Visual Information Processing From Multiple Displays

Objective: In this study, we examined how effectively people can monitor new stimuli on a peripheral display while carrying out judgments on an adjacent central display. Background: Improved situation awareness is critical for improved operator performance in aviation and many other domains. Given the limited extent of foveal processing, acquiring additional information from peripheral vision offers high potential gains. Method: Participants carried out a sequence of central perceptual judgments while simultaneously monitoring the periphery for new stimuli. Peripheral detection was measured as a function of central-judgment difficulty, the relative timing of the two tasks, and peripheral event rate. Results: Participants accurately detected and located peripheral targets, even at the highest eccentricity explored here (~30°). Peripheral detection was not reduced by increased central-task difficulty but was reduced when peripheral targets arrived later in the processing of central stimuli and when peripheral events were relatively rare. Conclusion: Under favorable conditions—high-contrast stimuli and high event rate—people can successfully monitor peripheral displays for new events while carrying out an unrelated continuous task on an adjacent display. Application: In many fields, such as aviation, existing displays were designed with low-contrast stimuli that provide little opportunity for peripheral vision. With appropriate redesign, operators might successfully monitor multiple displays over a large visual field. Designers need to be aware of nonvisual factors, such as low event rate and relative event timing, that can lead to failures to detect peripheral stimuli.

[1]  Jarvis J. Arthur,et al.  Flight Test Evaluation of Situation Awareness Benefits of Integrated Synthetic Vision System Technology f or Commercial Aircraft , 2005 .

[2]  Thomas K. Ferris,et al.  Using Informative Peripheral Visual and Tactile Cues to Support Task and Interruption Management , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[3]  H. Pashler,et al.  Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  E. Ruthruff,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Visual Cognition Controlling Spatial Attention without Central Attentional Resources: Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2022 .

[5]  Vernol Battiste,et al.  Development and Integration of a Human-Centered Volumetric Cockpit Situation Display for Distributed Air-Ground Operations , 2005 .

[6]  T. Smith,et al.  The C.I.E. colorimetric standards and their use , 1931 .

[7]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Theoretical Underpinnings of Situation Awareness, A Critical Review , 2000 .

[8]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[9]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[10]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  26.5 brief comms NEW , 2005 .

[11]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Why Pilots Miss the Green Box: How Display Context Undermines Attention Capture , 2004 .

[12]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Benoit Brisson,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of central interference in the control of visuospatial attention , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[15]  V. Lamme Why visual attention and awareness are different , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  N. Sarter,et al.  Capturing the dynamics of attention control from individual to distributed systems: the shape of models to come , 2010 .

[18]  郁夫 藤村,et al.  色対比と Color Appearance , 1970 .

[19]  Gerard J. Fogarty 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology , 2003 .

[20]  S. Yantis Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Edward J. Rinalducci,et al.  Further Experiments on the Effects of Foveal Load on Peripheral Vision , 1989 .

[24]  D. Jameson,et al.  The perception of brightness and darkness , 1970 .

[25]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  A J Courtney,et al.  Effects of Cognitive Foveal Load on a Peripheral Single-Target Detection Task , 1993, Perceptual and motor skills.

[28]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Attentional Limitations in Doing Two Tasks at Once , 2006 .

[29]  Daniel J. Garland,et al.  Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement , 2009 .

[30]  Robert L. Mason,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 2003 .

[31]  Roger W. Remington,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for two Types of Attention , 1995 .

[32]  J. Swets Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .