Adaptive Ventricular Rate Smoothing During Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Comparison Study

An adaptive ventricular rate smoothing (VRS) algorithm is developed to regularize the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AF) by means of ventricular pacing (VP). Using a quantitative AF-VP model, we conduct pilot study to compare its performance with three other VRS algorithms. Simulations show that all VRS algorithms are effective to stabilize the heart rate during AF when intrinsic ventricular rate is not higher than the maximum pacing rate. The effect of VRS is diminished as the intrinsic ventricular rate increases, whereas slower intrinsic ventricular rate renders more aggressive VP. Compared to other methods, the Adaptive-VRS algorithm tends to stabilize the ventricular rate during AF with less VP, while intrinsic ventricular responses with physiological rate and rhythm are preferably preserved

[1]  B. Steinhaus,et al.  Optimized Standby Rate Reduces the Ventricular Rate Variability in Pacemaker Patients with Atrial Fibrillation , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[2]  H. Crijns,et al.  A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  A. Krahn,et al.  Acute Testing of the Rate‐Smoothed Pacing Algorithm for Ventricular Rate Stabilization , 1999, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[4]  David O. Martin,et al.  Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[5]  H. Crijns,et al.  A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation , 2002 .

[6]  F. Morady,et al.  Effect of an irregular ventricular rhythm on cardiac output. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  C. Lau,et al.  Effects of ventricular rate regularization pacing on quality of life and symptoms in patients with atrial fibrillation (Atrial fibrillation symptoms mediated by pacing to mean rates [AF SYMPTOMS study]). , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  A L Waldo,et al.  A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  A. Skanes,et al.  Safety and feasibility of a novel rate-smoothed ventricular pacing algorithm for atrial fibrillation. , 2001, American heart journal.

[10]  Jie Lian,et al.  Computer modeling of ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation and ventricular pacing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  P. Kowey,et al.  Overview of the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[12]  F. Wittkampf,et al.  Rate Stabilization by Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation , 1986, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[13]  M. Allessie,et al.  Electrical Remodeling and Atrial Dilation During Atrial Tachycardia are Influenced by Ventricular Rate: Role of Developing Tachycardiomyopathy , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[14]  G. Kay,et al.  Hemodynamic effects of an irregular sequence of ventricular cycle lengths during atrial fibrillation. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  G. Lamas,et al.  Adverse Effect of Ventricular Pacing on Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients With Normal Baseline QRS Duration in a Clinical Trial of Pacemaker Therapy for Sinus Node Dysfunction , 2003, Circulation.

[16]  F L Meijler,et al.  Effect of right ventricular pacing on ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Lian,et al.  Computer modelling of ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation and ventricular pacing , 2004, Computers in Cardiology, 2004.