Producing Social Capital

This article analyzes the conceptual treatment of national social movement organizations (SMOs) in current debates over civil society and the decline of social capital in the United States. Despite the rapid growth of national organizations since the 1960s, civil society proponents systematically dismiss their relevance. The author argues instead that national SMOs play a critical role in civil society and the production of social capital by providing an infrastructure for collective action, facilitating the development of mediated collective identities that link otherwise marginalized members of society, and shaping public discourse and debate. Theories that exclude this form of citizen participation not only overlook the important ways that social capital and collective identity are constructed by national organizations, but they ultimately promote the continued marginalization of less powerful social groups.

[1]  Polite Protesters: The American Peace Movement of the 1980s , 1993 .

[2]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  K. L. Schlozman,et al.  Organized interests and American democracy , 1986 .

[4]  Jack L. Walker.  The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[5]  J. Freeman,et al.  The Origins of the Women's Liberation Movement , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  D. Colby.  Gays/Justice: A Study of Ethics, Society, and Law@@@The Rise of a Gay and Lesbian Movement , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[7]  R. Klatch.  Women of the New Right , 1986 .

[8]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1964) , 1974 .

[9]  Stephen Cornell.  The variable ties that bind: Content and circumstance in ethnic processes , 1996 .

[10]  Frances Fox Piven,et al.  Poor People''s Movements , 1977 .

[11]  K. Newton.  Social Capital and Democracy , 1997 .

[12]  Krishan Kumar,et al.  Civil-Society - An Inquiry Into The Usefulness Of An Historical Term , 1993 .

[13]  R. Putnam.  The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life , 1993 .

[14]  V. Taylor.  SOCIAL MOVEMENT CONTINUITY: THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT IN ABEYANCE* , 1989 .

[15]  R. Fantasia.  Cultures of Solidarity , 1988 .

[16]  Jean Louise Cohen,et al.  Civil Society and Political Theory , 2020, Crime, Inequality and the State.

[17]  Eric Hirsch,et al.  Sacrifice for the Cause: Group Processes, Recruitment, and Commitment in a Student Social Movement. , 1990 .

[18]  William A. Gamson,et al.  Commitment and agency in social movements , 1991 .

[19]  Larry Diamond,et al.  Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation , 2008 .

[20]  J. Gamson,et al.  Must Identity Movements Self-Destruct? A Queer Dilemma , 1995 .

[21]  Debra C. Minkoff.  The sequencing of social movements , 1997 .

[22]  R. Putnam.  Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America , 1995, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[23]  M. Zald,et al.  The Political Economy of Social Movement Sectors , 1983 .

[24]  S. K. Houseknecht,et al.  Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood , 1985 .

[25]  Bob Edwards,et al.  The Paradox of Civil Society , 1996 .

[26]  Organizing for Equality: The Evolution of Women's and Racial-Ethnic Organizations in America, 1955-1985 , 1996 .

[27]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[28]  M. W. Foley,et al.  Editors' Introduction , 1997 .

[29]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  David Held,et al.  Political Theory and the Modern State , 1989 .

[31]  C. Bryant.  Social self-organisation, civility and sociology. A comment on Kumar's civil society , 1993 .

[32]  J. Berry,et al.  The Interest Group Society , 1984 .

[33]  John D’Emilio.  Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: Second Edition , 1998 .