The Stakes of Capture–Recapture Models with State Uncertainty

The development of the use of CR multistate models is a major feature of the last 5 years. However, concerns have rightfully appeared about uncertainty in state assignment. I examine situations where uncertainties seem to be intrinsic such as with breeding status. But I also argue that uncertainty is not just a liability, it can be an opportunity – for instance, to exploit more fully the data at hand and limit disturbance. Then I examine the methodological answers that have been proposed. They mainly concern the models conditional on first release and are of a more or less general applicability. I advocate a general approach that can be adapted to each particular case and be used to expand extant specialized approaches. I will also consider how uncertainty could be incorporated into non-conditional models such as models of stopover duration. I conclude that, with the advent of genetic sampling, the new challenges for CR models will be uncertainty in individual identity and dependence among individuals.

[1]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Multievent: An Extension of Multistate Capture–Recapture Models to Uncertain States , 2005, Biometrics.

[2]  P. Lukacs,et al.  Review of capture–recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[3]  Carl J. Schwarz,et al.  Estimation and effects of tag-misread rates in capture-recapture studies , 1999 .

[4]  R. Pradel,et al.  Evidence for birth-site tenacity in breeding Common Black-headed Gulls, Larus ridibundus , 1998 .

[5]  Byron J. T. Morgan,et al.  Weak Identifiability in Models for Mark-Recapture-Recovery Data , 2009 .

[6]  Roger Pradel,et al.  RE-EVALUATION OF ADULT SURVIVAL OF BLACK-HEADED GULLS (LARUS RIDIBUNDUS) IN PRESENCE OF RECAPTURE HETEROGENEITY , 1998 .

[7]  Olivier Gimenez,et al.  State-space modelling of data on marked individuals , 2007 .

[8]  R. Redner,et al.  Mixture densities, maximum likelihood, and the EM algorithm , 1984 .

[9]  James E. Hines,et al.  ESTIMATION OF SEX-SPECIFIC SURVIVAL FROM CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA WHEN SEX IS NOT ALWAYS KNOWN , 2004 .

[10]  R. Pradel,et al.  MIGRATING BIRDS STOP OVER LONGER THAN USUALLY THOUGHT: AN IMPROVED CAPTURE–RECAPTURE ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[11]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Program E-Surge: A Software Application for Fitting Multievent Models , 2009 .

[12]  Hal Caswell,et al.  ESTIMATING POPULATION PROJECTION MATRICES FROM MULTI-STAGE MARK-RECAPTURE DATA , 2002 .

[13]  J. Norris,et al.  Capture-Recapture Models with Heterogeneity : I . Cormack-Jolly-Seber Model , 2003 .

[14]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Estimation of sex‐specific survival with uncertainty in sex assessment , 2008 .

[15]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Influence of food availability on demography and local population dynamics in a long-lived seabird , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  R. Pradel,et al.  MIGRATING BIRDS STOP OVER LONGER THAN USUALLY THOUGHT: REPLY , 2005 .

[17]  Michael C. Runge,et al.  CAPTURE‐RECAPTURE ANALYSIS FOR ESTIMATING MANATEE REPRODUCTIVE RATES , 2004 .

[18]  A. N. Arnason,et al.  The estimation of population size, migration rates and survival in a stratified population , 1973, Researches on Population Ecology.

[19]  B. Manly,et al.  Parsimonious modelling of capture―mark―recapture studies , 1985 .