Frequency Subband Processing and Feature Analysis of Forward-Looking Ground-Penetrating Radar Signals for Land-Mine Detection

There has been significant amount of study on the use of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) for land-mine detection. This paper presents our analysis of GPR data collected at a U.S. Army test site using a new approach based on frequency subband processing. In this approach, from the radar data that have over 2.5 GHz of bandwidth, we compute separate radar images using the one wide (2 GHz) and four narrow (0.6 GHz) frequency subbands. The results indicate that signals for different frequency subbands are significantly different and give very different performance in land-mine detection. In addition, we also examine a number of features extracted from the GPR data, including magnitude and local-contrast features, ratio between copolarization and cross-polarization signals, and features obtained using polarimetric decomposition. Feature selection procedures are employed to find subsets of features that improve detection performance when combined. Results of land-mine detection, including performance on blind test lanes, are presented

[1]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Trained detection of buried mines in SAR images via the deflection-optimal criterion , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Eric Pottier,et al.  An entropy based classification scheme for land applications of polarimetric SAR , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  Chandra S. Throckmorton,et al.  Algorithms for land mine detection using the NIITEK ground penetrating radar , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  Joseph N. Wilson,et al.  Feature analysis for the NIITEK ground-penetrating radar using order-weighted averaging operators for landmine detection , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[5]  Klamer Schutte,et al.  Comparison of vehicle-mounted forward-looking polarimetric infrared and downward-looking infrared sensors for landmine detection , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  James M. Sabatier,et al.  Forward-looking acoustic mine detection system , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  William L. Cameron,et al.  Simulated polarimetric signatures of primitive geometrical shapes , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Michael D. Duncan,et al.  Anti-tank and side-attack mine detection with a forward-looking GPR , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[9]  Michael D. Duncan,et al.  Mine detection with a forward-looking ground-penetrating synthetic aperture radar , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Landmine detection using forward-looking GPR with object tracking , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  W. L. Cameron,et al.  Feature motivated polarization scattering matrix decomposition , 1990, IEEE International Conference on Radar.

[12]  Jian Li,et al.  Plastic landmine detection using time-frequency analysis for forward-looking ground-penetrating radar , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  Yijun Sun,et al.  Landmine detection using forward-looking ground penetrating radar , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[14]  Robin Rutherford,et al.  Infrared polarization sensor for forward-looking mine detection , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Feature analysis for forward-looking landmine detection using GPR , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[16]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[17]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Results from a forward-looking GPR mine detection system , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[18]  Guoqing Liu,et al.  SAR imaging for a forward-looking GPR system , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[19]  Joseph N. Wilson,et al.  Improving landmine detection using frequency domain features from ground penetrating radar , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.