Design considerations for indirectly driven double shell capsules

Double shell capsules are predicted to ignite and burn at relatively low temperature (∼3 keV) via volume ignition and are a potential low-convergence path to substantial α-heating and possibly ignition at the National Ignition Facility. Double shells consist of a dense, high-Z pusher, which first shock heats and then performs work due to changes in pressure and volume (PdV work) on deuterium-tritium gas, bringing the entire fuel volume to high pressure thermonuclear conditions near implosion stagnation. The high-Z pusher is accelerated via a shock and subsequent compression of an intervening foam cushion by an ablatively driven low-Z outer shell. A broad capsule design parameter space exists due to the inherent flexibility of potential materials for the outer and inner shells and foam cushion. This is narrowed down by design physics choices and the ability to fabricate and assemble the separate pieces forming a double shell capsule. We describe the key physics for good double shell performance, the trade-offs in various design choices, and the challenges for capsule fabrication. Both 1D and 2D calculations from radiation-hydrodynamic simulations are presented.Double shell capsules are predicted to ignite and burn at relatively low temperature (∼3 keV) via volume ignition and are a potential low-convergence path to substantial α-heating and possibly ignition at the National Ignition Facility. Double shells consist of a dense, high-Z pusher, which first shock heats and then performs work due to changes in pressure and volume (PdV work) on deuterium-tritium gas, bringing the entire fuel volume to high pressure thermonuclear conditions near implosion stagnation. The high-Z pusher is accelerated via a shock and subsequent compression of an intervening foam cushion by an ablatively driven low-Z outer shell. A broad capsule design parameter space exists due to the inherent flexibility of potential materials for the outer and inner shells and foam cushion. This is narrowed down by design physics choices and the ability to fabricate and assemble the separate pieces forming a double shell capsule. We describe the key physics for good double shell performance, the trade-...

[1]  Y. Saillard.  Acceleration and deceleration model of indirect drive ICF capsules , 2006 .

[2]  M. Rosen,et al.  A consistent approach to solving the radiation diffusion equation , 2003 .

[3]  O. Landen,et al.  The physics basis for ignition using indirect-drive targets on the National Ignition Facility , 2004 .

[4]  Steven W. Haan,et al.  Three-dimensional HYDRA simulations of National Ignition Facility targets , 2001 .

[5]  J. Lindl.  Development of the indirect‐drive approach to inertial confinement fusion and the target physics basis for ignition and gain , 1995 .

[6]  R. Olson,et al.  Alternative hot spot formation techniques using liquid deuterium-tritium layer inertial confinement fusion capsules , 2013 .

[7]  Edward I. Moses,et al.  Ignition on the National Ignition Facility , 2007 .

[8]  S. Skupsky,et al.  Deceleration phase of inertial confinement fusion implosions , 2002 .

[9]  Watt,et al.  Progress toward ignition with noncryogenic double-shell capsules , 2000, Physical review letters.

[10]  Peter A. Amendt,et al.  Indirect-Drive Noncryogenic Double-Shell Ignition Targets for the National Ignition Facility: Design and Analysis , 2001 .

[11]  Jay D. Salmonson,et al.  High-mode Rayleigh-Taylor growth in NIF ignition capsules , 2007 .

[12]  J. Moody,et al.  Shock timing measurements and analysis in deuterium-tritium-ice layered capsule implosions on NIF , 2014 .

[13]  D. A. Callahan,et al.  Fuel gain exceeding unity in an inertially confined fusion implosion , 2014, Nature.

[14]  Ronald C. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The physics of DT ignition in small fusion targets , 1981 .

[15]  R. J. Mason,et al.  Thermonuclear burn characteristics of compressed deuterium‐tritium microspheres , 1974 .

[16]  Peter A. Amendt,et al.  Multimode short-wavelength perturbation growth studies for the National Ignition Facility double-shell ignition target designs , 2004 .

[17]  F. Evans,et al.  Alpha particle energy absorption in a reacting DT sphere , 1975 .

[18]  R. Margevicius,et al.  Toward the fabrication of a NIF target via hemisphere joining , 1999 .

[19]  E. Michael Campbell,et al.  The National Ignition Facility - applications for inertial fusion energy and high-energy-density science , 1999 .

[20]  G. Zimmerman,et al.  A new quotidian equation of state (QEOS) for hot dense matter , 1988 .

[21]  Jay D. Salmonson,et al.  Three-dimensional simulations of low foot and high foot implosion experiments on the National Ignition Facility , 2016 .

[22]  P. R. Woodruff,et al.  HELIOS-CR – A 1-D radiation-magnetohydrodynamics code with inline atomic kinetics modeling , 2006 .

[23]  Riccardo Tommasini,et al.  Application of fall-line mix models to understand degraded yield , 2008 .

[24]  Jay D. Salmonson,et al.  Plastic ablator ignition capsule design for the National Ignition Facility , 2010 .

[25]  Mark J. Schmitt,et al.  Low Fuel Convergence Path to Direct-Drive Fusion Ignition. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[26]  O. N. Krokhin,et al.  ESCAPE OF α PARTICLES FROM A LASER-PULSE-INITIATED THERMONUCLEAR REACTION , 1973 .

[27]  L. J. Atherton,et al.  Point design targets, specifications, and requirements for the 2010 ignition campaign on the National Ignition Facility , 2010 .