Information system integration, enabling control and performance

The literature has demonstrated the complex relationship between information system integration approaches, such as Enterprise Resource Planning systems, and management control. In this paper, we begin our analysis by focussing on just one aspect of information system integration, namely in terms of data architecture, commonly referred to as the single database concept. We argue that whilst this particular aspect of integration should be related to perceived system success, the variety of ways in which information might be drawn on in practice means it provides no strong basis for predicting a link to business unit performance. Instead, building on Adler and Borys [Adler, P., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61-90] we argue that the level of information system integration fosters the four design characteristics that make up an enabling approach to management control. Each of these in turn is related to both perceived system success and business unit performance. We present PLS analysis of survey data collected from 169 managers that broadly supports these expectations.

[1]  Sue Newell,et al.  Implementing enterprise resource planning and knowledge management systems in tandem: fostering efficiency and innovation complementarity , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[2]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[3]  Robert A. Simons.  The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives☆ , 1990 .

[4]  Trevor Hopper,et al.  A 'time' space odyssey': Management control systems in two multinational organisations , 2005 .

[5]  Christopher S. Chapman,et al.  Not because they are new: Developing the contribution of enterprise resource planning systems to management control research , 2005 .

[6]  Thomas Ahrens,et al.  Accounting for Flexibility and Efficiency: A Field Study of Management Control Systems in a Restaurant Chain , 2004 .

[7]  D. Otley,et al.  Practice Developments in Budgeting: An Overview and Research Perspective , 2003 .

[8]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Budgeting Research: Three Theoretical Perspectives and Criteria for Selective Integration , 2003 .

[9]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  Strategy, Control Systems, and Resource Sharing: Effects on Business-Unit Performance , 1990 .

[10]  R. Chenhall,et al.  Organic decision and communication processes and management accounting systems in entrepreneurial and conservative business organizations , 1995 .

[11]  C. Ciborra,et al.  Formative contexts and information technology: Understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations , 1994 .

[12]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[13]  A. P. Chan,et al.  Coordination and Virtualization: the Role of Electronic Networks and Personal Relationships , 1999 .

[14]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[15]  Jinyoul Lee,et al.  An ERP implementation case study from a knowledge transfer perspective , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Michael D. Shields.  Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990s , 1997 .

[17]  Lili-Anne Kihn,et al.  Comparing Performance Measurement Approaches in Accounting Research , 2008 .

[18]  Matthew D. Hall,et al.  The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance , 2008 .

[19]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[20]  V. Govindarajan.  Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: An empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable☆ , 1984 .

[21]  Ramez Elmasri,et al.  Fundamentals of Database Systems , 1989 .

[22]  C. S. Chapman,et al.  Accountants in organisational networks , 1998 .

[23]  J. Kallinikos.  Farewell to constructivism: technology and context-embedded action , 2004 .

[24]  Bo-Göran Ekholm,et al.  Is the annual budget really dead? , 2000 .

[25]  Margaret A. Abernethy,et al.  The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: an exploratory study , 1999 .

[26]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[27]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach , 1998 .

[28]  Herman Wold,et al.  Model Construction and Evaluation When Theoretical Knowledge Is Scarce , 1980 .

[29]  Theo Vurdubakis,et al.  Information technology as organization/disorganization , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[30]  R. Hoyle.  Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research , 1999 .

[31]  Jacqueline L. Reck,et al.  Enterprise resource planning systems: comparing firm performance of adopters and nonadopters , 2003, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[32]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[33]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[34]  Trevor Hopper,et al.  What does organizational change mean?: Speculations on a taken for granted category , 2001 .

[35]  T. Davenport.  Competing on analytics. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[36]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The order of technology: Complexity and control in a connected world , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[37]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[38]  Taylor Randall,et al.  Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms , 2003 .

[39]  Ariela Caglio,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning systems and accountants: towards hybridization? , 2003 .

[40]  James B. Ramsey,et al.  Evaluation of Econometric Models , 1980 .

[41]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[42]  Robin S. Poston,et al.  Financial impacts of enterprise resource planning implementations , 2001, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[45]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Virtual organization: toward a theory of societal transformation stimulated by information technology , 2003, UBIQ.

[46]  Richard Sotto,et al.  The virtual organisation , 1997 .

[47]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[48]  Alnoor Bhimani,et al.  Management Accounting in the Digital Economy , 2003 .

[49]  Kim Langfield-Smith,et al.  Structural equation modeling in management accounting research: critical analysis and opportunities , 2004 .

[50]  J. Barney,et al.  The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 , 2001 .

[51]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Antecedents of participative budgeting , 1998 .

[52]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  Moderate impact of ERPS on management accounting: a lag or permanent outcome? , 2002 .

[53]  Josep Bisbe,et al.  Defining management accounting constructs: A methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification , 2007 .

[54]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  SAP: integrated information systems and the implications for management accountants , 1998 .

[55]  N. Carr.  IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[56]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  Enterprise resource planning systems, management control and the quest for integration , 2005 .

[57]  R. Chenhall.  Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: an exploratory study , 2005 .