Data mining to aid beam angle selection for intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Research on the beam angle optimization problem for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has focused on developing optimization approaches to obtain a single high-quality angle set for each patient. In this paper, we propose a population-based method to aid the beam angle selection process with the goal of significantly improving the efficiency of the process while identifying high-quality angle sets. We use a database of approximately 2,700 IMRT treatment plans for 10 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer to train three data mining techniques (linear regression, neural networks, and k-nearest neighbor) to rank treatment plans based on potential quality. Using 5-fold cross-validation, we train our models to rank a list of 54 new beam angle plans (for a total of 50 lists) and then fully evaluate a set of the most promising plans. Our models can, choosing only three plans out of 54, correctly identify at least one of the top three plans up to 76% of the time. Furthermore, 34% of the time we find the top plan. By sorting the plans prior to full evaluation, we are able to find the better plans faster.

[1]  Ping Xia,et al.  Simplifying intensity‐modulated radiotherapy plans with fewer beam angles for the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma , 2007, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[2]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Iterative solution methods for beam angle and fluence map optimization in intensity modulated radiation therapy planning , 2008, OR Spectr..

[3]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Similarities between static and rotational intensity-modulated plans. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  C. Burman,et al.  Treatment Planning Considerations Using IMRT , 2003 .

[5]  C C Ling,et al.  When becometh less more? , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  S L Hancock,et al.  Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Beam's eye view volumetrics: an aid in rapid treatment plan development and evaluation. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Y. Li,et al.  Automatic beam angle selection in IMRT planning using genetic algorithm. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Number and orientations of beams in intensity-modulated radiation treatments. , 1997, Medical physics.

[10]  A Pugachev,et al.  Computer-assisted selection of coplanar beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Gino J. Lim,et al.  Radiation therapy beam angle optimization methods: A comparison study , 2012 .

[12]  L. Xing,et al.  Pseudo beam's-eye-view as applied to beam orientation selection in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Behlul Saka,et al.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy with field rotation—a time-varying fractionation study , 2012, Health Care Management Science.

[14]  D. Kibler,et al.  Instance-based learning algorithms , 2004, Machine Learning.

[15]  H. Romeijn,et al.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment plan optimization , 2008 .

[16]  S. Webb The physical basis of IMRT and inverse planning. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  D. Craft Local beam angle optimization with linear programming and gradient search , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Wei Liu,et al.  Uncertainty incorporated beam angle optimization for IMPT treatment planning. , 2012, Medical physics.

[19]  Valentina Cacchiani,et al.  A hybrid approach to beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy , 2013, Comput. Oper. Res..

[20]  C G Rowbottom,et al.  Beam-orientation customization using an artificial neural network. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  H. Edwin Romeijn,et al.  A Response Surface Approach to Beam Orientation Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning , 2009, INFORMS J. Comput..

[22]  Ahmad-Saher Azizi-Sultan Automatic Selection of Beam Orientations in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy , 2010, Electron. Notes Discret. Math..

[23]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  Spherical cluster analysis for beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Sumit Basu,et al.  An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors , 2012, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[25]  Leyuan Shi,et al.  A nested partitions framework for beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[27]  Eva K. Lee,et al.  Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  T. Bortfeld IMRT: a review and preview , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  M. Goitein,et al.  Multi-dimensional treatment planning: II. Beam's eye-view, back projection, and projection through CT sections. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  Leyuan Shi,et al.  Selection of beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy using single-beam indices and integer programming. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Jianrong Dai,et al.  Optimization of beam orientations and beam weights for conformal radiotherapy using mixed integer programming. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Beam angle optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of non-small-cell lung cancers. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  C G Rowbottom,et al.  Improvements in prostate radiotherapy from the customization of beam directions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[34]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Optimization of beam orientations in radiation therapy: some theoretical considerations. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  L. Xing,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary optimization of the number of beams, their orientations and weights for intensity-modulated radiation therapy , 2004, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[36]  Dionne M. Aleman,et al.  Neighborhood search approaches to non-coplanar beam orientation optimization for total marrow irradiation using IMRT , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Arvind Kumar,et al.  Neighborhood search approaches to beam orientation optimization in intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning , 2008, J. Glob. Optim..

[38]  Gino J. Lim,et al.  A two-phase method for selecting IMRT treatment beam angles: Branch-and-Prune and local neighborhood search , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Boyd M C McCurdy,et al.  A simple geometric algorithm to predict optimal starting gantry angles using equiangular-spaced beams for intensity modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer. , 2007, Medical physics.

[40]  B. Murray,et al.  The development of target-eye-view maps for selection of coplanar or noncoplanar beams in conformal radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1999, Medical physics.

[41]  Jonathan Goldstein,et al.  When Is ''Nearest Neighbor'' Meaningful? , 1999, ICDT.

[42]  L. Xing,et al.  Incorporating prior knowledge into beam orientation optimization in IMRT. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[43]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[44]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[45]  A. Brahme,et al.  Which is the most suitable number of photon beam portals in coplanar radiation therapy? , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.