NON-FRAGILE CONTROLLERS OF PEAK GAIN MINIMIZATION FOR UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS VIA LMI APPROACH

This paper is concerned with the problem of robust peak-to-peak gain mini- mization by linear matrix inequality (LMI) approach. Instead of minimizing the robustly induced L1-norm, we minimize its upper bound. Results on the state-feedback controllers are obtained by this approach, and the controllers are at most the same order as the plant. One of the main results shows that if there exists a linear dynamic state-feedback controller that achieves a certain level of robust performance, then there exists a static, linear, state- feedback controller that achieves the same performance level, and vice versa. Moreover, the existence of such controllers are equivalent to the existence of solution of an LMI prob- lem. Based on the result, a sucient condition for obtaining non-fragile state-feedback controller is presented. The condition guarantees simultaneously disturbance rejection in invariant set sense in (2) and the level of performance in (1). Keywords. Uncertain systems, peak-to-peak gain minimization, persistent disturbances, L1-control, non-fragile controllers. AMS (MOS) subject classification: 34K20, 34K35, 34H05, 93D09.

[1]  J. Pearson,et al.  L^{1} -optimal compensators for continuous-time systems , 1987 .

[2]  J. Pearson,et al.  L1-optimal compensators for continuous-time systems , 1986, 1986 25th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  Franco Blanchini Feedback control for linear time-invariant systems with state and control bounds in the presence of disturbances , 1990 .

[4]  P. Khargonekar,et al.  Robust stabilization of uncertain linear systems: quadratic stabilizability and H/sup infinity / control theory , 1990 .

[5]  E. Yaz Linear Matrix Inequalities In System And Control Theory , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  M. Dahleh,et al.  Control of Uncertain Systems: A Linear Programming Approach , 1995 .

[7]  Lin Huang,et al.  Robustness analysis and synthesis of SISO systems under both plant and controller perturbations ( , 2001 .

[8]  Franco Blanchini,et al.  Rational L1 Suboptimal Compensators for Continuous-Time Systems , 1993, 1993 American Control Conference.

[9]  Mathukumalli Vidyasagar,et al.  Optimal rejection of persistent bounded disturbances , 1986 .

[10]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequalities in Systems and Control Theory , 1994 .

[11]  F. Blanchini Ultimate boundedness control for uncertain discrete-time systems via set-induced Lyapunov functions , 1994, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[12]  P. Khargonekar,et al.  Mixed H/sub 2//H/sub infinity / control: a convex optimization approach , 1991 .

[13]  J. Shamma Nonlinear state feedback for l 1 optimal control , 1993 .

[14]  J. Shamma Optimization of the l∞-induced norm under full state feedback , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[15]  Franco Blanchini,et al.  Rational L 1 Suboptimal Compensators for Continuous-Time Systems , 1993 .

[16]  K. Poolla,et al.  A linear matrix inequality approach to peak‐to‐peak gain minimization , 1996 .

[17]  Vladimir A. Yakubovich,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory (S. Boyd, L. E. Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan) , 1995, SIAM Rev..

[18]  Franco Blanchini,et al.  Nonquadratic Lyapunov functions for robust control , 1995, Autom..