Network pharmacology modeling identifies synergistic Aurora B and ZAK interaction in triple-negative breast cancer

Cancer cells with heterogeneous mutation landscapes and extensive functional redundancy easily develop resistance to monotherapies by emerging activation of compensating or bypassing pathways. To achieve more effective and sustained clinical responses, synergistic interactions of multiple druggable targets that inhibit redundant cancer survival pathways are often required. Here, we report a systematic polypharmacology strategy to predict, test, and understand the selective drug combinations for MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells. We started by applying our network pharmacology model to predict synergistic drug combinations. Next, by utilizing kinome-wide drug-target profiles and gene expression data, we pinpointed a synergistic target interaction between Aurora B and ZAK kinase inhibition that led to enhanced growth inhibition and cytotoxicity, as validated by combinatorial siRNA, CRISPR/Cas9, and drug combination experiments. The mechanism of such a context-specific target interaction was elucidated using a dynamic simulation of MDA-MB-231 signaling network, suggesting a cross-talk between p53 and p38 pathways. Our results demonstrate the potential of polypharmacological modeling to systematically interrogate target interactions that may lead to clinically actionable and personalized treatment options.Network pharmacology modeling reveals synergistic drug combinationsTriple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease that easily develops drug resistance. To achieve more effective clinical responses, synergistic drug combinations that inhibit multiple survival pathways of cancer are urgently needed. However, pinpointing these drug combinations is difficult, as the number of possible combinations grows exponentially. Tang and co-workers from the University of Helsinki, University of Copenhagen, and University of Heidelberg developed a network pharmacology modeling approach to predict synergistic drug combinations and their underlying target interactions. With dynamic simulation of signaling pathways, they identified a synergistic target interaction that involved Aurora B and ZAK that play a critical role in regulating the survival of TNBC cells. These new combinatorial drug targets warrant further exploration of clinical benefits in treating TNBC.

[1]  Mindy I. Davis,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  Krister Wennerberg,et al.  Corrigendum to “Searching for drug synergy in complex dose–response landscapes using an interaction potency model” [Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 13 (2015) 504–513] , 2017, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[3]  Sanna Timonen,et al.  Patient-Customized Drug Combination Prediction and Testing for T-cell Prolymphocytic Leukemia Patients. , 2018, Cancer research.

[4]  Benjamin E. Gross,et al.  Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the cBioPortal , 2013, Science Signaling.

[5]  Andre S. Ribeiro,et al.  SGNS2: a compartmentalized stochastic chemical kinetics simulator for dynamic cell populations , 2012, Bioinform..

[6]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity , 2012, Nature.

[7]  P. B. Warren,et al.  Steady-state parameter sensitivity in stochastic modeling via trajectory reweighting. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[8]  Tero Aittokallio,et al.  Network Pharmacology Strategies Toward Multi-Target Anticancer Therapies: From Computational Models to Experimental Design Principles , 2014, Current pharmaceutical design.

[9]  Simon P. Langdon,et al.  Customizing the Therapeutic Response of Signaling Networks to Promote Antitumor Responses by Drug Combinations , 2014, Front. Oncol..

[10]  Mudita Singhal,et al.  COPASI - a COmplex PAthway SImulator , 2006, Bioinform..

[11]  Pedro Mendes,et al.  An Overview of Network-Based and -Free Approaches for Stochastic Simulation of Biochemical Systems , 2018, Comput..

[12]  Peter K. Sorger,et al.  Combination Cancer Therapy Can Confer Benefit via Patient-to-Patient Variability without Drug Additivity or Synergy , 2017, Cell.

[13]  Krister Wennerberg,et al.  Systematic Mapping of Kinase Addiction Combinations in Breast Cancer Cells by Integrating Drug Sensitivity and Selectivity Profiles. , 2015, Chemistry & biology.

[14]  Krister Wennerberg,et al.  TIMMA-R: an R package for predicting synergistic multi-targeted drug combinations in cancer cell lines or patient-derived samples , 2015, Bioinform..

[15]  Shiyun Ling,et al.  TopBP1 Mediates Mutant p53 Gain of Function through NF-Y and p63/p73 , 2011, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[16]  Tao Xu,et al.  Target Inhibition Networks: Predicting Selective Combinations of Druggable Targets to Block Cancer Survival Pathways , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  A. Hopkins Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[18]  Krister Wennerberg,et al.  Quantitative scoring of differential drug sensitivity for individually optimized anticancer therapies , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[20]  D. Morgens,et al.  Systematic comparison of CRISPR-Cas9 and RNAi screens for essential genes , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  J. Balko,et al.  Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease , 2016, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Krister Wennerberg,et al.  Identification of selective cytotoxic and synthetic lethal drug responses in triple negative breast cancer cells , 2016, Molecular Cancer.

[23]  Lisa A Carey,et al.  Clinical trials in triple negative breast cancer. , 2010, Breast disease.

[24]  D. Walerych,et al.  The rebel angel: mutant p53 as the driving oncogene in breast cancer , 2012, Carcinogenesis.

[25]  D. Fabbro,et al.  Advances in kinase targeting: current clinical use and clinical trials. , 2014, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[26]  G. Del Sal,et al.  Targeting triple negative breast cancer: is p53 the answer? , 2013, Cancer treatment reviews.

[27]  Sriganesh Srihari,et al.  Targeted Therapies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Combating a Stubborn Disease. , 2015, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[28]  Justin M Balko,et al.  Rationale for targeting the Ras/MAPK pathway in triple-negative breast cancer. , 2014, Discovery medicine.

[29]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  OmniPath: guidelines and gateway for literature-curated signaling pathway resources , 2016, Nature Methods.

[30]  Jason I. Herschkowitz,et al.  Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[31]  D. Yardley,et al.  Updates in the treatment of basal/triple-negative breast cancer , 2013, Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[32]  B. Al-Lazikani,et al.  Combinatorial drug therapy for cancer in the post-genomic era , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[33]  Florent Baty,et al.  Dose-Response Analysis Using R , 2015, PloS one.

[34]  Bissan Al-Lazikani,et al.  Large-Scale Profiling of Kinase Dependencies in Cancer Cell Lines , 2016, Cell reports.

[35]  Krister Wennerberg,et al.  Corrigendum to “Searching for drug synergy in complex dose–response landscapes using an interaction potency model” [Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 13 (2015) 504–513] , 2017, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[36]  Zheng Wang,et al.  Mixed lineage kinase ZAK promotes epithelial–mesenchymal transition in cancer progression , 2018, Cell Death & Disease.

[37]  Daniel T Gillespie,et al.  Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics. , 2007, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[38]  Thomas D. Wu,et al.  A comprehensive transcriptional portrait of human cancer cell lines , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  E. Richardsen,et al.  Macrophage-colony stimulating factor (CSF1) predicts breast cancer progression and mortality. , 2015, Anticancer research.

[40]  J. Condeelis,et al.  Autocrine CSF1R signaling mediates switching between invasion and proliferation downstream of TGFβ in claudin-low breast tumor cells , 2014, Oncogene.

[41]  Weiqing Wang,et al.  Perturbation Biology: Inferring Signaling Networks in Cellular Systems , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  Florent Baty,et al.  Dose-Response Analysis Using R , 2015, PLoS ONE.