How does similarity-based interference affect the choice of referring expression?

We tested a cue-based retrieval model that predicts how similarity between discourse entities influences the speaker’s choice of referring expressions. In Experiment 1, speakers produced fewer pronouns (relative to repeated noun phrases) when the competitor was in the same situation as the referent (both on a horse) rather than in a different situation (only the referent on a horse). The situational congruence had a larger impact when it was relevant to the to-be-described action (getting off a horse) than otherwise (taking off a hat), suggesting that the effect of similarity is modulated by its relevance to other conceptual representations held by the speaker. Experiment 2 found an effect of the competitor’s similarity regardless of whether pronouns were ambiguous or not, suggesting that the effect is independent of ambiguity avoidance and results from speaker-internal production constraints.

[1]  H. H. Clark,et al.  References in Conversation Between Experts and Novices , 1987 .

[2]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[3]  Mira Ariel Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .

[4]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Circumscribing Referential Domains during Real-Time Language Comprehension , 2002 .

[5]  A. J. Hull,et al.  INFORMATION, ACOUSTIC CONFUSION AND MEMORY SPAN. , 1964, British journal of psychology.

[6]  T. Givon Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .

[7]  R. Krauss,et al.  Changes in reference phrases as a function of frequency of usage in social interaction: a preliminary study , 1964 .

[8]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation , 2001 .

[9]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[10]  C Philip Beaman,et al.  The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: what role for working memory capacity? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[12]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  Real-Time Investigation of Referential Domains in Unscripted Conversation: A Targeted Language Game Approach , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. , 1992 .

[14]  Gillian Cohen,et al.  Why is it difficult to put names to faces , 1990 .

[15]  John R. Anderson A spreading activation theory of memory. , 1983 .

[16]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[17]  W. Chafe Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[18]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Martin J Pickering,et al.  The use of visual context during the production of referring expressions , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  Cognitive Status and the form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993, The Oxford Handbook of Reference.

[21]  Robert Dale,et al.  Computational Interpretations of the Gricean Maxims in the Generation of Referring Expressions , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  Rob Ellis,et al.  Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  R. Gerrig,et al.  Speakers’ experiences and audience design: knowing when and knowing how to adjust utterances to addressees☆ , 2002 .

[25]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Retrieving Personal Names, Referring Expressions, and Terms of Address , 2010 .

[26]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  A formal model of capacity limits in working memory , 2006 .

[27]  B. Keysar,et al.  When do speakers take into account common ground? , 1996, Cognition.

[28]  A Calder,et al.  An Interactive Activation Model of Face Naming , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[29]  D. Norris,et al.  THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49A (1), 80 ± 115 Unchained Memory: Error Patterns Rule out Chaining Models of Immediate Serial Recall , 2022 .

[30]  William S. Horton,et al.  Conversational Common Ground and Memory Processes in Language Production , 2005 .

[31]  K Lamberts,et al.  A feature-sampling account of the time course of old-new recognition judgments. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  The separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm , 2009, NeuroImage.

[33]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[34]  J. Neils-Strunjas,et al.  'What's his name?' A comparison of elderly participants' and undergraduate students' misnamings. , 2002, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[35]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[36]  R. Gerrig,et al.  The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production , 2005, Cognition.

[37]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[39]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Pragmatic Versus Form-Based Accounts of Referential Contrast: Evidence for Effects of Informativity Expectations , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[40]  Satoru Saito,et al.  On the nature of forgetting and the processing–storage relationship in reading span performance ☆ , 2004 .

[41]  Tim Valentine,et al.  From Monroe to Moreau: An analysis of face naming errors , 1992, Cognition.

[42]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Naming and Describing in Social Communication , 1980 .

[43]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[44]  W. Chafe The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production , 1980 .

[45]  A. Caramazza How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[46]  A. Collins,et al.  Does category size affect categorization time , 1970 .

[47]  R. Nosofsky Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  R. Krauss,et al.  Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[50]  T. Givón Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction , 1983 .

[51]  G. Dell,et al.  Stages of lexical access in language production , 1992, Cognition.

[52]  Kumiko Fukumura,et al.  Speakers use their own discourse model to determine referents' accessibility during the production of referring expressions. , 2009 .

[53]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Subject and topic , 1979 .

[54]  C. Fletcher Markedness and topic continuity in discourse processing , 1984 .

[55]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  Victor S. Ferreira,et al.  How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions? , 2005, Cognition.

[57]  Peter D. Bricker,et al.  The role of audible and visible back-channel responses in interpersonal communication. , 1977 .

[58]  Evan Heit,et al.  Feature-sampling and random-walk models of individual-stimulus recognition. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[59]  Kumiko Fukumura,et al.  The effect of animacy on the choice of referring expression , 2011 .

[60]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[61]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[62]  D. C. Lecompte,et al.  The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[63]  Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al.  Choosing anaphoric expressions : do people take into account likelihood of reference? , 2010 .

[64]  Mark Steedman Speech, Place, and Action , 1982 .

[65]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992 .

[66]  J. S. Nairne The myth of the encoding-retrieval match , 2002, Memory.

[67]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[68]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[69]  J. S. Nairne A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[70]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[71]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Acoustic similarity and retroactive interference in short-term memory , 1965 .

[72]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events , 1994 .