An interactive gravitational-wave detector model for museums and fairs

In 2015 the first observation of gravitational waves marked a breakthrough in astrophysics, and in technological research and development. The discovery of a gravitational-wave signal from the collision of two black holes, a billion light-years away, received considerable interest from the media and public. We describe the development of a purpose-built exhibit explaining this new area of research to a general audience. The core element of the exhibit is a working Michelson interferometer: a scaled-down version of the key technology used in gravitational-wave detectors. The Michelson interferometer is integrated into a hands-on exhibit, which allows for user interaction and simulated gravitational-wave observations. An interactive display provides a self-guided explanation of gravitational-wave related topics through video, animation, images and text. We detail the hardware and software used to create the exhibit, and discuss two installation variants: an independent learning experience in a museum setting (the Thinktank Birmingham Science Museum), and a science-festival with the presence of expert guides (the 2017 Royal Society Summer Science Exhibition). We assess audience reception in these two settings, describe the improvements we have made given this information, and discuss future public-engagement projects resulting from this work. The exhibit is found to be effective in communicating the new and unfamiliar field of gravitational-wave research to general audiences. An accompanying website provides parts lists and information for others to build their own version of this exhibit.

[1]  John H. Falk,et al.  Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium visitor learning , 2003 .

[2]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Out-of-School Time Science Activities and Their Association with Career Interest in STEM , 2012 .

[3]  Paul Wesley Scott,et al.  Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study , 2018 .

[4]  O. B. Assaraf,et al.  ‘I know how it works!’ student engagement with exhibits in a science museum , 2019, International Journal of Science Education, Part B.

[5]  Jill Hohenstein,et al.  Use of Questions in Exhibit Labels to Generate Explanatory Conversation among Science Museum Visitors , 2007 .

[6]  R. Smith,et al.  Computer-games for gravitational wave science outreach: Black Hole Pong and Space Time Quest , 2011, 1111.3899.

[7]  Visiting Science Museums During Middle and High School: A Longitudinal Analysis of Student Performance in Science , 2014 .

[8]  Sue Allen,et al.  Designing With Multiple Interactives: Five Common Pitfalls , 2004 .

[9]  P. J. Fox,et al.  A reliable, compact, and low-cost Michelson wavemeter for laser wavelength measurement , 1999 .

[10]  Bob Peart,et al.  Impact of Exhibit Type on Knowledge Gain, Attitudes, and Behavior , 1984 .

[11]  Lisa Sindorf,et al.  Creating a Female‐Responsive Design Framework for STEM exhibits , 2018, Curator: The Museum Journal.

[12]  Y. Wang,et al.  The basic physics of the binary black hole merger GW150914 , 2016, Annalen der Physik.

[13]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[14]  Scott L. Smith,et al.  Digital Storytelling in Museums: Observations and Best Practices , 2011 .

[15]  P. K. Panda,et al.  GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M$_\odot$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M$_\odot$ Compact Object , 2020, 2006.12611.

[16]  C. Broeck,et al.  Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , 2014, 1408.3978.

[17]  A. Lelliott.  Understanding Gravity: The Role of a School Visit to a Science Centre , 2014 .

[18]  Y. Wang,et al.  GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO. , 2016, Physical review. D..

[19]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[20]  John J. Koran,et al.  The Things of Science: Assessing the Learning Potential of Science Museums. , 1986 .

[21]  P. K. Panda,et al.  GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150  M_{⊙}. , 2020, Physical review letters.

[22]  The Ligo Scientific Collaboration,et al.  Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , 2016, 1602.03837.

[23]  S. Márka,et al.  Astronomy's New Messengers: A traveling exhibit on gravitational-wave physics , 2010 .

[24]  J. Falk,et al.  School Field Trips: Assessing Their Long-Term Impact , 1997 .

[25]  The Ligo Scientific Collaboration,et al.  GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , 2016, 1606.04855.

[26]  L. Massarani,et al.  Adolescents learning with exhibits and explainers: the case of Maloka , 2019, International Journal of Science Education, Part B.

[27]  Stephan Schwan,et al.  The Role of Authentic Objects in Museums of the History of Science and Technology: Findings from a visitor study , 2015 .

[28]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[29]  Cody Sandifer,et al.  Technological novelty and open‐endedness: Two characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum , 2003 .

[30]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  Interactives and Visitor Learning , 2004 .

[31]  B. A. Boom,et al.  ScholarWorks @ UTRGV ScholarWorks @ UTRGV Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914 Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914 , 2016 .

[32]  A. Freise,et al.  Interferometer techniques for gravitational-wave detection , 2017, Living reviews in relativity.

[33]  John H. Falk,et al.  Measuring the impact of a science center on its community , 2011 .

[34]  Lisa Sindorf,et al.  Exhibit Designs for Girls' Engagement ( EDGE ) , 2018, Curator: The Museum Journal.

[35]  B. A. Boom,et al.  First targeted search for gravitational-wave bursts from core-collapse supernovae in data of first-generation laser interferometer detectors , 2016 .

[36]  K. Riles,et al.  Recent searches for continuous gravitational waves , 2017, 1712.05897.

[37]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GW170608: Observation of a 19 Solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , 2017, 1711.05578.

[38]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs , 2018 .

[39]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Approximative Integration of the Field Equations of Gravitation , 1916 .

[40]  LIGO analogy lab—A set of undergraduate lab experiments to demonstrate some principles of gravitational wave detection , 2019, American Journal of Physics.

[41]  Hiroaki Yamamoto,et al.  Interferometer design of the KAGRA gravitational wave detector , 2013, 1306.6747.

[42]  John J. Koran,et al.  The Relationship of Age, Sex, Attention, and Holding Power with Two Types of Science Exhibits , 1986 .

[43]  John H. Falk,et al.  The Director's Cut: Toward an Improved Understanding of Learning from Museums , 2004 .

[44]  Dorothy Lozowski Boisvert,et al.  The relationship between visitor characteristics and learning‐associated behaviors in a science museum discovery space , 1994 .

[45]  Ben Gammon,et al.  Exhibiting Performance: Co‐participation in science centres and museums , 2007 .

[46]  L. Nadelson.  Who Is Watching and Who Is Playing: Parental Engagement with Children at a Hands-On Science Center , 2013 .

[47]  The Ligo Scientific Collaboration,et al.  GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral , 2017, 1710.05832.