud mixtures , 2004 .

[13]  Helen Mitchener,et al.  Erosion of mud/sand mixtures , 1996 .

[14]  U. C. Kothyari,et al.  Influence of cohesion on scour around bridge piers , 2002 .

[15]  R. Brabant,et al.  Monitoring of hydrodynamic and morphological changes at the C-Power and the Belwind offshore wind farm sites: A synthesis , 2010 .

[16]  Mufeed Odeh,et al.  Large scale clear-water local pier scour experiments , 2004 .

[17]  J. Peakall,et al.  Sticky stuff: Redefining bedform prediction in modern and ancient environments , 2015 .

[18]  Vallam Sundar,et al.  Current-induced scour around a vertical pile in cohesive soil , 2003 .

[19]  R. Whitehouse,et al.  Marine scour: lessons from nature’s laboratory , 2014 .

[20]  A. Davies,et al.  Bedform development in mixed sand-mud: The contrasting role of cohesive forces in flow and bed , 2013 .

[21]  Stanley R. Davis,et al.  Evaluating scour at bridges. , 1995 .

[22]  Marian Muste,et al.  Erosion of Cohesive Sediments: Resuspension, Bed Load, and Erosion Patterns from Field Experiments , 2007 .

[23]  John M. Harris,et al.  Scour Assessment in Complex Marine Soils -An Evaluation through Case Examples , 2010 .

[24]  Umesh C. Kothyari F.Ish,et al.  BRIDGE SCOUR: STATUS AND RESEARCH CHALLENGES , 2008 .

[25]  Michael Collins,et al.  The influence of clay on the threshold of movement of fine sandy beds , 1997 .

[26]  A. Melih Yanmaz,et al.  STUDY OF TIME-DEPENDENT LOCAL SCOUR AROUND BRIDGE PIERS , 1991 .

[27]  R. P. Beasley,et al.  The tractive force theory applied to stability of open channels in cohesive soils , 1959 .

[28]  K. Dyer,et al.  Muddy Coasts of the World: Processes, Deposits and Function , 2003 .