Detecting and analysing intraspecific genetic variation with eDNA: From population genetics to species abundance

Advancements in environmental DNA (eDNA) approaches have allowed for rapid and efficient species detections in diverse environments. Although most eDNA research is focused on leveraging genetic diversity to identify taxa, some recent studies have explored the potential for these approaches to detect within-species genetic variation, allowing for population genetic assessments and abundance estimates from environmental samples. However, we currently lack a framework outlining the key considerations specific to generating, analysing and applying eDNA data for these two purposes. Here, we discuss how various genetic markers differ with regard to genetic information and detectability in environmental samples and how analysis of eDNA samples differs from common tissue-based analyses. We then outline how it may be possible to obtain species absolute abundance estimates from eDNA by detecting intraspecific genetic variation in mixtures of DNA under multiple scenarios. We also identify the major causes contributing to allele detection and frequency errors in eDNA data, discuss their consequences for population-level analyses and outline bioinformatic approaches to detect and remove erroneous sequences. This review summarizes the key advances required to harness the full potential of eDNA-based intraspecific genetic variation to inform population-level questions in ecology, evolutionary biology and conservation management.

[1]  D. Heath,et al.  Interspecific allometric scaling in eDNA production among northwestern Atlantic bony fishes reflects physiological allometric scaling , 2022, Environmental DNA.

[2]  D. Lodge.  Policy action needed to unlock eDNA potential , 2022, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[3]  Jindong Zhao,et al.  Fishing for fish environmental DNA: Ecological applications, methodological considerations, surveying designs, and ways forward , 2022, Molecular ecology.

[4]  Zachary J Gold,et al.  Toward quantitative metabarcoding , 2022, bioRxiv.

[5]  David J. Duffy,et al.  Detection and population genomics of sea turtle species via non-invasive environmental DNA analysis of nesting beach sand tracks and oceanic water. , 2022, Molecular ecology resources.

[6]  D. Chu,et al.  Environmental DNA provides quantitative estimates of Pacific hake abundance and distribution in the open ocean , 2022, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[7]  M. Meekan,et al.  Individual haplotyping of whale sharks from seawater environmental DNA , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.

[8]  S. Watabe,et al.  Estimation of tuna population by the improved analytical pipeline of unique molecular identifier-assisted HaCeD-Seq (haplotype count from eDNA) , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[9]  J. Adolf,et al.  Trawl and eDNA assessment of marine fish diversity, seasonality, and relative abundance in coastal New Jersey, USA  , 2021 .

[10]  Owen S. Wangensteen,et al.  To denoise or to cluster, that is not the question: optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeography , 2021, BMC Bioinform..

[11]  V. Savolainen,et al.  Meta‐analysis shows that environmental DNA outperforms traditional surveys, but warrants better reporting standards , 2021, Ecology and evolution.

[12]  S. Palumbi,et al.  Testing small‐scale ecological gradients and intraspecific differentiation for hundreds of kelp forest species using haplotypes from metabarcoding , 2021, Molecular ecology.

[13]  S. Domisch,et al.  Improving the reliability of eDNA data interpretation , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.

[14]  T. Garcia,et al.  Estimating the genetic diversity of Pacific salmon and trout using multigene eDNA metabarcoding , 2021, Molecular ecology.

[15]  D. Lodge,et al.  Nuclear eDNA estimates population allele frequencies and abundance in experimental mesocosms and field samples , 2021, Molecular ecology.

[16]  J. Teilmann,et al.  Environmental DNA captures the genetic diversity of bowhead whales ( Balaena mysticetus ) in West Greenland , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[17]  A. Manica,et al.  Genome‐scale target capture of mitochondrial and nuclear environmental DNA from water samples , 2020, Molecular ecology resources.

[18]  S. Foster,et al.  Population differentiation from environmental DNA: Investigating the potential of haplotype presence/absence‐based analysis of molecular variance , 2020 .

[19]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Pathway to Increase Standards and Competency of eDNA Surveys (PISCeS)—Advancing collaboration and standardization efforts in the field of eDNA , 2020 .

[20]  Masayuki Ushio,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of intraspecific genetic diversity in a natural fish population using environmental DNA analysis , 2020, Molecular ecology resources.

[21]  R. Duncan,et al.  Identifying error and accurately interpreting environmental DNA metabarcoding results: A case study to detect vertebrates at arid zone waterholes , 2020, Molecular ecology resources.

[22]  Richard T. Corlett,et al.  Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects , 2020, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[23]  T. Minamoto,et al.  Estimating shedding and decay rates of environmental nuclear DNA with relation to water temperature and biomass , 2020, Environmental DNA.

[24]  S. Bogdanowicz,et al.  Unraveling hierarchical genetic structure in a marine metapopulation: A comparison of three high‐throughput genotyping approaches , 2020, Molecular ecology.

