A Bibliometric Analysis of Communication Journals from 2002 to 2005

Journal impact ratings are often used by authors, promotion/hiring committees, and grant review teams as a proxy for scholarship quality. Journal citation data (2002–2005) from Social Sciences Citation Index were used to rank journals in the field of communication. A journal relatedness algorithm was applied to ascertain the 19 semantically related journals in communication. The mean journal impact index was 0.77 (SD= 0.28). Human Communication Research (HCR), Personal Relationships, Journal of Communication (JOC), and Communication Research (CR) were ranked the top four journals for the study years examined. Network analysis was conducted on in-degree (i.e., citations to journals) and out-degree (i.e., citations from journals) data for the 19 communication journals for 2003–2005. The purpose of the network analysis was to study the citation patterns among journals in the field of communication. Data using degree centrality indicate that Communication Monographs, CR, HCR, and JOC (in alphabetical order) are the four most central journals in the field. Resume Une analyse bibliometrique des revues de communication de 2002 a 2005 Le classement de l‘impact des revues est souvent utilise par les auteurs, les comites de promotion et d’embauche et les comites de selection des subventions comme indicateur de la qualite de la recherche. Des donnees liees a la citation des revues (Journal Citation data, 2002-2005) du Social Sciences Citation Index furent utilisees pour classer les revues du champ de la communication. Un algorithme de proximite des revues fut applique de maniere a determiner les 19 revues de communication liees sur le plan de la semantique. L‘index moyen de l’impact des revues etait de 0,77 (ecart-type = 0,28). Human Communication Research, Personal Relationships, Journal of Communication et Communication Research furent designes comme etant les quatre revues en tete de liste pour les annees etudiees. Une analyse de reseau fut conduite sur des donnees intra-degre (citations vers des revues) et extra-degre (citations provenant de revues) pour les 19 revues de communication en 2003-2005. L‘objectif de l’analyse de reseau etait d'etudier les schemas de citations entre les revues de communication. Les donnees utilisant la centralite des degres (degree centrality) indiquent que Communication Monographs, Communication Research, Human Communication Research et Journal of Communication (en ordre alphabetique) sont les 4 revues les plus centraux du domaine. Abstract Eine bibliometrische Analyse der kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Fachzeitschriften von 2002-2005 Das Ranking des Einflussfaktor von Fachzeitschriften (Impact Factor Rating) wird von Autoren, Beforderungs- oder Einstellungskommittees sowie Reviewern fur Zuschusse oft als Qualitatsmasstab fur Wissenschaft herangezogen. Zeitschriftenzitationsdaten (2002-2005) des Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) wurden benutzt, um eine Rangliste kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften zu erstellen. Ein Beziehungsalgorithmus der Zeitschriften wurde angewandt, um die 19 semantisch verwandten Zeitschriften zu ermitteln. Bezogen auf Untersuchungsjahre wurden Human Communication Research, Personal Relationships, Journal of Communication und Communication Research als die Top 4 -Zeitschriften gelistet. Fur die 19 Zeitschriften (2003-2005) wurden Netzwerkanalysen zum Zitationsgrad von intern (Verweise auf Zeitschriften) und auserhalb (Verweise von Zeitschriften) durchgefuhrt. Ziel dieser Netzwerkanalyse war es, Zitationsmuster innerhalb dieser kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Fachzeitschriften zu erfassen. Auf Basis dieser Daten zeigte sich, dass Communication Monographs, Communication Research, Human Communication Research und Journal of Communication (in alphabethischer Reihenfolge) die vier zentralsten Zeitschriften des Fachs sind. Resumen Un Analisis Bibliometrico de los Journals de Comunicacion desde el 2002 al 2005 El impacto de las clasificaciones de los Journals es usualmente usada por los autores, los comites de promocion/contratacion, y los equipos de revision de subvenciones como un reflejo de la calidad de la erudicion. Datos de Journals (2002 – 2005) del indice de citaciones en Ciencias Sociales fueron usados para categorizar a los journals del campo de la comunicacion. Un algoritmo relacionado del journal fue aplicado para averiguar las 19 relaciones semanticas de los journals en comunicacion. El indice promedio de impacto del journal fue de 0.77 (SD= 0.28). Human Communication Research, Personal Relationships, Journal of Communication, and Communication Research fueron clasificados como los 4 journals superiores para los anos examinados. Un analisis de red fue conducido sobre los datos dentro del titulo (a saber, citaciones en los journals) y fuera del titulo (a saber, citaciones de los journals) para los 19 journals de comunicacion entre 2003-2005. El proposito del analisis de red fue estudiar las pautas de citacion de los journals del campo de la comunicacion. Los datos, usando la centralidad del titulo, indican que el Communication Monographs, el Communication Research, el Human Communication Research, y el Journal of Communication (en orden alfabetico) son los 4 journals mas centrales del campo. ZhaiYao Yo yak

[1]  David Krackhardt,et al.  When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers' attitudes. , 1985 .

[2]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  Testing a communication network model of employee turnover based on centrality , 2000 .

[3]  P. Lawrence The politics of publication , 2003, Nature.

[4]  George A. Barnett,et al.  The Structure of Communication: A Network Analysis of the International Communication Association. , 1992 .

[5]  A. Rafferty,et al.  Bibliometrics and a culture of measurement. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[6]  J. Gowrishankar,et al.  Sprucing up one's impact factor , 1999, Nature.

[7]  C. Borgman,et al.  Citation Networks of Communication Journals, 1977–1985 Cliques and Positions, Citations Made and Citations Received , 1988 .

[8]  Jean Bodon,et al.  Research productivity in communication: An analysis, 1996‐2001 , 2003 .

[9]  Randall P. Settoon,et al.  A Relational Perspective on Turnover: Examining Structural, Attitudinal, and Behavioral Predictors , 2005 .

[10]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[11]  D. Christakis,et al.  Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? , 2003, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[12]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  The Beginnings of Communication Study in America: A Personal Memoir , 1997 .

[13]  Charles R. Berger,et al.  On Bridging the Communication Gap , 1988 .

[14]  E. Garfield Journal impact factor: a brief review. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[15]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.

[16]  Marya L. Doerfel,et al.  A Semantic Network Analysis of the International Communication Association , 1999 .

[17]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[18]  Sieck,et al.  The "impact factor": what it means to the impact of applied physiology , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[19]  C. So SYMPOSIUM ON MASS AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1988 .

[20]  Ernest A. Hakanen Lists as Social Grid: Ratings and Rankings in Everyday Life , 2002 .

[21]  Clement Y. K. So Citation Patterns of Core Communication Journals: An Assessment of the Developmental Status of Communication. , 1988 .

[22]  C. Borgman,et al.  A Bibliometric Evaluation of Core Journals in Communication Research. , 1983 .

[23]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Journal impact factors and self-citations: implications for psychology journals. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[24]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[25]  E. Funkhouser The Evaluative Use of Citation Analysis for Communication Journals , 1996 .

[26]  Donald S. Siegel,et al.  A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Journal Rankings: The Case of Formal Lists , 2000 .

[27]  Thomas D. Stewart Principles of Research in Communication , 2001 .

[28]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication as an Academic Discipline: A Dialogue. , 1983 .

[29]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Integrating Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews , 1989 .

[30]  Andrew P Kurmis,et al.  Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  THINGS I HAVE LEARNED (SO FAR) , 1990 .

[32]  D. Stacks,et al.  The status of research productivity in communication: 1915–1995 , 1999 .

[33]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  E. Garfield The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[35]  David Adam,et al.  Citation analysis: The counting house , 2002, Nature.

[36]  S. Brody,et al.  Impact factor as the best operational measure of medical journals , 1995, The Lancet.

[37]  Theodor W. Adorno,et al.  Dialectic of Enlightenment , 2020 .

[38]  Ulla K. Bunz,et al.  Publish or Perish: A Limited Author Analysis of ICA and NCA Journals , 2005 .