On computing conditional fault-tolerance measures for k-covered wireless sensor networks

Traditional connectivity is a graph-theoretic concept that has been widely used as a measure of the fault tolerance in wireless sensor networks. The classical connectivity, however, assumes that any subset of nodes can potentially fail at the same time, including the entire neighbor set of any node. In this paper, we propose a new measure of fault tolerance, called conditional fault-tolerance, for a class of wireless sensor networks, named k-covered wireless sensor networks (kcwsn), using the concept of forbidden faulty set. Our forbidden faulty set analysis of conditional fault-tolerance prohibits having a simultaneous failure of all the neighbors of any node. We characterize kcwsn with either homogeneous or non-homogeneous sensors based on the assumptions of random uniform distribution of the sensors and circular model of their transmission and sensing ranges. In particular, we compute the minimum node degree of kcwsn. We also prove that in general, the relationship between transmission and sensing ranges (R≥2r) does not always imply network connectivity even if sensing coverage is guaranteed. Moreover, we propose two conditional fault-tolerance measures for kcwsn: one based on the concept of conditional connectivity, the other using a new concept that is called conditional coverage. Our results prove that kcwsn can sustain a large number of sensor failures provided that the faulty set does not include the forbidden faulty set.

[1]  Jianer Chen,et al.  Hypercube network fault tolerance: a probabilistic approach , 2002, Proceedings International Conference on Parallel Processing.

[2]  Ortrud R. Oellermann Conditional graph connectivity relative to hereditary properties , 1991, Networks.

[3]  Di Tian,et al.  Connectivity maintenance and coverage preservation in wireless sensor networks , 2004 .

[4]  R. Srikant,et al.  Unreliable sensor grids: coverage, connectivity and diameter , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[5]  Abdol-Hossein Esfahanian,et al.  Generalized Measures of Fault Tolerance with Application to N-Cube Networks , 1989, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[6]  Frank Harary,et al.  Conditional connectivity , 1983, Networks.

[7]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  Coverage and Connectivity Issues in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005 .

[8]  Jennifer C. Hou,et al.  Maintaining Sensing Coverage and Connectivity in Large Sensor Networks , 2005, Ad Hoc Sens. Wirel. Networks.

[9]  Suresh Singh,et al.  Exploiting heterogeneity in sensor networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[10]  Guoliang Xing,et al.  Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration for energy conservation in sensor networks , 2005, TOSN.

[11]  Jie Wu,et al.  Fault Tolerance Measures for m-Ary n-Dimensional Hypercubes Based on Forbidden Faulty Sets , 1998, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[12]  Miodrag Potkonjak,et al.  Worst and best-case coverage in sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[13]  Jennifer C. Hou,et al.  FLSS: a fault-tolerant topology control algorithm for wireless networks , 2004, MobiCom '04.

[14]  Shahram Latifi,et al.  Conditional Connectivity Measures for Large Multiprocessor Systems , 1994, IEEE Trans. Computers.