Nectar secretion pattern, removal effects, and breeding system of Ligaria cuneifolia (Loranthaceae)

Some aspects of the reproductive biology of Ligaria cuneifolia have been studied, addressing the following questions: (i) Are there temporal differences in the female and male functions? (ii) How do nectar composition, volume, concentration, and amount of sugar vary throughout the flower lifetime? (iii) How does the plant respond to nectar removal? (iv) What is the breeding system of this species? Flowers last 4 days. There is a predominance of the male function in the first days and of the female function in the last days. Chemical composition of nectar varies throughout the flower lifetime; there is a constant decrease in sucrose along with an increase in glucose. Nectar is secreted during nights, and every secretion period is followed by a cessation interval. After the final cessation, a period of active resorption follows. During the mostly male phase of the flower, nectar has more sucrose than hexose, its secretion is discontinuous, and nectar removal reduces the rate of nectar production. During the...

[1]  Marcelo A. Aizen,et al.  Forest Fragmentation, Pollination, and Plant Reproduction in a Chaco Dry Forest, Argentina , 1994 .

[2]  L. Galetto,et al.  Reproductive biology, variability of nectar features and pollination of Combretum fruticosum (Combretaceae) in Argentina , 1994 .

[3]  N. Waser,et al.  Geitonogamy: The neglected side of selfing. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  L. Galetto,et al.  Nectar Secretion Pattern and Removal Effects in Six Argentinean Pitcairnioideae (Bromeliaceae) , 1992 .

[5]  N. Reid Coevolution of mistletoes and frugivorous birds , 1991 .

[6]  G. Pyke What does it cost a plant to produce floral nectar? , 1991, Nature.

[7]  A. Búrquez,et al.  Do flowers reabsorb nectar , 1991 .

[8]  L. Galetto,et al.  The nectary, nectar and floral visitors of Ligaria cuneifolia. , 1990 .

[9]  J. L. Doust,et al.  Nectar production, flowering phenology, and strategies for pollination. , 1988 .

[10]  C. Galen,et al.  Testing the accuracy of using peroxidase activity to indicate stigma receptivity , 1987 .

[11]  C. E. Freeman Nectar-sugar composition in an individual of Ruellia peninsularis (Acanthaceae) , 1986 .

[12]  J. Feehan Explosive flower opening in ornithophily: a study of pollination mechanisms in some Central African Loranthaceae , 1985 .

[13]  P. Bernhardt Mistletoes on mistletoes: the floral ecology of Amyema miraculosum and its host, Amyema miquelii (Loranthaceae) , 1984 .

[14]  P. Bernhardt,et al.  THE STIGMATIC PAPILLAE OF AMYEMA (LORANTHACEAE): DEVELOPMENTAL RESPONSES TO PROTANDRY AND SURFACE ADAPTATIONS FOR BIRD POLLINATION , 1983 .

[15]  P. Davidar Similarity Between Flowers and Fruits in Some Flowerpecker Pollinated Mistletoes , 1983 .

[16]  J. Kuijt Status of the genera Aetanthus and Psathyranthus (Loranthaceae) , 1983 .

[17]  P. Bernhardt,et al.  The Floral Ecology of Sympatric Populations of Amyema pendulum and Amyema quandang (Loranthaceae) , 1981 .

[18]  F. G. Stiles,et al.  GEOGRAPHICAL ASPECTS OF BIRD-FLOWER COEVOLUTION, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO CENTRAL AMERICA' , 1981 .

[19]  P. Bernhardt,et al.  Floral Biology and Self-Incompatibility in Some Australian Mistletoes of the Genus Amyema (Loranthaceae) , 1980 .

[20]  F. Contino Observaciones sobre la conducta de Sappho sparganura en el cerro de Santa Bárbara, Jujuy, Argentina , 1975 .

[21]  J. E. Freund,et al.  Modern elementary statistics , 1953 .