The effect of jaw position on measures of tongue strength and endurance.

Assessment of tongue strength and endurance is common in research and clinical contexts. It is unclear whether the results reveal discrete function by the tongue or combined abilities of the tongue and jaw. One way to isolate the movement of the tongue is to constrain the jaw kinematically by using a bite block. In this study, 10 neurologically normal young adults performed tongue strength and endurance tasks without a bite block ("jaw-free") and with bite blocks of various heights (2, 5, 10, and 15 mm for strength; 5 mm for endurance). Data signals included tongue pressure exerted on an air-filled bulb, surface electromyography (SEMG) from the superior tongue blade, and SEMG from 1 masseter. On average, tongue strength (pressure in kPa) was greatest with no bite block and generally decreased as bite blocks increased in height. Pairwise analyses revealed statistically significant differences for all but 3 comparisons (jaw-free to 2 mm, 2 to 5 mm, and 5 to 10 mm). After removing outlying data from 1 participant, tongue endurance at 50% of tongue strength was significantly greater without a bite block than with one. SEMG data did not differ significantly for the strength task across bite block conditions, but inspection of the individual data revealed a tendency for masseter activity to be lower when the jaw was unconstrained. These results suggest that maximal tongue strength and endurance are best assessed with an unconstrained mandible or with a very small bite block.

[1]  R. Wilhelms-Tricarico Physiological modeling of speech production: methods for modeling soft-tissue articulators. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  B. Murdoch,et al.  Impaired tongue strength and endurance in developmental verbal dyspraxia: a physiological analysis. , 1995, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[3]  R. Netsell Construction and use of a bite-block for the evaluation and treatment of speech disorders. , 1985, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[4]  S. Gandevia Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[5]  E. Luschei,et al.  Sustaining a constant effort by the tongue and hand: effects of acute fatigue. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  N H Edelman,et al.  Strength and endurance characteristics of the normal human genioglossus. , 1993, The American review of respiratory disease.

[7]  Cengizhan Ozturk,et al.  MODELLING THE INTERNAL TONGUE USING PRINCIPAL STRAINS , 2000 .

[8]  J A Daubenspeck,et al.  A noninvasive intraoral electromyographic electrode for genioglossus muscle. , 1985, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  W S Levine,et al.  Modeling the motion of the internal tongue from tagged cine-MRI images. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J. Folkins,et al.  Jaw-muscle activity during speech with the mandible fixed. , 1981, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  K. Honda Organization of tongue articulation for vowels , 1996 .

[12]  R. Baxendale,et al.  Fatigue and EMG changes in the masseter and temporalis muscles during sustained contractions. , 1993, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[13]  E. Luschei,et al.  Strength, endurance, and stability of the tongue and hand in Parkinson disease. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  V. Turjanmaa,et al.  Assessment of the reproducibility of strength and endurance handgrip parameters using a digital analyser , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[15]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Tongue strength and endurance: relation to highly skilled movements. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  N. Vøllestad Measurement of human muscle fatigue , 1997, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  B. Murdoch,et al.  Changes in Maximum Capacity Tongue Function following the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment Program , 2000 .

[18]  C. Moore Symmetry of mandibular muscle activity as an index of coordinative strategy. , 1993, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research.

[19]  E K Sauerland,et al.  Electromyographic activity of intrinsic and extrinsic muscles of the human tongue. , 1975, Texas reports on biology and medicine.

[20]  M. F. Palmer,et al.  A Study of Tongue Pressures of Speech Defective and Normal Speaking Individuals , 1940 .

[21]  O. Fujimura,et al.  Computation of mapping from muscular contraction patterns to formant patterns in vowel space , 1983 .

[22]  T. van Eijden,et al.  Electromyographic Heterogeneity in the Human Temporalis and Masseter Muscles during Static Biting, Open\ Close Excursions, and Chewing , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[23]  B. Murdoch,et al.  Lip function in subjects with upper motor neuron type dysarthria following cerebrovascular accidents. , 1995, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[24]  W. Evans,et al.  Muscle strength and fatigue during isokinetic exercise in individuals with multiple sclerosis. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  N. Solomon Changes in normal speech after fatiguing the tongue. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[26]  Kazuhiro Tsuga,et al.  A novel handy probe for tongue pressure measurement. , 2002, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[27]  F A Baragar,et al.  A model relating patterns of human jaw movement to biomechanical constraints. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  H. W. van der Glas,et al.  A comparison of jaw-opener and jaw-closer muscle activity in humans to overcome an external force counteracting jaw movement , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Reiner Wilhelms‐Tricarico,et al.  A biomechanical and physiologically –based vocal tract model and its control , 1996 .