Robust Ranking of Universities Evaluated by Hierarchical and Interacting Criteria

In this chapter, we present a methodology of decision aiding that helps to build a ranking of a finite set of alternatives evaluated by a family of hierarchically structured criteria. The presentation has a tutorial character, and takes as an example the ranking of universities. Each university is generally evaluated on several aspects, such as quality of faculty and research output. Moreover, their performance on these macro-criteria can be further detailed by evaluation on some subcriteria. To take into account the hierarchical structure of criteria presented as a tree, the multiple criteria hierarchy process will be applied. The aggregation of the university performances will be done by the Choquet integral preference model that is able to take into account the possible negative and positive interactions between the criteria at hand. On the basis of an indirect preference information supplied by the decision maker in terms of pairwise comparisons of some universities, or comparison of some criteria in terms of their importance and their interaction, the robust ordinal regression and the stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis will be used. They will provide the decision maker some robust recommendations presented in the form of necessary and possible preference relations between universities, and in the form of a distribution of possible rank positions got by each of them, taking into account all preference models compatible with the available preference information. The methodology will be presented step by step on a sample of some European universities.

[1]  Gökçen Arkalı Olcay,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible ? : A review of university rankings , 2016 .

[2]  Joanicjusz Nazarko,et al.  Application of DEA method in efficiency evaluation of public higher education institutions , 2014 .

[3]  J. March Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[4]  Marc Meredith,et al.  Why Do Universities Compete in the Ratings Game? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of the U.S. News and World Report College Rankings , 2004 .

[5]  Peter P. Wakker,et al.  Additive Representations of Preferences , 1989 .

[6]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  A critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings , 2016, Scientometrics.

[7]  M. Grabisch The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making , 1996 .

[8]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Playing the ranking game: media coverage of the evaluation of the quality of research in Italy , 2017 .

[9]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Jean-Charles Billaut,et al.  Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? , 2010, Scientometrics.

[11]  Selim Zaim,et al.  Measuring the relative efficiency of quality management practices in Turkish public and private universities , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  T. Rosenmayer,et al.  Using Data Envelopment Analysis: A Case of Universities , 2014 .

[13]  George Katharakis,et al.  A Comparative Assessment of Greek Universities' Efficiency Using Quantitative Analysis. , 2010 .

[14]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Jacek Pietrucha,et al.  Country-specific determinants of world university rankings , 2017, Scientometrics.

[16]  G. Rota On the foundations of combinatorial theory I. Theory of Möbius Functions , 1964 .

[17]  Veljko Jeremic,et al.  How does the normalization of data affect the ARWU ranking? , 2012, Scientometrics.

[18]  Nian Cai Liu,et al.  The Academic Ranking of World Universities. , 2005 .

[19]  S. Greco,et al.  Robust Ordinal Regression and Stochastic Multiobjective Acceptability Analysis in multiple criteria hierarchy process for the Choquet integral preference model , 2016 .

[20]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  K-order Additive Discrete Fuzzy Measures and Their Representation , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[21]  Simon Marginson,et al.  University Rankings and Social Science , 2014 .

[22]  Shingo Aoki,et al.  Data envelopment analysis for evaluating Japanese universities , 2010, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[23]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  A Web-based decision support system with ELECTRE III for a personalised ranking of British universities , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  Prométhée: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis , 1984 .

[26]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  SMAA - Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[28]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Evaluating the performance of academic departments: an analysis of research-related output efficiency , 2012 .

[29]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  D. Aigner,et al.  P. Schmidt, 1977,?Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,? , 1977 .

[31]  Dongbin Kim The Effect of Financial Aid on Students' College Choice: Differences by Racial Groups , 2004 .

[32]  Tommi Tervonen,et al.  Hit-And-Run enables efficient weight generation for simulation-based multiple criteria decision analysis , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Tindaro Cicero,et al.  A field-standardized application of DEA to national-scale research assessment of universities , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[34]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process in Robust Ordinal Regression , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  Gualberto Buela-Casal,et al.  Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities , 2007, Scientometrics.

[36]  Konstantinos Kounetas,et al.  Departmental efficiency differences within a Greek university: An application of a DEA and Tobit analysis , 2011, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[37]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2016 .

[38]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[39]  Kaycheng Soh,et al.  The seven deadly sins of world university ranking: a summary from several papers , 2017 .

[40]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  A. Usher,et al.  A Global Survey of University Ranking and League Tables , 2007 .

[42]  Milosz Kadzinski,et al.  Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking , 2013, Machine Learning.

[43]  J. Figueira,et al.  A survey on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis methods , 2008 .

[44]  Robert C. Serow,et al.  Research and teaching at a research university , 2000 .

[45]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[46]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Robust ordinal regression for value functions handling interacting criteria , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[47]  Jean-Luc Marichal,et al.  Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[48]  L. Shapley A Value for n-person Games , 1988 .

[49]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[50]  Veljko Jeremic,et al.  A fresh approach to evaluating the academic ranking of world universities , 2011, Scientometrics.

[51]  G. Kempkes,et al.  The efficiency of German universities–some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods , 2010 .

[52]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Efficient Monte Carlo Procedures for Generating Points Uniformly Distributed over Bounded Regions , 1984, Oper. Res..

[53]  Razvan V. Florian,et al.  Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities , 2007, Scientometrics.

[54]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[55]  Stephen C. Gara,et al.  Efficiency-Based Funding for Public Four-Year Colleges and Universities , 2012, Education Finance and Policy.

[56]  J. Chavas,et al.  Analysis and decomposition of scope economies: R&D at US research universities , 2012 .

[57]  Paolo Landoni,et al.  Evaluating the Efficiency of Research in Academic Departments: an Empirical Analysis in an Italian Region , 2011 .

[58]  S. Greco,et al.  Necessary and possible preference structures , 2013 .

[59]  K. Tochkov,et al.  University efficiency and public funding for higher education in Bulgaria , 2012 .

[60]  Geraint Johnes,et al.  Efficiency in English higher education institutions revisited: a network approach , 2013 .

[61]  S. Greco,et al.  Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non-additive robust ordinal regression ☆ , 2016 .

[62]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  Visual management of performance with PROMETHEE productivity analysis , 2018, Soft Comput..

[63]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[64]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications , 2011 .

[65]  Kaycheng Soh,et al.  What the Overall doesn’t tell about world university rankings: examples from ARWU, QSWUR, and THEWUR in 2013 , 2015 .

[66]  S. Greco,et al.  A robust ranking method extending ELECTRE III to hierarchy of interacting criteria, imprecise weights and stochastic analysis , 2017 .

[67]  Yannis Siskos,et al.  Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[68]  G. Choquet Theory of capacities , 1954 .

[69]  P. Wakker Additive Representations of Preferences: A New Foundation of Decision Analysis , 1988 .

[70]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[71]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[72]  Roman Słowiński,et al.  Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method , 2013 .

[73]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  An Overview of ELECTRE Methods and their Recent Extensions , 2013 .

[74]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.