Modeling the impacts of feed spacer geometry on reverse osmosis and nanofiltration processes

Maximizing mass transfer and minimizing hydraulic losses in spiral wound elements is critical for designing effective and efficient reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) processes. Herein we describe a multi-scale modeling approach, which links microscopic and macroscopic transport phenomena in spiral wound elements. Model simulations elucidate the impacts of feed spacer geometry on full-scale RO/NF system performance considering four representative water treatment scenarios: (1) RO membranes used to desalt ocean water, (2) low-pressure RO membranes used to desalt brackish water, (3) ultra-low pressure RO membranes used to purify wastewater, and (4) NF membranes used to soften a hard, fresh water. According to model simulations, feed spacer geometry had little impact on mass transfer; hence, engineering spacers to improve concentration polarization, trans-membrane osmotic pressure, or product water quality may prove difficult and yield limited benefits. In contrast, thinner filaments spread further apart significantly reduced hydraulic losses with negligible impacts to mass transfer. In addition, a few non-circular filament shapes produced even lower hydraulic losses, which might prove beneficial for RO/NF treatment of low salinity waters where hydraulic losses through spiral wound elements contribute significantly to the total process energy consumption. In high salinity waters, improved spacer designs may not significantly reduce energy consumption because hydraulic losses through spiral wound elements are relatively small.

[1]  V. Geraldes,et al.  Prediction of the concentration polarization in the nanofiltration/reverse osmosis of dilute multi-ionic solutions , 2007 .

[2]  M. D. Pinho,et al.  Mass transfer coefficient determination method for high-recovery pressure-driven membrane modules , 2006 .

[3]  Ashwani Kumar,et al.  Flow visualization through spacer filled channels by computational fluid dynamics-II: improved feed spacer designs☆ , 2005 .

[4]  Sandeep K. Karode,et al.  Flow visualization through spacer filled channels by computational fluid dynamics I. , 2001 .

[5]  S. Bhattacharjee,et al.  A Model of Membrane Fouling by Salt Precipitation from Multicomponent Ionic Mixtures in Crossflow Nanofiltration , 2002 .

[6]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Techniques for computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow in membrane channels , 2003 .

[7]  Lianfa Song,et al.  Concentration polarization in cross-flow reverse osmosis , 1999 .

[8]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[9]  Robert Rautenbach,et al.  Separation potential of nanofiltration membranes , 1990 .

[10]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Vassilis Gekas,et al.  Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow , 1987 .

[12]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of Crossflow Membrane Filter Geometry and Shear Rate on Colloidal Fouling in Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Separations , 2002 .

[13]  J.L.C. Santos,et al.  Investigation of flow patterns and mass transfer in membrane module channels filled with flow-aligned spacers using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) , 2007 .

[14]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  A novel RO ex situ scale observation detector (EXSOD) for mineral scale characterization and early detection , 2007 .

[15]  G. Schock,et al.  Mass transfer and pressure loss in spiral wound modules , 1987 .

[16]  Lianfa Song,et al.  Simulations of Full-Scale Reverse Osmosis Membrane Process , 2002 .

[17]  S. Ergun Fluid flow through packed columns , 1952 .

[18]  S. Chellam,et al.  Scale-up methodology for municipal water nanofiltration based on permeate water quality , 2002 .

[19]  Eva Sorensen,et al.  A general approach to modelling membrane modules , 2003 .

[20]  J Baeyens,et al.  Modeling and scaleup of reverse osmosis separation , 2002 .

[21]  Eric M.V. Hoek,et al.  Modeling the effects of fouling on full-scale reverse osmosis processes , 2008 .

[22]  G. Hardy,et al.  Collected Papers of Srinivasa Ramanujan , 2000 .

[23]  Robert C. Cheng,et al.  Bench-Scale Testing of Nanofiltration for Seawater Desalination , 2007 .

[24]  Richard L. Stover,et al.  Seawater reverse osmosis with isobaric energy recovery devices , 2007 .

[25]  Robert Y. Ning,et al.  Colloidal fouling of RO membranes following MF/UF in the reclamation of municipal wastewater , 2007 .

[26]  Eric M.V. Hoek,et al.  Modeling concentration polarization in reverse osmosis processes , 2005 .

[27]  Eric M.V. Hoek,et al.  Pressure, flow, and concentration profiles in open and spacer-filled membrane channels , 2006 .

[28]  Jie Bao,et al.  CFD modelling of reverse osmosis membrane flow and validation with experimental results , 2007 .

[29]  M. Hafsi,et al.  Novel approach combining physico-chemical characterizations and mass transfer modelling of nanofiltration and low pressure reverse osmosis membranes for brackish water desalination intensification , 2008 .

[30]  H. Matsuyama,et al.  High recovery system in seawater reverse osmosis plants , 2008 .

[31]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Evaluation of crossflow filtration models based on shear-induced diffusion and particle adhesion: Complications induced by feed suspension polydispersivity , 1998 .

[32]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  CFD simulations of net-type turbulence promoters in a narrow channel , 2001 .

[33]  Noel De Nevers Fluid mechanics for chemical engineers , 1980 .

[34]  Viriato Semiao,et al.  Flow management in nanofiltration spiral wound modules with ladder-type spacers , 2002 .