BackgroundLaparoscopic instruments are rigid and thus cannot provide the degrees of freedom (DOF) needed by a surgeon in certain situations. A new generation of laparoscopic instruments with the ability to articulate their end effectors is available. Although these instruments offer the flexibility needed to perform complex tasks in a constricted surgical site, their control may be hampered by their increased complexity.MethodsThis study compared the task performance between articulating and conventional laparoscopic instruments. Surgeons with extensive laparoscopic experience (8 experts) and staff with no surgical experience (8 novices) were recruited for the test. Both groups were required to perform three standardized tasks (peg transfer, left-to-right suturing, and up-and-down suturing) in a bench top model using conventional and articulating instruments. Performance was scored using a standardized 100-point scale based on movement speed and accuracy. After the initial trials with conventional and articulating instruments, each participant was given a short orientation on how to use the articulating instrument advantageously. The participant then was retested with the articulating instrument.ResultsAs expected, the expert group scored significantly better than the novice group (p < 0.001). The combined data from both groups showed better performance with the conventional instruments than with the articulating instruments (p = 0.074). The experts maintained their proficient laparoscopic performance using conventional instruments in their first attempts with the articulating instruments (91 vs. 84), whereas the novices had greater difficulty with the articulating instruments than with the conventional instruments (46 vs. 59). After a short orientation, however, the novices outscored the expert group in terms of net improvement in performance with the articulating instrument (27 vs. 1% improvement).ConclusionExperienced surgeons are readily able to transfer their skills from conventional to articulating laparoscopic instruments. To speed the learning process, the use of articulating instruments can be started at an early stage of surgical training.
[1]
Warren D. Smith,et al.
An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity.
,
2003,
The Journal of surgical research.
[2]
Lee L Swanstrom,et al.
Beta test results of a new system assessing competence in laparoscopic surgery.
,
2006,
Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
[3]
G. Fried,et al.
Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.
,
1998,
American journal of surgery.
[4]
J. Dankelman,et al.
Problems with laparoscopic instruments: opinions of experts.
,
2001,
Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.
[5]
Bin Zheng,et al.
The Control Strategy for Degrees of Freedom in Remote Prehension with a Tool
,
2007
.
[6]
Vadim Sherman,et al.
Using simulators to assess laparoscopic competence: ready for widespread use?
,
2004,
Surgery.
[7]
Richard M Satava,et al.
The future of sugical simulation and surgical robotics.
,
2007,
Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.
[8]
D. Wilks,et al.
Establishing a simulation center for surgical skills: what to do and how to do it
,
2007,
Surgical Endoscopy.
[9]
Ara Darzi,et al.
Robotics in surgery
,
2002,
BMJ.