[25]  Md. Shaheed Reza,et al.  HaCeD-Seq: a Novel Method for Reliable and Easy Estimation About the Fish Population Using Haplotype Count from eDNA , 2019, Marine Biotechnology.

[26]  M. M. Hansen,et al.  Population‐level inferences from environmental DNA—Current status and future perspectives , 2019, Evolutionary applications.

[27]  Kazuyuki Saito,et al.  Estimation of the number of contributors to mixed samples of DNA by mitochondrial DNA analyses using massively parallel sequencing , 2019, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[28]  Masayuki Ushio,et al.  Environmental DNA analysis shows high potential as a tool for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in a wild fish population , 2019, bioRxiv.

[29]  F. Samarra,et al.  False‐negative detections from environmental DNA collected in the presence of large numbers of killer whales ( Orcinus orca ) , 2019, Environmental DNA.

[30]  G. Luikart,et al.  Improved detection of rare, endangered and invasive trout in using a new large‐volume sampling method for eDNA capture , 2019, Environmental DNA.

[31]  G. Carvalho,et al.  Environmental DNA size sorting and degradation experiment indicates the state of Daphnia magna mitochondrial and nuclear eDNA is subcellular , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[32]  T. Minamoto,et al.  Particle size distribution of environmental DNA from the nuclei of marine fish. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  A. Antich,et al.  From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff , 2019, bioRxiv.

[34]  D. Fraser,et al.  Meta‐analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species‐specific abundance in nature , 2019, Environmental DNA.

[35]  D. Berner.  Allele Frequency Difference AFD–An Intuitive Alternative to FST for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation , 2019, Genes.

[36]  Carol A. Stepien,et al.  Invasion genetics of the silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix across North America: Differentiation of fronts, introgression, and eDNA metabarcode detection , 2019, PloS one.

[37]  Carol A. Stepien,et al.  Invasion genetics from eDNA and thousands of larvae: A targeted metabarcoding assay that distinguishes species and population variation of zebra and quagga mussels , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[38]  N. Gemmell,et al.  Beyond Biodiversity: Can Environmental DNA (eDNA) Cut It as a Population Genetics Tool? , 2019, Genes.

[39]  Md Saydur Rahman,et al.  Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA , 2019, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[40]  K. McKelvey,et al.  An improved environmental DNA assay for bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) based on the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer I , 2018, PloS one.

[41]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Estimating species distribution and abundance in river networks using environmental DNA , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  F. Nakajima,et al.  A Microcosm Study of Surface Sediment Environmental DNA: Decay Observation, Abundance Estimation, and Fragment Length Comparison. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  J. Krause,et al.  Ratio of mitochondrial to nuclear DNA affects contamination estimates in ancient DNA analysis , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[44]  K. McKelvey,et al.  Capture enrichment of aquatic environmental DNA: A first proof of concept , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.

[45]  M. Everett,et al.  Water, water everywhere: environmental DNA can unlock population structure in elusive marine species , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[46]  C. Hardy,et al.  Does Size Matter? An Experimental Evaluation of the Relative Abundance and Decay Rates of Aquatic Environmental DNA. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[47]  Holger Klinck,et al.  Environmental DNA (eDNA) From the Wake of the Whales: Droplet Digital PCR for Detection and Species Identification , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[48]  D. Lodge,et al.  Environmental DNA detection of aquatic invasive plants in lab mesocosm and natural field conditions , 2018, Biological Invasions.

[49]  M. Gautier,et al.  Measuring Genetic Differentiation from Pool-seq Data , 2018, Genetics.

[50]  E. Anderson,et al.  Microhaplotypes provide increased power from short‐read DNA sequences for relationship inference , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.

[51]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[52]  E. Harvey,et al.  Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA: metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[53]  H. Doi,et al.  Distinct seasonal migration patterns of Japanese native and non‐native genotypes of common carp estimated by environmental DNA , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[54]  V. Savolainen,et al.  Behavior and season affect crayfish detection and density inference using environmental DNA , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[55]  P. Taberlet,et al.  High‐throughput microsatellite genotyping in ecology: improved accuracy, efficiency, standardization and success with low‐quantity and degraded DNA , 2017, Molecular ecology resources.

[56]  W. Jeffery,et al.  Environmental DNA in subterranean biology: range extension and taxonomic implications for Proteus , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[57]  H. Doi,et al.  Nuclear internal transcribed spacer‐1 as a sensitive genetic marker for environmental DNA studies in common carp Cyprinus carpio , 2017, Molecular ecology resources.

