Experiences with semantic net based hypermedia

Abstract The Many Using and Creating Hypermedia (MUCH) systems is based on the Dexter model and treats the storage layer as a semantic net. The MUCH system provides a number of recommended link types for representing application domain concepts, such as thesauri, documents, and annotations. Users of the system are expected to use those link types in the course of authoring meaningful hypermedia. This paper is based on the logs of usage of the MUCH system over 2 years by over 200 people. Contrary to the expectations of the builders of the MUCH system, the users did not exploit the ability to type semantic links. Typically authors used the default link type regardless of their semantic intentions. When a link type other than the default type was chosen, that choice was often inconsistent with the way another user would label a similar link. The system has proven to be useful for authoring conventional documents. Authors, however, were not practically able to produce hypertext documents. Based on these experiences a new system, RICH (Reusable Intelligent Collaborative Hypermedia), has been designed and built which emphasizes rules for typing links and maintaining the integrity of the semantic net.

[1]  Michael L. Begeman,et al.  gIBIS: A tool for all reasons , 1989, JASIS.

[2]  Peter J. Brown,et al.  Turning ideas into products: the Guide system , 1987, Hypertext.

[3]  Mark Weiser,et al.  TEXTNET: a network-based approach to text handling , 1986, TOIS.

[4]  Randall H. Trigg,et al.  Design issues for a Dexter-based hypermedia system , 1992, ECHT '92.

[5]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey , 1987, Computer.

[6]  Frank G. Halasz,et al.  Reflections on NoteCards: seven issues for the next generation of hypermedia systems , 1987, Hypertext.

[7]  Betsy L. Humphreys,et al.  The UMLS Knowledge Sources: Tools for Building Better User Interfaces. , 1990 .

[8]  N. M. Delisle,et al.  Collaborative writing with hypertext , 1989 .

[9]  Mayer D. Schwartz,et al.  The Dexter Hypertext Reference Model , 1994, CACM.

[10]  Helen Ashman,et al.  Hypermedia Management in Large-Scale Information Systems Using the Functional Model of the Link , 1994, Australasian Database Conference.

[11]  Roy Rada,et al.  Hypertext Writing and Document Reuse: The Role of a Semantic Net , 1990, Electron. Publ..

[12]  John B. Smith,et al.  A hypertext writing environment and its cognitive basis (panel session) , 1987, Hypertext.

[13]  David M. Levy,et al.  Fixed or fluid?: document stability and new media , 1994, ECHT '94.

[14]  Mayer D. Schwartz,et al.  Contexts: a partitioning concept for hypertext , 1986, CSCW '86.

[15]  G. Halasz Frank,et al.  Reflections on NoteCards: seven issues for the next generation of hypermedia systems , 1987, CACM.

[16]  Norbert A. Streitz,et al.  SEPIA: a cooperative hypermedia authoring environment , 1992, ECHT '92.

[17]  Roy Rada,et al.  Expert systems and hypertext , 1988, Knowl. Eng. Rev..

[18]  George H. Collier,et al.  Thoth-II: hypertext with explicit semantics , 1987, Hypertext.

[19]  Roy Rada.  Hypertext: from Text to Expertext , 1994, SIGB.

[20]  Paul Kahn,et al.  IRIS hypermedia services , 1992, CACM.

[21]  Norbert A. Streitz,et al.  Coexistence and transformation of informal and formal structures: requirements for more flexible hypermedia systems , 1994, ECHT '94.

[22]  G. W. Furnas,et al.  Generalized fisheye views , 1986, CHI '86.