Ants determine their next move at rest: motor planning and causality in complex systems

To find useful work to do for their colony, individual eusocial animals have to move, somehow staying attentive to relevant social information. Recent research on individual Temnothorax albipennis ants moving inside their colony’s nest found a power-law relationship between a movement’s duration and its average speed; and a universal speed profile for movements showing that they mostly fluctuate around a constant average speed. From this predictability it was inferred that movement durations are somehow determined before the movement itself. Here, we find similar results in lone T. albipennis ants exploring a large arena outside the nest, both when the arena is clean and when it contains chemical information left by previous nest-mates. This implies that these movement characteristics originate from the same individual neural and/or physiological mechanism(s), operating without immediate regard to social influences. However, the presence of pheromones and/or other cues was found to affect the inter-event speed correlations. Hence we suggest that ants’ motor planning results in intermittent response to the social environment: movement duration is adjusted in response to social information only between movements, not during them. This environmentally flexible, intermittently responsive movement behaviour points towards a spatially allocated division of labour in this species. It also prompts more general questions on collective animal movement and the role of intermittent causation from higher to lower organizational levels in the stability of complex systems.

[1]  Chris Tofts,et al.  Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Be meek or be bold? A colony-level behavioural syndrome in ants , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  When doing nothing is something. How task allocation strategies compromise between flexibility, efficiency, and inactive agents , 2015 .

[4]  Stasa Milojevic,et al.  Power law distributions in information science: Making the case for logarithmic binning , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  L. Stark,et al.  The main sequence, a tool for studying human eye movements , 1975 .

[6]  K. Christensen,et al.  Universality in ant behaviour , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  G. Holton Sociobiology: the new synthesis? , 1977, Newsletter on science, technology & human values.

[8]  Denis Noble,et al.  A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation , 2012, Interface Focus.

[9]  B. Cole Short-Term Activity Cycles in Ants: Generation of Periodicity by Worker Interaction , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[10]  J. Escós,et al.  Complexity of behavioural sequences and their relation to stress conditions in chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus): a non-invasive technique to evaluate animal welfare , 2004 .

[11]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Behavioural syndromes and social insects: personality at multiple levels , 2014, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[12]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Decision making by small and large house-hunting ant colonies: one size fits all , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Mike Holcombe,et al.  Insect communication: ‘No entry’ signal in ant foraging , 2005, Nature.

[14]  N. Shimizu [Neurology of eye movements]. , 2000, Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology.

[15]  D. Gordon The organization of work in social insect colonies , 1996, Nature.

[16]  A. Dornhaus Specialization Does Not Predict Individual Efficiency in an Ant , 2008, PLoS biology.

[17]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Coupled oscillators and activity waves in ant colonies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Sepideh Bazazi,et al.  Intermittent Motion in Desert Locusts: Behavioural Complexity in Simple Environments , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  M. Brass,et al.  Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  D. R. Chialvo,et al.  Unraveling the fluctuations of animal motor activity. , 2009, Chaos.

[21]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff Gait dynamics, fractals and falls: finding meaning in the stride-to-stride fluctuations of human walking. , 2007, Human movement science.

[22]  B. Brembs,et al.  Order in Spontaneous Behavior , 2007, PloS one.

[23]  Michael A. Huffman,et al.  Fractal Long‐Range Correlations in Behavioural Sequences of Wild Chimpanzees: a Non‐Invasive Analytical Tool for the Evaluation of Health , 2000 .

[24]  Alan Winterbottom,et al.  A Note on the Derivation of Fisher's Transformation of the Correlation Coefficient , 1979 .

[25]  D. Sumpter,et al.  From nonlinearity to optimality: pheromone trail foraging by ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Ant algorithms and stigmergy , 2000, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[27]  B. L. Zuber,et al.  Microsaccades and the Velocity-Amplitude Relationship for Saccadic Eye Movements , 1965, Science.

[28]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (a study of temporal polyethism: Experimental) , 1993 .

[29]  V. Isaeva Self-organization in biological systems , 2012, Biology Bulletin.

[30]  P. Alstrøm,et al.  COMPLEXITY AND CRITICALITY , 2004 .

[31]  Ana B Sendova-Franks,et al.  Landmarks and ant search strategies after interrupted tandem runs , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[32]  R. Menzel,et al.  Cognitive architecture of a mini-brain: the honeybee , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Thomas Schlegel,et al.  Stop Signals Provide Cross Inhibition in Collective Decision-making , 2022 .

[34]  J. Stamps,et al.  Unpredictable animals: individual differences in intraindividual variability (IIV) , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  Tim Kovacs,et al.  On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[36]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  The Use of Edges in Visual Navigation by the Ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2001 .

[37]  Enzo Tagliazucchi,et al.  How we move is universal: Scaling in the average shape of human activity , 2015, 1506.06717.

[38]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Ants estimate area using Buffon's needle , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  K. Wiesner,et al.  What is a complex system? , 2012, European Journal for Philosophy of Science.

[40]  Chris Tofts,et al.  Doing the right thing: Ants, honeybees and naked mole-rats. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  B. Brembs Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Jayanth R Banavar,et al.  Scale invariance in the dynamics of spontaneous behavior , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  F. Tripet,et al.  Foraging for Work and Age‐Based Polyethism: The Roles of Age and Previous Experience on Task Choice in Ants , 2004 .

[44]  T. Schultz In search of ant ancestors. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  N. R. Franks,et al.  Navigation using visual landmarks by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2002, Insectes Sociaux.

[46]  P. Subramanian Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing , 2006 .

[47]  I. Couzin Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  L. Seuront,et al.  Fractal analysis reveals pernicious stress levels related to boat presence and type in the Indo–Pacific bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops aduncus , 2011 .