Importance of the vane exit Mach number on the axial clearance-related losses

More efficient and physically smaller axial turbine designs are promoted to lower emissions and increase revenue. The physical size and the weight of the axial turbine can be minimised by adjusting the distance between successive stator and rotor rows. The influence of changing stator–rotor axial clearance can usually have either a positive or a negative influence on the turbine performance, and the reasons for this varying behaviour are not currently fully understood. A previous study revealed several design parameters that correlate with the efficiency curve shape. However, the effects of two parameters, namely the stator outlet Mach number and the reduced blade passing frequency, still remained unclear. Therefore, a novel approach is taken to analyse the correlations between the two design parameters and the axial clearance efficiency curve shape. Several different turbines are analysed using data available in the literature, and also new data are presented. The study suggests that the stator outlet Mach number correlates reasonably well with the efficiency curve shape, and it was further linked to five loss mechanisms and the rotational speed. Although the unsteady interaction plays an important role in the loss share, the level of unsteadiness did not correlate with the efficiency curve shape.

[1]  R. Niehuis,et al.  Axial Loss Development in Low Pressure Turbine Cascades , 2013 .

[2]  Michael Henke,et al.  Unsteady Wake-Blade Interaction: A Correlation Between Surface Pressure Fluctuations and Loss Generation , 2012 .

[3]  H. D. Li,et al.  Toward Intra-Row Gap Optimization for One and Half Stage Transonic Compressor , 2005 .

[4]  Aki Grönman,et al.  Influence of the axial turbine design parameters on the stator–rotor axial clearance losses , 2014 .

[5]  Markus Jöcker,et al.  Numerical Investigation of the Aerodynamic Vibration Excitation of High-Pressure Turbine Rotors , 2002 .

[6]  Steen A. Sjolander,et al.  An Empirical Prediction Method for Secondary Losses in Turbines: Part II — A New Secondary Loss Correlation , 2005 .

[7]  Giacomo Bruno Azzurro Persico,et al.  Effects of Axial Gap on the Vane-Rotor Interaction in a Low Aspect Ratio Turbine Stage , 2010 .

[8]  Jaikrishnan R. Kadambi,et al.  A Transport Model for the Deterministic Stresses Associated With Turbomachinery Blade Row Interactions , 2000 .

[9]  Joerg R. Seume,et al.  Time-Resolved Numerical Study of Axial Gap Effects on Labyrinth-Seal Leakage and Secondary Flow in a LP Turbine , 2013 .

[10]  Stavros Tavoularis,et al.  Effect of the Axial Spacing between Vanes and Blades on a Transonic Gas Turbine Performance and Blade Loading , 2013 .

[11]  Steen A. Sjolander,et al.  Midspan Flow-Field Measurements for Two Transonic Linear Turbine Cascades at Off-Design Conditions , 2001 .

[12]  Ken-ichi Funazaki,et al.  Experimental Studies on Unsteady Aerodynamic Loss of a High-Pressure Turbine Cascade , 1997 .

[13]  Guillermo Paniagua,et al.  Transonic Turbine Stage Heat Transfer Investigation in Presence of Strong Shocks , 2007 .

[14]  Peter Jeschke,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Analysis of the Effect of Variable Blade Row Spacing in a Subsonic Axial Turbine , 2013 .

[15]  Daniel J. Dorney,et al.  Simulations of the unsteady flow through the Fastrac Supersonic Turbine , 2000 .

[16]  Antonio Giovanni Perdichizzi.  Mach Number Effects on Secondary Flow Development Downstream of a Turbine Cascade , 1990 .

[17]  Yavuz Guendogdu,et al.  Clocking Effects on Surface-Pressure Fluctuations for Variable Axial-Gaps , 2013 .

[18]  Reza S. Abhari,et al.  Unsteady numerical investigation of the effect of wakes with eddy shedding in different axial turbine aerofoils , 2009 .

[19]  Martin G. Rose,et al.  The Thermodynamics of Wake Blade Interaction in Axial Flow Turbines: Combined Experimental and Computational Study , 2013 .

[20]  Kazutoyo Yamada,et al.  Influences of Axial Gap Between Blade Rows on Secondary Flows and Aerodynamic Performance in a Turbine Stage , 2009 .

[21]  Reza S. Abhari,et al.  Experimentally Observed Unsteady Work at Inlet to and Exit From an Axial Flow Turbine Rotor , 2012 .

[22]  Teemu Turunen-Saaresti,et al.  Influence of the Different Design Parameters to the Centrifugal Compressor Tip Clearance Loss , 2011 .

[23]  F. Martelli,et al.  Investigation of the Unsteady Rotor Aerodynamics in a Transonic Turbine Stage , 2000 .

[24]  Vincenzo Dossena,et al.  Investigation of the Flow Field in a High-Pressure Turbine Stage for Two Stator-Rotor Axial Gaps—Part II: Unsteady Flow Field , 2007 .

[25]  Vincenzo Dossena,et al.  Investigation of the Flow Field in a High-Pressure Turbine Stage for Two Stator-Rotor Axial Gaps—Part I: Three-Dimensional Time-Averaged Flow Field , 2007 .

[26]  Torsten Fransson,et al.  Effects of Multiblocking and Axial Gap Distance on Performance of Partial Admission Turbines: A Numerical Analysis , 2011 .

[27]  Reza S. Abhari,et al.  Influence of Vane-Blade Spacing on Transonic Turbine Stage Aerodynamics: Part II—Time-Resolved Data and Analysis , 1999 .

[28]  B. V. S. S. S. Prasad,et al.  Computational Investigation of Effect of Axial Spacing on Blade Row Interaction in a 1½ Stage Axial Flow Turbine , 2009 .

[29]  Jun-Young Park,et al.  Effects of Axial Gap on Unsteady Secondary Flow in One-Stage Axial Turbine , 2003 .

[30]  Vincenzo Dossena,et al.  Investigation of the Flow Field in a HP Turbine Stage for Two Stator-Rotor Axial Gaps: Part II — Unsteady Flow Field , 2006 .