[58]  L. Orlando,et al.  Population characteristics of a large whale shark aggregation inferred from seawater environmental DNA , 2016, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[59]  Xavier Pochon,et al.  Targeted gene enrichment and high‐throughput sequencing for environmental biomonitoring: a case study using freshwater macroinvertebrates , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[60]  L. W. Cole.  The Evolution of Per-cell Organelle Number , 2016, Front. Cell Dev. Biol..

[61]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Quantifying relative fish abundance with eDNA: a promising tool for fisheries management , 2016 .

[62]  A. Kinziger,et al.  Using occupancy modelling to compare environmental DNA to traditional field methods for regional‐scale monitoring of an endangered aquatic species , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[63]  Paul J. McMurdie,et al.  DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data , 2016, Nature Methods.

[64]  M. P. Piggott.  Evaluating the effects of laboratory protocols on eDNA detection probability for an endangered freshwater fish , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[65]  H. Doi,et al.  A novel environmental DNA approach to quantify the cryptic invasion of non‐native genotypes , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[66]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Next‐generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding , 2016, Molecular ecology.

[67]  Kristine Bohmann,et al.  Tag jumps illuminated – reducing sequence‐to‐sample misidentifications in metabarcoding studies , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[68]  Muriel Medard,et al.  NOCIt: a computational method to infer the number of contributors to DNA samples analyzed by STR genotyping. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[69]  D. Chapman,et al.  Quantification of eDNA shedding rates from invasive bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis and silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix. , 2015 .

[70]  C. Goldberg,et al.  Quantifying effects of UV-B, temperature, and pH on eDNA degradation in aquatic microcosms , 2015 .

[71]  M. Kondoh,et al.  The Release Rate of Environmental DNA from Juvenile and Adult Fish , 2014, PloS one.

[72]  T. Johnson,et al.  Novel molecular approach demonstrates that turbid river plumes reduce predation mortality on larval fish , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[73]  K. Kidd,et al.  Current sequencing technology makes microhaplotypes a powerful new type of genetic marker for forensics. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[74]  T. Cezard,et al.  Estimation of population allele frequencies from next‐generation sequencing data: pool‐versus individual‐based genotyping , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[75]  Robert S. Arkle,et al.  Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples , 2013 .

[76]  Z. Olson,et al.  An eDNA approach to detect eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus a. alleganiensis) using samples of water , 2012, Wildlife Research.

[77]  Satoshi Yamamoto,et al.  High-Coverage ITS Primers for the DNA-Based Identification of Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes in Environmental Samples , 2012, PloS one.

[78]  Robert Kofler,et al.  PoPoolation2: identifying differentiation between populations using sequencing of pooled DNA samples (Pool-Seq) , 2011, Bioinform..

[79]  Hinda Haned,et al.  Estimating the Number of Contributors to Forensic DNA Mixtures: Does Maximum Likelihood Perform Better Than Maximum Allele Count? , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[80]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples , 2008, Biology Letters.

[81]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium — understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[82]  P. Hebert,et al.  bold: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org) , 2007, Molecular ecology notes.

[83]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[84]  Carissa M Krane,et al.  Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[85]  T. Egeland,et al.  Estimating the number of contributors to a DNA profile , 2003, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[86]  Jeremy R. deWaard,et al.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[87]  M. Chandler,et al.  Evolution of the ribosomal RNA internal transcribed spacer one (ITS-1) in cichlid fishes of the Lake Victoria region. , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[88]  P Taberlet,et al.  Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[89]  E. Robin,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA molecules and virtual number of mitochondria per cell in mammalian cells , 1988, Journal of cellular physiology.

[90]  M S Waterman,et al.  Identification of common molecular subsequences. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[91]  I B Dawid,et al.  Repeated genes in eukaryotes. , 1980, Annual review of biochemistry.

[92]  S. Manel,et al.  Evaluating bioinformatics pipelines for population- level inference using environmental DNA , 2021 .

[93]  Masayuki Ushio,et al.  Evaluating intraspecific genetic diversity using environmental DNA and denoising approach: A case study using tank water , 2019, Environmental DNA.

[94]  H. Doi,et al.  Environmental DNA analysis for estimating the abundance and biomass of stream fish , 2017 .

[95]  B. Baldigo,et al.  Efficacy of Environmental DNA to Detect and Quantify Brook Trout Populations in Headwater Streams of the Adirondack Mountains, New York , 2017 .

[96]  Michael L. Raymer,et al.  Inferring the Number of Contributors to Mixed DNA Profiles , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[97]  Chenuil Anne.  Choosing the right molecular genetic markers for studying biodiversity: from molecular evolution to practical aspects , 2005, Genetica.

[98]  Craig R. Miller,et al.  Assessing allelic dropout and genotype reliability using maximum likelihood. , 2002, Genetics.