Attitudes, preferences, and intentions of German households concerning participation in peer-to-peer electricity trading

Based on a survey among customers of seven German municipal utilities, we estimate hierarchical multiple regression models to identify consumer motivations for participating in P2P electricity trading and develop implications for marketing strategies for this currently relatively unknown product. Our results show a low importance of socio-demographics in explaining differences between consumer groups, but high influence of attitudes, knowledge and likelihood to purchase related products. The most valuable target groups for P2P electricity trading marketing strategies of municipal utilities first and foremost should aim at are innovators, especially prosumers. They are well-informed about and open-minded concerning electricity sharing and highly environmentally aware. They ask for transparency and are willing to purchase related products. They are attracted by the ability to share generation and consumption and to a lesser extent by economic reasons. Our results indicate that the marketing efforts should to a special degree take peer effects into account, as they are found to wield great influence on general openness towards and purchase intention for P2P electricity products. Finally, municipal utilities should build on the high level of satisfaction and trust of consumers and use P2P electricity trading as measure to keep and win customers willing to change their supplier.

[1]  T. Kaphengst,et al.  Energy transition and behavioural change in rural areas - The role of energy cooperatives , 2014 .

[2]  K. Matschoss,et al.  The rejection of innovations? Rethinking technology diffusion and the non-use of smart energy services in Finland , 2017 .

[3]  A. Kowalska-Pyzalska What makes consumers adopt to innovative energy services in the energy market? A review of incentives and barriers , 2016 .

[4]  T. J. Gerpott,et al.  Determinants of green electricity adoption among residential customers in Germany , 2010 .

[5]  Patrick Hartmann,et al.  Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern , 2012 .

[6]  Aidan O'Driscoll,et al.  The diffusion of microgeneration technologies – assessing the influence of perceived product characteristics on home owners' willingness to pay , 2011 .

[7]  Klaus Menrad,et al.  Is it really all about the return on investment? Exploring private wind energy investors' preferences , 2016 .

[8]  M. Soskin,et al.  Homeowner willingness to pay for rooftop solar electricity generation , 2017 .

[9]  B. Girod,et al.  Economic versus belief-based models: Shedding light on the adoption of novel green technologies , 2017 .

[10]  Ingo Kastner,et al.  Investments in renewable energies by German households: A matter of economics, social influences and ecological concern? , 2016 .

[11]  Michael Menhart,et al.  Drivers of the lifecycle: the example of the German insurance industry , 2006 .

[12]  Towhidul Islam,et al.  Household level innovation diffusion model of photo-voltaic (PV) solar cells from stated preference data , 2014 .

[13]  Thomas Bauwens Explaining the Diversity of Motivations Behind Community Renewable Energy , 2016 .

[14]  Ijeoma Onyeji,et al.  Consumer engagement: An insight from smart grid projects in Europe , 2013 .

[15]  Gavin Turrell,et al.  Income non-reporting: implications for health inequalities research , 2000, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[16]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Pioneering customers as change agents for new energy efficiency services—an empirical study in the Finnish electricity markets , 2015 .

[17]  E. Sardianou,et al.  Which factors affect the willingness of consumers to adopt renewable energies , 2013 .

[18]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Green marketing consumer-level theory review: A compendium of applied theories and further research directions , 2018 .

[19]  Neveen Hamza,et al.  Renewable energy adoption in an ageing population: Heterogeneity in preferences for micro-generation technology adoption , 2011 .

[20]  N. Meade,et al.  The impact of attribute preferences on adoption timing: The case of photo-voltaic (PV) solar cells for household electricity generation , 2013 .

[21]  Iain MacGill,et al.  Typology of future clean energy communities: An exploratory structure, opportunities, and challenges , 2017 .

[22]  Christoph Lutz,et al.  What's mine is yours (for a nominal fee) - Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Sirkka Heinonen,et al.  Culture, values, lifestyles, and power in energy futures: A critical peer-to-peer vision for renewable energy , 2017 .

[24]  E. Williams,et al.  Analyzing consumer acceptance of photovoltaics (PV) using fuzzy logic model , 2012 .

[25]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Prosumer Preferences Regarding the Adoption of Micro-Generation Technologies: Empirical Evidence for German Homeowners , 2015 .

[26]  Sebastian Gölz,et al.  What motivates people to use energy feedback systems? A multiple goal approach to predict long-term usage behaviour in daily life , 2016 .

[27]  R. Peterson A Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha , 1994 .

