Computational Analysis of Viscoelastic Properties of Crosslinked Actin Networks

Mechanical force plays an important role in the physiology of eukaryotic cells whose dominant structural constituent is the actin cytoskeleton composed mainly of actin and actin crosslinking proteins (ACPs). Thus, knowledge of rheological properties of actin networks is crucial for understanding the mechanics and processes of cells. We used Brownian dynamics simulations to study the viscoelasticity of crosslinked actin networks. Two methods were employed, bulk rheology and segment-tracking rheology, where the former measures the stress in response to an applied shear strain, and the latter analyzes thermal fluctuations of individual actin segments of the network. It was demonstrated that the storage shear modulus (G′) increases more by the addition of ACPs that form orthogonal crosslinks than by those that form parallel bundles. In networks with orthogonal crosslinks, as crosslink density increases, the power law exponent of G′ as a function of the oscillation frequency decreases from 0.75, which reflects the transverse thermal motion of actin filaments, to near zero at low frequency. Under increasing prestrain, the network becomes more elastic, and three regimes of behavior are observed, each dominated by different mechanisms: bending of actin filaments, bending of ACPs, and at the highest prestrain tested (55%), stretching of actin filaments and ACPs. In the last case, only a small portion of actin filaments connected via highly stressed ACPs support the strain. We thus introduce the concept of a ‘supportive framework,’ as a subset of the full network, which is responsible for high elasticity. Notably, entropic effects due to thermal fluctuations appear to be important only at relatively low prestrains and when the average crosslinking distance is comparable to or greater than the persistence length of the filament. Taken together, our results suggest that viscoelasticity of the actin network is attributable to different mechanisms depending on the amount of prestrain.

[1]  D H Wachsstock,et al.  Cross-linker dynamics determine the mechanical properties of actin gels. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[2]  Nikita Ter-Oganessian,et al.  Active microrheology of networks composed of semiflexible polymers: computer simulation of magnetic tweezers. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[4]  D A Weitz,et al.  Microrheology probes length scale dependent rheology. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[5]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Reversible stress softening of actin networks , 2007, Nature.

[6]  David C. Morse,et al.  VISCOELASTICITY OF TIGHTLY ENTANGLED SOLUTIONS OF SEMIFLEXIBLE POLYMERS , 1998 .

[7]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Rheology and microrheology of semiflexible polymer solutions : Actin filament networks , 1998 .

[8]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Oliver Lieleg,et al.  Micro- and macrorheological properties of isotropically cross-linked actin networks. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[10]  P. Janmey,et al.  Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[11]  A. Bausch,et al.  Viscoelasticity of isotropically cross-linked actin networks. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[12]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[13]  D A Weitz,et al.  Relating microstructure to rheology of a bundled and cross-linked F-actin network in vitro. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  P. Onck,et al.  Three-dimensional cross-linked F-actin networks: relation between network architecture and mechanical behavior. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[15]  Ashok Prasad,et al.  Elasticity of semiflexible polymers in two dimensions. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Ning Wang,et al.  Rheology of airway smooth muscle cells is associated with cytoskeletal contractile stress. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  Thomas D Pollard,et al.  Real-time measurements of actin filament polymerization by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Yiider Tseng,et al.  Functional Synergy of Actin Filament Cross-linking Proteins* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  F C MacKintosh,et al.  Distinct regimes of elastic response and deformation modes of cross-linked cytoskeletal and semiflexible polymer networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[21]  A. Bausch,et al.  Cytoskeletal polymer networks: The molecular structure of cross-linkers determines macroscopic properties , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Brenton D Hoffman,et al.  The role of F-actin and myosin in epithelial cell rheology. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[23]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  High-frequency stress relaxation in semiflexible polymer solutions and networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[24]  D A Weitz,et al.  Visualizing the strain field in semiflexible polymer networks: strain fluctuations and nonlinear rheology of F-actin gels. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[25]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Dynamic shear modulus of a semiflexible polymer network , 1998 .

[26]  T D Pollard,et al.  Dynamic Cross-linking by α-Actinin Determines the Mechanical Properties of Actin Filament Networks* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Fast and slow dynamics of the cytoskeleton , 2006, Nature Materials.

[28]  Jan K. G. Dhonta,et al.  Inhomogeneous suspensions of rigid rods in flow , 2002 .

[29]  D A Weitz,et al.  Stress-dependent elasticity of composite actin networks as a model for cell behavior. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[30]  D A Weitz,et al.  Microrheology of entangled F-actin solutions. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[31]  Oliver Lieleg,et al.  Rheological Characterization of the Bundling Transition in F-Actin Solutions Induced by Methylcellulose , 2008, PloS one.

[32]  D A Weitz,et al.  Prestressed F-actin networks cross-linked by hinged filamins replicate mechanical properties of cells. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Mechanics of living cells measured by laser tracking microrheology. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[34]  D. Ingber,et al.  Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[35]  D A Pink,et al.  Active microrheology of networks composed of semiflexible polymers: theory and comparison with simulations. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Particle Tracking Microrheology of Complex Fluids , 1997 .

[37]  T D Pollard,et al.  Mechanical properties of actin filament networks depend on preparation, polymerization conditions, and storage of actin monomers. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[38]  D. Weitz,et al.  Elastic Behavior of Cross-Linked and Bundled Actin Networks , 2004, Science.

[39]  F. C. MacKintosh,et al.  Microscopic Viscoelasticity: Shear Moduli of Soft Materials Determined from Thermal Fluctuations , 1997 .

[40]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  High-frequency viscoelasticity of crosslinked actin filament networks measured by diffusing wave spectroscopy , 1998 .

[41]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Strain Hardening of Actin Filament Networks , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  T van Dillen,et al.  Alternative explanation of stiffening in cross-linked semiflexible networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[43]  Brenton D. Hoffman,et al.  The consensus mechanics of cultured mammalian cells , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  H. Lodish.  Molecular Cell Biology , 1986 .

[45]  Mary C Boyce,et al.  Constitutive modeling of the stress-strain behavior of F-actin filament networks. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[46]  David A Weitz,et al.  The cell as a material. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.

[47]  F. C. MacKintosh,et al.  Determining Microscopic Viscoelasticity in Flexible and Semiflexible Polymer Networks from Thermal Fluctuations , 1997 .

[48]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Computational Analysis of a Cross-linked Actin-like Network , 2009 .

[49]  A. C. Maggs,et al.  Dynamics and rheology of actin solutions , 1996 .

[50]  Alex J Levine,et al.  Unfolding cross-linkers as rheology regulators in F-actin networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[51]  D. Navajas,et al.  Scaling the microrheology of living cells. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[52]  D A Weitz,et al.  Scaling of F-actin network rheology to probe single filament elasticity and dynamics. , 2004, Physical review letters.