Some Behavioural Aspects of Information Use in Decision Making: A Study of Clinical Judgements

[1]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  REPLY TO THE DEVIL'S ADVOCATES: DON'T CONFOUND MODEL TESTING AND MEASUREMENT , 1974 .

[2]  Paul E. Green,et al.  EVALUATION OF MULTIATTRIBUTE ALTERNATIVES: ADDITIVE VERSUS CONFIGURAL UTILITY MEASUREMENT , 1974 .

[3]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  The devil rides again: Correlation as an index of fit. , 1973 .

[4]  I. Vertinsky.  Methodology for social planning: simulation and experimentation processes for participatory social development , 1972 .

[5]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment. , 1971 .

[6]  Lewis R. Goldberg,et al.  Five models of clinical judgment: An empirical comparison between linear and nonlinear representations of the human inference process , 1971 .

[7]  R. Dawes.  A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. , 1971 .

[8]  H. J. Einhorn.  Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information , 1971 .

[9]  H. J. Einhorn.  The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Fred Kort,et al.  A Nonlinear Model for the Analysis of Judicial Decisions , 1968, American Political Science Review.

[11]  P. Slovic,et al.  An analysis-of-variance model for the assessment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  P Slovic,et al.  Cue-consistency and cue-utilization in judgment. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[13]  P. Hoffman.  The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. , 1960, Psychological bulletin.