[28]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[29]  J. Schor,et al.  Collaborating and connecting: the emergence of the sharing economy , 2015 .

[30]  Elizabeth Chang,et al.  Prosumer Communities and Relationships in Smart Grids: A Literature Review, Evolution and Future Directions , 2018, Energies.

[31]  P. Pinson,et al.  Energy Collectives: A Community and Fairness Based Approach to Future Electricity Markets , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[32]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis: Text and Readings , 1979 .

[33]  T. J. Gerpott,et al.  Determinants of price mark‐up tolerance for green electricity – lessons for environmental marketing strategies from a study of residential electricity customers in Germany , 2009 .

[34]  Lars Holstenkamp,et al.  What are community energy companies trying to accomplish? An empirical investigation of investment motives in the German case , 2016 .

[35]  Juho Hamari,et al.  The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  J. B. Hunt,et al.  The Effect of Introducing a New Brand on Consumer Perceptions of Current Brand Similarity: The Roles of Product Knowledge and Involvement , 2002 .

[37]  Carsten Herbes,et al.  Online marketing of green electricity in Germany—A content analysis of providers’ websites , 2014 .

[38]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  Willingness to pay for green electricity: A review of the contingent valuation literature and its sources of error , 2016 .

[39]  Carel Dieperink,et al.  Local civil society based renewable energy organisations in the Netherlands: Exploring the factors that stimulate their emergence and development , 2014 .

[40]  J. Soon,et al.  Willingly or grudgingly? A meta-analysis on the willingness-to-pay for renewable energy use , 2015 .

[41]  Tharam S. Dillon,et al.  Goal-Oriented Prosumer Community Groups for the Smart Grid , 2014, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[42]  Nicola McEwen,et al.  Mobilizing Community Energy , 2012 .

[43]  Carsten Rennhak,et al.  Bank der Zukunft oder Zukunft der Bank? Herausforderungen, Trends & Handlungsempfehlungen für die Retail-Bank der Zukunft , 2014 .

[44]  L. Buys,et al.  Residential consumers’ experiences in the adoption and use of solar PV , 2017 .

[45]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  The British public’s perception of the UK smart metering initiative: Threats and opportunities , 2016 .

[46]  Adrian Smith,et al.  A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK , 2013 .

[47]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Chelsea Schelly Residential solar electricity adoption: What motivates, and what matters? A case study of early adopters , 2014 .

[49]  Stefan Hoffmann,et al.  When do materialistic consumers join commercial sharing systems , 2016 .

[50]  Julian Sagebiel,et al.  Quality uncertainty and the market for renewable energy: Evidence from German consumers , 2016 .

[51]  Paulien M. Herder,et al.  Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems , 2016 .

[52]  Ulf J. J. Hahnel,et al.  Intentions to adopt photovoltaic systems depend on homeowners' expected personal gains and behavior of peers , 2015 .

[53]  Carsten H. Rennhak,et al.  Emotional Branding in der Automobilindustrie: ein Schlüssel zu langfristigem Markenerfolg? , 2011 .

[54]  Erfolgsfaktoren für Fachbücher: Eine explorative Untersuchung verkaufsbeeinflussender Faktoren am Beispiel von Marketing-Fachbüchern , 2006 .

[55]  Allison M. Borchers,et al.  Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? A contingent choice experiment , 2007 .

[56]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[57]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Motivations and barriers associated with adopting microgeneration energy technologies in the UK , 2013 .

[58]  B. Balck,et al.  Empirical analysis of customer motives in the shareconomy: a cross-sectoral comparison , 2015 .

[59]  Daniel Vecchiato,et al.  Public preferences for electricity contracts including renewable energy: A marketing analysis with choice experiments , 2015 .

[60]  Anna Bergek,et al.  Motives to adopt renewable electricity technologies: Evidence from Sweden , 2017 .

[61]  Poul Erik Morthorst,et al.  Renewable energy policies in Europe: Converging or diverging? , 2012 .

[62]  Katrin Rehdanz,et al.  Consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity: A meta-analysis of the literature , 2015 .

[63]  J. Hicks,et al.  An exploration of the boundaries of ‘community’ in community renewable energy projects: Navigating between motivations and context , 2018 .

[64]  Hans Stubbe Solgaard,et al.  Value seeking, price sensitive, or green? Analyzing preference heterogeneity among residential energy consumers in Denmark , 2015 .

