A Genuine Rank-Dependent Generalization of the Von Neumann-Morgenstern Expected Utility Theorem

This paper uses "revealed probability trade-offs" to provide a natural foundation for probability weighting in the famous von Neumann and Morgenstern axiomatic set-up for expected utility. In particular, it shows that a rank-dependent preference functional is obtained in this set-up when the independence axiom is weakened to stochastic dominance and a probability trade-off consistency condition. In contrast with the existing axiomatizations of rank-dependent utility, the resulting axioms allow for complete flexibility regarding the outcome space. Consequently, a parameter-free test/elicitation of rank-dependent utility becomes possible. The probability-oriented approach of this paper also provides theoretical foundations for probabilistic attitudes towards risk. It is shown that the preference conditions that characterize the shape of the probability weighting function can be derived from simple probability trade-off conditions. Copyright The Econometric Society 2002.

[1]  N. Drouhin.  Lifetime Uncertainty and Time Preference , 2001 .

[2]  P. Wakker.  Testing and Characterizing Properties of Nonadditive Measures through Violations of the Sure-Thing Principle , 2001 .

[3]  M. Abdellaoui.  Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions , 2000 .

[4]  J. L. Pinto,et al.  A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis , 2000 .

[5]  A. Chateauneuf.  Comonotonicity axioms and rank-dependent expected utility theory for arbitrary consequences , 1999 .

[6]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  D. Prelec.  The Probability Weighting Function , 1998 .

[8]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function , 1996 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Risk Attitudes and Decision Weights , 1995 .

[10]  Yutaka Nakamura,et al.  Rank dependent utility for arbitrary consequence spaces , 1995 .

[11]  I. Erev,et al.  Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories , 1994 .

[12]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability , 1994 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[14]  Uzi Segal,et al.  Two Stage Lotteries Without the Reduction Axiom , 1990 .

[15]  Uzi Segal.  Anticipated utility: A measure representation approach , 1989 .

[16]  P. Wakker.  Additive Representations of Preferences: A New Foundation of Decision Analysis , 1988 .

[17]  C. S. Hong,et al.  Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities , 1987 .

[18]  Uzi Segal,et al.  The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach , 1987 .

[19]  J. Quiggin.  A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .

[20]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Subjectively weighted utility: A descriptive extension of the expected utility model , 1978 .

[21]  Jagdish Handa,et al.  Risk, Probabilities, and a New Theory of Cardinal Utility , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  M. G. Preston,et al.  An experimental study of the auction-value of an uncertain outcome. , 1948, The American journal of psychology.

[23]  M. Abdellaoui,et al.  The risk-structure dependence effect:Experimenting with an eye to decision-aiding , 1998, Ann. Oper. Res..

[24]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Common Consequence Conditions in Decision Making under Risk , 1998 .

[25]  P. Wakker.  Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion , 1994 .

[26]  P. Wakker.  Additive representations on rank-ordered sets: II. The topological approach , 1993 .

[27]  I. Gilboa.  Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities , 1987 .

[28]  M. Yaari.  The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk , 1987 .

[29]  J. Pratt.  RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .