Effects of carotid artery stenting on arterial geometry.

BACKGROUND The role of carotid artery stenting (CAS) for the treatment of carotid artery disease continues to evolve, despite higher stroke and restenosis risks for CAS compared with conventional open endarterectomy. Understanding the effects of CAS on arterial geometry, which strongly influence hemodynamics and wall mechanics, can assist in better stratifying the inherent risk of CAS to individual patients. STUDY DESIGN Fifteen consecutive patients undergoing CAS had pre- and post-stenting CT angiograms. These images were used to reconstruct the 3-dimensional geometries of the bilateral carotid arteries from their origin to the skull base. Quantitative assessment of the carotid bifurcation angle, cross-sectional area, tortuosity and artery length, were compared pre- and post-stenting. Plaque volume and calcification were also measured. Mathematical models were devised to determine the mechanisms of CAS-induced geometric changes, and their mechanical and hemodynamic significances. RESULTS Major and moderate changes in arterial tortuosity and elongation were seen in 5 (33%) patients. Characteristics most associated with the development of CAS-induced geometric changes were stenoses located in the internal carotid artery distal to the carotid bulb, circumferential distribution of plaque, and plaque calcification. Modeling did not demonstrate substantial alterations in wall shear stress due to geometric changes, but did show considerable increases in arterial wall axial stress. CONCLUSIONS Carotid artery stenting can produce geometric changes to the artery that promote favorable conditions for complications and recurrent disease. Patients with circumferential, highly calcified plaques that are located relatively distal in the internal carotid artery are most likely to have post-stenting geometric changes.

[1]  H. Lanfermann,et al.  Recanalization results after carotid stent placement. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  B. Rutt,et al.  Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: computational studies with models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  Peter L. Choyke,et al.  Patient-Specific Simulation of Carotid Artery Stenting Using Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2001, MICCAI.

[4]  I. Pipinos,et al.  Carotid Endarterectomy is Superior to Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting for Perioperative and Long-Term Results , 2011, Vascular and endovascular surgery.

[5]  A. Fox,et al.  How to measure carotid stenosis. , 1993, Radiology.

[6]  A. Kamenskiy,et al.  Hemodynamically Motivated Choice of Patch Angioplasty for the Performance of Carotid Endarterectomy , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  B. Lal,et al.  Patterns of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: classification and implications for long-term outcome. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  A. Toniato,et al.  A prospective randomized study on bilateral carotid endarterectomy: patching versus eversion. , 2000, Annals of surgery.

[9]  Jason N. MacTaggart,et al.  In vivo three-dimensional blood velocity profile shapes in the human common, internal, and external carotid arteries. , 2011, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  Michael D Hill,et al.  Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  R. Ogden,et al.  A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models , 2000 .

[12]  Chengpei Xu,et al.  Arterial enlargement, tortuosity, and intimal thickening in response to sequential exposure to high and low wall shear stress. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  R. Ross The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s , 1993, Nature.

[14]  C. Ross,et al.  Late outcomes of carotid artery stenting: a critical review. , 2011, The American surgeon.

[15]  A. Kamenskiy,et al.  Three-dimensional geometry of the human carotid artery. , 2012, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  E. Peterson,et al.  ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on carotid stenting. , 2007, Vascular medicine.

[17]  R M Lehman,et al.  Mechanism of enlargement of major cerebral collateral arteries in rabbits. , 1991, Stroke.

[18]  Barbara M. Johnston,et al.  Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: steady state simulations. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  A. Hughes,et al.  Influence of head position on carotid hemodynamics in young adults. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[20]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy: meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. , 2011, Archives of neurology.

[21]  A. Kamenskiy,et al.  Comparative analysis of the biaxial mechanical behavior of carotid wall tissue and biological and synthetic materials used for carotid patch angioplasty. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  E. Edelman,et al.  Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  G. New,et al.  Carotid artery stenting: technical considerations. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[24]  S. Alper,et al.  Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. , 1999, JAMA.

[25]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Fundamental role of axial stress in compensatory adaptations by arteries. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Gerhard A Holzapfel,et al.  Changes in the mechanical environment of stenotic arteries during interaction with stents: computational assessment of parametric stent designs. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  M. Epstein,et al.  Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs , 2002 .

[28]  L. Antiga,et al.  Inlet conditions for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation: is it reasonable to assume fully developed flow? , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[29]  M. Reidy,et al.  Mechanisms of stenosis after arterial injury. , 1983, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[30]  R. Berguer,et al.  Surgery of the Arteries to the Head , 1992, Springer New York.

[31]  P. Serruys,et al.  Evaluation of endothelial shear stress and 3D geometry as factors determining the development of atherosclerosis and remodeling in human coronary arteries in vivo. Combining 3D reconstruction from angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) with computational fluid dynamics. , 1997, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[32]  C. Kleinstreuer,et al.  Computational mechanics of Nitinol stent grafts. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  D. Ku,et al.  Pulsatile Flow in a Model Carotid Bifurcation , 1983, Arteriosclerosis.

[34]  A. AbuRahma,et al.  Prospective randomized trial of bilateral carotid endarterectomies: primary closure versus patching. , 1999, Stroke.

[35]  A. Kamenskiy,et al.  Nonlinear mechanical behavior of the human common, external, and internal carotid arteries in vivo. , 2012, The Journal of surgical research.

[36]  Michele Conti,et al.  Impact of Carotid Stent Cell Design on Vessel Scaffolding: A Case Study Comparing Experimental Investigation and Numerical Simulations , 2011, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[37]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Operator experience and carotid stenting outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries. , 2011, JAMA.