[65]  Vilja Varho,et al.  Early adopters boosting the diffusion of sustainable small-scale energy solutions , 2015 .

[66]  Chankook Park,et al.  Comparative review and discussion on P2P electricity trading , 2017 .

[67]  Veselina Milanova,et al.  Sharing intangibles: Uncovering individual motives for engagement in a sharing service setting* , 2017 .

[68]  Kimberly S. Wolske,et al.  Explaining interest in adopting residential solar photovoltaic systems in the United States: Toward an integration of behavioral theories , 2017 .

[69]  Pierre Pinson,et al.  Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[70]  Y. Parag,et al.  Motivations and barriers to integrating ‘prosuming’ services into the future decentralized electricity grid: Findings from Israel , 2016 .

[71]  A. Hidalgo,et al.  Motivators for adoption of photovoltaic systems at grid parity: A case study from Southern Germany , 2015 .

[72]  Easan Drury,et al.  Diffusion into new markets: evolving customer segments in the solar photovoltaics market , 2015 .

[73]  E. Vasileiadou,et al.  "Let's do it ourselves" : individual motivations for investing in renewables at community level , 2015 .

[74]  Volker Reichenberger,et al.  Survey concerning enablers for material efficiency activities in manufacturing, their supply chains and the transformation towards circular economy , 2018 .

[75]  Maksym Polyakov,et al.  Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy: A Meta-Regression Analysis , 2015 .

[76]  Janet Stephenson,et al.  Prosumer collectives: a review , 2016 .

[77]  Stephanie,et al.  The Crowd Energy Concept , 2014 .

[78]  R. Margolis,et al.  Overcoming barriers and uncertainties in the adoption of residential solar PV , 2016 .

[79]  Lars Strupeit,et al.  Overcoming barriers to renewable energy diffusion: business models for customer-sited solar photovoltaics in Japan, Germany and the United States , 2016 .

[80]  Susan Egerter,et al.  Potential Implications of Missing Income Data in Population-Based Surveys: An Example from a Postpartum Survey in California , 2007, Public health reports.

[81]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany , 2013 .

[82]  Julian Sagebiel,et al.  Are consumers willing to pay more for electricity from cooperatives? Results from an online Choice Experiment in Germany , 2014 .

[83]  C. Hoffmann,et al.  Participation in the Sharing Economy , 2017 .

[84]  Jutta Roosen,et al.  Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: The role of community and trust in Germany , 2016 .

[85]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Investigating the importance of motivations and barriers related to microgeneration uptake in the UK , 2014 .

[86]  Sabine Löbbe,et al.  The Transformation of the German Electricity Sector and the Emergence of New Business Models in Distributed Energy Systems , 2017 .

[87]  O. Wagner,et al.  Remunicipalisation and foundation of municipal utilities in the German energy sector : details about newly established enterprises , 2017 .

[89]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  What makes people seal the green power deal? — Customer segmentation based on choice experiment in Germany , 2014 .

[90]  Reutlinger Diskussionsbeiträge zu Attitudes , preferences , and intentions of German households concerning participation in peer-to-peer electricity trading December 2018 , 2018 .

[91]  Alvar Palm,et al.  Peer effects in residential solar photovoltaics adoption—A mixed methods study of Swedish users , 2017 .

[92]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Electricity market design for the prosumer era , 2016, Nature Energy.

[93]  L. Böcker,et al.  Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) Working Paper Series , 2016 .

[94]  Jianzhong Wu,et al.  Review of Existing Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Projects , 2017 .

[95]  M. D. Nooij,et al.  Own power: Motives of having electricity without the energy company ☆ , 2011 .

[96]  Véronique Vasseur,et al.  The adoption of PV in the Netherlands: A statistical analysis of adoption factors , 2015 .

[97]  Stamatis Karnouskos,et al.  A survey towards understanding residential prosumers in smart grid neighbourhoods , 2012, 2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe).

[98]  G. Simpson,et al.  Testing Diffusion of Innovations Theory with data: Financial incentives, early adopters, and distributed solar energy in Australia , 2017 .

[99]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Helping "light green" consumers walk the talk: Results of a behavioural intervention survey in the Swiss electricity market , 2011 .

[100]  Product Placement am Beispiel des Kinofilms Sex and the City: The Movie , 2011 .

[101]  Chunbo Ma,et al.  Warm glow from green power: Evidence from Australian electricity consumers , 2016 .

[102]  Linda Steg,et al.  The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems: Comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity-personal norm model , 2016 .