A study of lead time variation impact on supply chain performance

Lead time (LT) is a core parameter that varies and affects all supply chain (SC) partners. LT uncertainty is known as a kind of supply uncertainty in the SC literature which attracts attention of many researchers. In this paper, impact of LT variability in a serially connected supply chain with 4 levels is investigated. The study includes two main stages: development of a structural model and testing the structural relations by using simulated data. Simulation makes it possible to remove effects of intervener variables in order to measure pure impact of LT uncertainty on SC. Regarding this matter, a structural relationship model with three hypotheses about direct and indirect impact of LT uncertainty on supply chain inventories have been developed. To test the proposed structural relations, simulated data were used. The results of the study show that by increasing the lead time variance, order variances increase while no impact on the bullwhip is observed, i.e. the order variances increase uniformly throughout the entire SC. Furthermore, results show that the increase in the lead time variance will lead to inventory fluctuations. One practical recommendation of this study is to apply an investment strategy to reduce the lead time uncertainty.

[1]  Steven Orla Kimbrough,et al.  Computers play the beer game: can artificial agents manage supply chains? , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Claes Fornell,et al.  Issues in the Application of Covariance Structure Analysis: A Comment , 1983 .

[3]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[4]  Frank Y. Chen,et al.  Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information.: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information. , 2000 .

[5]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[6]  Siwook Ryu,et al.  A stochastic inventory model of dual sourced supply chain with lead-time reduction , 2003 .

[7]  J. Machuca,et al.  THE IMPACT OF ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE ON REDUCING BULLWHIP EFFECT AND SUPPLY CHAIN INVENTORY COSTS , 2004 .

[8]  Metin Çakanyildirim,et al.  Random lead times and expedited orders in (Q, r) inventory systems , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Hui-Ming Wee,et al.  Optimal ordering decision for deteriorating items with expiration date and uncertain lead time , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[10]  Laura M. Birou,et al.  Build‐to‐order and just‐in‐time as predictors of applied supply chain knowledge and market performance , 2005 .

[11]  R. Shapiro,et al.  From supply chain to demand chain: the role of lead time reduction in improving demand chain performance , 2004 .

[12]  Jussi T. S. Heikkilä,et al.  TEACHING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT TO BUSINESS EXECUTIVES , 2000 .

[13]  Sanchoy K. Das,et al.  Modeling the flexibility of order quantities and lead-times in supply chains , 2003 .

[14]  Michael Hugos,et al.  Essentials of Supply Chain Management , 2002 .

[15]  Subhash Sharma.  Applied multivariate techniques , 1995 .

[16]  Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo,et al.  Inventory management in supply chains: a reinforcement learning approach , 2002 .

[17]  Terry P. Harrison,et al.  Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a supply chain with stochastic lead time , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Kut C. So,et al.  Impact of supplier's lead time and forecast demand updating on retailer's order quantity variability in a two-level supply chain , 2003 .

[19]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  Production, Manufacturing and Logistics An integrated production and inventory model to dampen upstream demand variability in the supply chain , 2006 .

[20]  Enver Yücesan,et al.  Transshipments: An emerging inventory recourse to achieve supply chain leagility , 2002 .