Multidimensional scaling of consumer preferences for a public transportation system: An application of two approaches

Abstract Consumer attitudes toward a proposed new public transportation system were assessed through the application of two multidimensional scaling models to data on preference choices for system attributes. Carroll's vector model and Kruskal and Carmone's nonmetric unfolding model were compared on theoretical and empirical levels to determine their utility for exposing the latent structure of attitudes for a public project. While the unfolding model was attractive because of a theoretical property, the vector model was able to uncover latent dimensions for the attitudes which could be related via discriminant analysis to socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the respondents. The vector model also produced an outcome which was more closely related to a unidimensional analysis of these data. Therefore, even though both the vector and unfolding models produced plausible geometric representations of the attitudes which arc expected to aid urban transportation planners in designing systems, the vector model produced the more acceptable outcome.

[1]  B J McDermott,et al.  Multidimensional analyses of circuit quality judgments. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Victor E. McGee,et al.  THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF ‘ELASTIC’ DISTANCES , 1966 .

[3]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  An analysis of consumer preferences for a public transportation system , 1972 .

[4]  A. Householder,et al.  Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances , 1938 .

[5]  D T Hartgen,et al.  INDIVIDUAL ATTITUDES AND FAMILY ACTIVITIES: A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF TRAVELER MODE CHOICE , 1970 .

[6]  C H COOMBS,et al.  Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement. , 1950, Psychological review.

[7]  David Klahr,et al.  A monte carlo investigation of the statistical significance of Kruskal's nonmetric scaling procedure , 1969 .

[8]  C. Eckart,et al.  The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank , 1936 .

[9]  D. G. Morrison On the Interpretation of Discriminant Analysis , 1969 .

[10]  Alston S. Householder,et al.  A note on multidimensional psychophysical analysis , 1941 .

[11]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  On the perception of a class of bilaterally symmetric forms , 1973 .

[12]  D. H. Nash The generalized Eckart-Young principal axis theorem , 1975 .

[13]  R. Shepard The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .

[14]  J. B. Arnold A multidimensional scaling study of semantic distance. , 1971 .

[15]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A DEMAND-RESPONSIVE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM , 1971 .

[16]  H J Bauer,et al.  CASE STUDY OF A DEMAND-RESPONSIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM , 1971 .

[17]  A N Sommers,et al.  TOWARDS A THEORY OF TRAVELER MODE CHOICE , 1970 .

[18]  John B. Lansing,et al.  Residential location and urban mobility , 1966 .

[19]  W. Hays,et al.  Multidimensional unfolding: Determining the dimensionality of ranked preference data , 1960 .

[20]  F ATTNEAVE,et al.  Dimensions of similarity. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  J. Kruskal Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .

[22]  William L. Hays,et al.  Multidimensional unfolding: Determining configuration from complete rank order preference data , 1961 .

[23]  Forrest W. Young Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: Recovery of metric information , 1970 .

[24]  Forrest W. Young Computer program abstracts , 1968 .

[25]  Richard L. Gustafson,et al.  USER PREFERENCES FOR A DEMAND-RESPONSIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: A CASE STUDY REPORT , 1971 .

[26]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[27]  Herbert H. Stenson,et al.  GOODNESS OF FIT FOR RANDOM RANKINGS IN KRUSKAL'S NONMETRIC SCALING PROCEDURE * , 1969 .

[28]  J. Kruskal Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .

[29]  C. Coombs A theory of data. , 1965, Psychology Review.

[30]  E. B. Andersen,et al.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .