Techniques to enhance a QUBO solver for permutation-based combinatorial optimization

Many combinatorial optimization problems can be formulated as a problem to determine the order of sequence or to find a corresponding mapping of the objects. We call such problems permutation-based optimization problems. Many such problems can be formulated as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) or Ising model by introducing a penalty coefficient to the permutation constraint terms. While classical and quantum annealing approaches have been proposed to solve QUBOs to date, they face issues with optimality and feasibility. Here we treat a given QUBO solver as a black box and propose techniques to enhance its performance. First, to ensure an effective search for good quality solutions, a smooth energy landscape is needed; we propose a data scaling approach that reduces the amplitudes of the input without compromising optimality. Second, we need to tune the penalty coefficient. In this paper, we illustrate that for certain problems, it suffices to tune the parameter by performing random sampling on the penalty coefficients to achieve good performance. Finally, to handle possible infeasibility of the solution, we introduce a polynomial-time projection algorithm. We apply these techniques along with a divide-and-conquer strategy to solve some large-scale permutation-based problems and present results for TSP and QAP.

[1]  Yuan Hong,et al.  A distance matrix based algorithm for solving the traveling salesman problem , 2020, Oper. Res..

[2]  Avradip Mandal,et al.  On Modeling Local Search with Special-Purpose Combinatorial Optimization Hardware , 2019, ArXiv.

[3]  Susmit Jha,et al.  Estimating the Density of States of Boolean Satisfiability Problems on Classical and Quantum Computing Platforms , 2019, AAAI.

[4]  Takuya Akiba,et al.  Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework , 2019, KDD.

[5]  Travis S. Humble,et al.  Application of Quantum Annealing to Nurse Scheduling Problem , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Tobias Stollenwerk,et al.  Flight Gate Assignment with a Quantum Annealer , 2018, QTOP@NetSys.

[7]  Fred W. Glover,et al.  Quantum Bridge Analytics I: a tutorial on formulating and using QUBO models , 2018, 4OR.

[8]  Stefan Hougardy,et al.  Hard to solve instances of the Euclidean Traveling Salesman Problem , 2018, Mathematical Programming Computation.

[9]  Toshiyuki Miyazawa,et al.  Physics-Inspired Optimization for Quadratic Unconstrained Problems Using a Digital Annealer , 2018, Front. Phys..

[10]  Marco Lanzagorta,et al.  A cross-disciplinary introduction to quantum annealing-based algorithms , 2018, 1803.03372.

[11]  J. Christopher Beck,et al.  A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Approach to Solving Scheduling Problems , 2016, SOCS.

[12]  J. Christopher Beck,et al.  Explorations of Quantum-Classical Approaches to Scheduling a Mars Lander Activity Problem , 2016, AAAI Workshop: Planning for Hybrid Systems.

[13]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  Hyperopt: a Python library for model selection and hyperparameter optimization , 2015 .

[14]  Andrew Lucas,et al.  Ising formulations of many NP problems , 2013, Front. Physics.

[15]  Siti Mariyam Shamsuddin,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization: Technique, System and Challenges , 2011 .

[16]  Nair Maria Maia de Abreu,et al.  A survey for the quadratic assignment problem , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Ayhan Demiriz,et al.  Constrained K-Means Clustering , 2000 .

[18]  P. Tian,et al.  Application of the simulated annealing algorithm to the combinatorial optimisation problem with permutation property: An investigation of generation mechanism , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  P. Suganthan Particle swarm optimiser with neighbourhood operator , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[20]  Franz Rendl,et al.  QAPLIB – A Quadratic Assignment Problem Library , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[21]  É. Taillard COMPARISON OF ITERATIVE SEARCHES FOR THE QUADRATIC ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM. , 1995 .

[22]  S. E. Karisch,et al.  QAPLIB-A quadratic assignment problem library , 1991 .

[23]  Gerhard Reinelt,et al.  TSPLIB - A Traveling Salesman Problem Library , 1991, INFORMS J. Comput..

[24]  Éric D. Taillard,et al.  Robust taboo search for the quadratic assignment problem , 1991, Parallel Comput..

[25]  A. Volgenant,et al.  A shortest augmenting path algorithm for dense and sparse linear assignment problems , 1987, Computing.

[26]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  The Traveling-Salesman Problem and Minimum Spanning Trees , 1970, Oper. Res..

[27]  Davide Venturelli,et al.  Quantum Annealing Implementation of Job-Shop Scheduling , 2015, 1506.08479.

[28]  Abdel Nasser,et al.  A Survey of the Quadratic Assignment Problem , 2014 .

[29]  David D. Cox,et al.  Hyperopt: A Python Library for Optimizing the Hyperparameters of Machine Learning Algorithms , 2013, SciPy.

[30]  Endre Boros,et al.  Preprocessing of unconstrained quadratic binary optimization , 2006 .

[31]  Alice E. Smith,et al.  Penalty functions , 1996 .

[32]  Charles Fleurent,et al.  Genetic Hybrids for the Quadratic Assignment Problem , 1993, Quadratic Assignment and Related Problems.

[33]  Inyong Ham,et al.  A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine, n-job flow-shop sequencing problem , 1983 .